The Web G22303Recalls & reported problems
Cook Incorporated · Web II Memory Extraction Basket · Class 2
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 4
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00827002223035), received between Jul 26, 2019 and May 19, 2026 — classified as 1 injury, 3 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Rupture” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Material Rupture2
- Material Split, Cut or Torn2
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
- Foreign Body In Patient1
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionMay 19, 2026Material Rupture
DURING AN ENDOSCOPIC PROCEDURE, THE PHYSICIAN USED A COOK WEB II MEMORY EXTRACTION BASKET. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PHYSICIAN WAS UNABLE TO FULLY DEPLOY THE BASKET AFTER ADVANCING THE DEVICE INTO THE PATIENT¿S BILE DUCT. WHEN SLIGHT FORCE WAS APPLIED TO EXTEND THE BASKET, IT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY OBSERVED DURING RETRACTION THAT THE INNER CORE HAD PROTRUDED THROUGH THE SHEATH. A SECTION OF THE DEVICE DID NOT REMAIN INSIDE THE PATIENT¿S BODY. THE PATIENT DID NOT REQUIRE ANY ADDITIONAL PROCEDURES DUE TO THIS OCCURRENCE. ACCORDING TO THE INITIAL REPORTER, THE PATIENT DID NOT EXPERIENCE ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS DUE TO THIS OCCURRENCE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25216611 ↗MalfunctionAug 27, 2025Material Rupture; Material Rupture
DURING AN ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY, ERCP, THE PHYSICIAN USED A COOK WEB II MEMORY EXTRACTION BASKET. IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN ATTEMPT TO EXTRACT STONES, THE BASKET WAS MANEUVERING AROUND THE STONE AND ATTEMPTING TO CRUSH IT WHEN THE DRIVE WIRE DETACHED FROM THE HANDLE AND EXITED THE PLASTIC SHEATH. THE DEVICE WAS REMOVED, THE PROCEDURE WAS HALTED, AND IT COULD NOT BE COMPLETED. A SECTION OF THE DEVICE DID NOT REMAIN INSIDE THE PATIENT¿S BODY. THE PATIENT DID NOT REQUIRE ANY ADDITIONAL PROCEDURES DUE TO THIS OCCURRENCE. ACCORDING TO THE INITIAL REPORTER, THE PATIENT DID NOT EXPERIENCE ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS DUE TO THIS OCCURRENCE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22903154 ↗MalfunctionSep 18, 2019Material Split, Cut or Torn; Material Split, Cut or Torn
DURING AN ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY (ERCP), THE PHYSICIAN USED A COOK WEB II MEMORY EXTRACTION BASKET. THE TECHNICIAN FOUND THE BASKET'S HANDLE WAS STUCK AND COULD NOT OPEN THE BASKET. HE WITHDREW IT AND USED A NEW ONE. THERE WAS NO REPORTABLE INFORMATION AT THIS TIME. THE DEVICE WAS EVALUATED ON (B)(6) 2019. THE DRIVE WIRE HAD RUPTURED THROUGH THE CATHETER ON THE PROXIMAL END OF THE DEVICE. A SECTION OF THE DEVICE DID NOT REMAIN INSIDE THE PATIENT¿S BODY. THE PATIENT DID NOT REQUIRE ANY ADDITIONAL PROCEDURES DUE TO THIS OCCURRENCE. ACCORDING TO THE INITIAL REPORTER, THE PATIENT DID NOT EXPERIENCE ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS DUE TO THIS OCCURRENCE.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 9083460 ↗InjuryJul 26, 2019Material Split, Cut or Torn; Material Split, Cut or Torn
DURING A STONE RETRIEVAL PROCEDURE, THE PHYSICIAN USED A COOK WEB II MEMORY EXTRACTION BASKET. ONCE THE STONE WAS RETRIEVED, AND THE NURSE STARTED TO CLOSE THE BASKET, THE PLASTIC SHEATH BROKE NEAR THE HANDLE, THUS IT WAS NOT POSSIBLE TO EXTRACT THE BASKET NOR THE STONE. PART OF THE WIRES OF THE BASKET CAME OUT AND IT WAS NOT POSSIBLE TO RE-OPEN THE BASKET. THEY CUT THE HANDLE TO REMOVE THE ENDOSCOPE. THE PATIENT HAD TO UNDERGO SURGERY TO REMOVE IT [THE BASKET AND BILIARY STONE]. THE EXTRACTION BASKET REMAINED INSIDE THE PATIENT¿S BODY. THE PATIENT REQUIRED SURGERY TO REMOVE THE BASKET AND BILIARY STONE DUE TO THIS OCCURRENCE. ACCORDING TO THE INITIAL REPORTER, THE PATIENT DID NOT EXPERIENCE ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS DUE TO THIS OCCURRENCE.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 8833404 ↗
Other DISLODGER, STONE, BILIARY devices
- Memory Basket G25149Cook Incorporated · DISLODGER, STONE, BILIARY75 reports
- Stonetome M00535110Boston Scientific Corporation · DISLODGER, STONE, BILIARY74 reports
- Stonetome M00535150Boston Scientific Corporation · DISLODGER, STONE, BILIARY67 reports
- Cook G36250Cook Incorporated · DISLODGER, STONE, BILIARY1 recall10 reports
- NCompass G36251Cook Incorporated · DISLODGER, STONE, BILIARY1 recall8 reports
- Strange G09108Cook Incorporated · DISLODGER, STONE, BILIARY1 recall1 report
- Single Use Retrieval Nitinol Basket V FG-V451POlympus Medical Systems Corp. · DISLODGER, STONE, BILIARY31 reports
- SpyGlass™ Retrieval Basket M00546550Boston Scientific Corporation · DISLODGER, STONE, BILIARY23 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page