Nester G26994Recalls & reported problems
Cook Incorporated · Nester Embolization Coil · Class 2 · Implant
All models of Nester (38)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 3
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 2
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00827002269941), received between Jul 1, 2017 and Feb 24, 2026 — classified as 2 injuries, 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Migration or Expulsion of Device” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
- Migration or Expulsion of Device1
- Unraveled Material1
Patient problems
- No Code Available2
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
- Reaction1
Recent adverse event reports
The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionFeb 24, 2026Unraveled Material
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE NESTER PLATINUM EMBOLIZATION COIL UNRAVELED. UPON RELEASE OF THE NESTER COIL DURING AN UNKNOWN EMBOLIZATION PROCEDURE FOR AN UNKNOWN PATIENT, THE COIL "DID NOT UNWIND COMPLETELY AND BECAME FRAYED (APPARENTLY SPLIT LENGTHWISE). IN ADDITION, SEVERAL KNOTS FORMED, PARTICULARLY IN THE PROBE, WHERE THEY REMAINED STUCK. THE FURTHER THE PROBE WAS WITHDRAWN, THE MORE THE COIL STRETCHED." THE DEVICE WAS EXCHANGED FOR AN UNKNOWN NEW DEVICE. THE DEVICE WAS NOT RETAINED IN THE PATIENT. AS REPORTED, THE PATIENT DID NOT EXPERIENCE ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS OR REQUIRE ANY ADDITIONAL PROCEDURES DUE TO THIS OCCURRENCE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING THE EVENT HAS BEEN REQUESTED BUT IS CURRENTLY UNAVAILABLE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24427826 ↗InjuryJul 1, 2017Migration or Expulsion of Device; Migration or Expulsion of Device
PER FDA MW5069779: ¿REMOVAL OF COOK MEDICAL NESTER COILS AFTER ADVERSE ALLERGIC REACTION AND MIGRATION TO THE RENAL VEIN. SURGICAL OPINION UPON REMOVAL WAS THAT THESE COILS WERE RELEASED TOO CLOSE TO THE RENAL VEIN. PT WAS IMPLANTED WITH COILS TO TREAT ¿PAIN¿ REPORTED TO HIS PHYSICIAN. THE PHYSICIAN ADVISED THAT HE BELIEVED THE PT. TO HAVE VARICOCELE AND REQUIRED EMBOLIZATION AS A TREATMENT. AFTER IMPLANTATION, THE PT EXPERIENCED ELEVATED EOSINOPHILS, INCREASED DISCOMFORT IN THE TREATED AREA. RAPID DECREASE OF TOTAL TESTOSTERONE (BELOW NORMAL RANGE OF 300), POOR LIVER FUNCTION. PT HAD NO PREVIOUS MEDICAL HISTORY OF THESE ISSUES PRIOR TO IMPLANTATION, ADDITIONALLY, THE PT WAS UNABLE TO PERFORM BASIC TASKS THAT HE PREVIOUSLY HAD NO ISSUES PERFORMING (SUCH AS DRIVING A MANUAL TRANSMISSION VEHICLE). THE PT HAD THE COILS REMOVED ON (B)(6) 2017 BY DR. WHO WAS ABLE TO SUCCESSFULLY REMOVE THE COILS.¿ THIS IS ONE OF SIX MEDWATCH REPORTS BEING SUBMITTED AS THE CUSTOMER REPORTED TWO SEPARATE EVENTS INVOLVING THREE DIFFERENT PRODUCT LOT NUMBERS. REFERENCE MDR NUMBERS: 1820334-2017-01607, 1820334-2017-01608, 1820334-2017-01609, 1820334-2017-01610, 1820334-2017-01611, 1820334-2017-01612 THE SAME
Patient problems: No Code Available
MAUDE report 6683451 ↗InjuryJul 1, 2017Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
PER FDA MW5069779: ¿REMOVAL OF COOK MEDICAL NESTER COILS AFTER ADVERSE ALLERGIC REACTION AND MIGRATION TO THE RENAL VEIN. SURGICAL OPINION UPON REMOVAL WAS THAT THESE COILS WERE RELEASED TOO CLOSE TO THE RENAL VEIN. PT WAS IMPLANTED WITH COILS TO TREAT ¿PAIN¿ REPORTED TO HIS PHYSICIAN. THE PHYSICIAN ADVISED THAT HE BELIEVED THE PT. TO HAVE VARICOCELE AND REQUIRED EMBOLIZATION AS A TREATMENT. AFTER IMPLANTATION, THE PT EXPERIENCED ELEVATED EOSINOPHILS, INCREASED DISCOMFORT IN THE TREATED AREA. RAPID DECREASE OF TOTAL TESTOSTERONE (BELOW NORMAL RANGE OF 300), POOR LIVER FUNCTION. PT HAD NO PREVIOUS MEDICAL HISTORY OF THESE ISSUES PRIOR TO IMPLANTATION, ADDITIONALLY, THE PT WAS UNABLE TO PERFORM BASIC TASKS THAT HE PREVIOUSLY HAD NO ISSUES PERFORMING (SUCH AS DRIVING A MANUAL TRANSMISSION VEHICLE). THE PT HAD THE COILS REMOVED ON (B)(6) 2017 BY DR. WHO WAS ABLE TO SUCCESSFULLY REMOVE THE COILS.¿ THIS IS ONE OF SIX MEDWATCH REPORTS BEING SUBMITTED AS THE CUSTOMER REPORTED TWO SEPARATE EVENTS INVOLVING THREE DIFFERENT PRODUCT LOT NUMBERS. REFERENCE MDR NUMBERS: 1820334-2017-01607, 1820334-2017-01608, 1820334-2017-01609, 1820334-2017-01610, 1820334-2017-01611, 1820334-2017-01612 THE SAME
Patient problems: No Code Available; Reaction
MAUDE report 6683446 ↗
Other Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization devices
- POD RBYPOD8-APenumbra, Inc. · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization195 reports
- CEREPAKTM MDH1Cerenovus, Inc. · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization1 recall72 reports
- Azur CX Detachable 45-750824Microvention, Inc. · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization115 reports
- Tornado G08261Cook Incorporated · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization2 recalls7 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0930CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls4 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0720CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls4 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0413CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls3 reports
- Prestige Coil System PRES0520HPKPLBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls3 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page