Memory Basket G24737Recalls & reported problems
Cook Incorporated · Memory II Double Lumen Extraction Basket · Class 2
- Adverse event reports
- 2
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00827002247376), received between Nov 22, 2019 and Feb 3, 2026 — classified as 2 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Difficult to Fold, Unfold or Collapse” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Difficult to Fold, Unfold or Collapse1
- Fracture1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionFeb 3, 2026Difficult to Fold, Unfold or Collapse
DURING AN ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY, THE PHYSICIAN USED TWO COOK MEMORY II DOUBLE LUMEN EXTRACTION BASKETS. IT WAS REPORTED THAT WHEN THE NURSE TRIED TO PUT THE BASKET INSIDE THE SHEATH, THE BASKET WAS NOT PUT INSIDE. A SECTION OF THE DEVICE DID NOT REMAIN INSIDE THE PATIENT¿S BODY. THE PATIENT DID NOT REQUIRE ANY ADDITIONAL PROCEDURES DUE TO THIS OCCURRENCE. ACCORDING TO THE INITIAL REPORTER, THE PATIENT DID NOT EXPERIENCE ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS DUE TO THIS OCCURRENCE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24250240 ↗MalfunctionNov 22, 2019Fracture; Fracture
DURING AN ENDOSCOPIC PROCEDURE, THE PHYSICIAN USED A COOK MEMORY II DOUBLE LUMEN EXTRACTION BASKET FOR REMOVAL OF BILE DUCT STONE(S). THE BASKET WAS INSERTED INTO THE ENDOSCOPE AND ADVANCED TO THE COMMON BILE DUCT. AFTER EXTRACTING SOME SMALL BILE DUCT STONES, THE USER CLEANED THE BASKET TO REMOVE ADHERED SUBSTANCE ON THE BASKET. THEN THE USER USED THE BASKET AND EXTRACTED BILE DUCT STONES TWICE. HE ATTEMPTED TO CLEAN THE BASKET AGAIN BUT HE FOUND THAT ONE BASKET WIRE SEPARATED FROM THE JOINT OF THE BASKET WIRE. THEREFORE THE USER USED A COMPETITORS DEVICE INSTEAD AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED. A SECTION OF THE DEVICE DID NOT REMAIN INSIDE THE PATIENT¿S BODY. THE PATIENT DID NOT REQUIRE ANY ADDITIONAL PROCEDURES DUE TO THIS OCCURRENCE. ACCORDING TO THE INITIAL REPORTER, THE PATIENT DID NOT EXPERIENCE ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS DUE TO THIS OCCURRENCE.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 9364905 ↗
Other DISLODGER, STONE, BILIARY devices
- Memory Basket G25149Cook Incorporated · DISLODGER, STONE, BILIARY75 reports
- Stonetome M00535110Boston Scientific Corporation · DISLODGER, STONE, BILIARY74 reports
- Stonetome M00535150Boston Scientific Corporation · DISLODGER, STONE, BILIARY67 reports
- Cook G36250Cook Incorporated · DISLODGER, STONE, BILIARY1 recall10 reports
- NCompass G36251Cook Incorporated · DISLODGER, STONE, BILIARY1 recall8 reports
- Strange G09108Cook Incorporated · DISLODGER, STONE, BILIARY1 recall1 report
- Single Use Retrieval Nitinol Basket V FG-V451POlympus Medical Systems Corp. · DISLODGER, STONE, BILIARY31 reports
- SpyGlass™ Retrieval Basket M00546550Boston Scientific Corporation · DISLODGER, STONE, BILIARY23 reports
Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.