Skip to content

Lunderquist G46729Recalls & reported problems

William Cook Europe ApS · Lunderquist, Extra Stiff Wire Guide · Class 2

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00827002467293), received between May 31, 2017 and Oct 21, 2024 — classified as 1 injury, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device-Device Incompatibility” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 1 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Device-Device Incompatibility1
  • Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method1
  • Unraveled Material1

Patient problems

  • Insufficient Information1
  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryOct 21, 2024Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method; Device-Device Incompatibility; Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method; Device-Device Incompatibility

    DESCRIPTION OF EVENT ACCORDING TO INITIAL REPORTER: THE OUTSIDE OF THE GUIDEWIRE HAS BECOME LOOSE AND AS A RESULT, HAS BECOME STUCK IN THE GRAFT. CONVERSION WAS NECESSARY. PER COMPLAINT FORM: THE LUNDERQUIST WAS BROUGHT IN, A MEDTRONIC DELIVERY SYSTEM WAS BROUGHT IN OVER THE WIRE, ALL NORMAL STEPS WERE DONE. DURING BRINGING IN THE CONTRAL LATERAL LEG THE WIRE WAS STUCK IN THE DELIVERY SYSTEM. PULLING OUT WAS NOT POSSIBLE. PATIENT WAS CONVERTED TO AN OPEN PROCEDURE, EVERYTHING WAS TAKEN OUT AND THE PATIENT RECEIVED A SURGICAL GRAFT. BOTH MAIN DEVICE AND CONTROL LATERAL LEG WERE ALREADY DEPLOYED WHEN THE LUNDERQUIST WAS STUCK IN THE MEDTRONIC DEVICE. CLINICAL SPECIALIST FROM MEDTRONIC SAID THE WIRE WAS OVER THE BIFURCATION, BUT IN THE ATTACHED VIDEO THE WIRE IS IN THE AORTA. NOBODY UNDERSTOOD WHY THE WIRE WAS STUCK, ALL NORMAL STEPS WERE TAKEN. PATIENT OUTCOME: AFTER OPEN PROCEDURE, ALL PARTS HAVE BEEN TAKEN OUT. AN ENDOVASCULAR AORTIC REPAIR (EVAR) WAS CONVERTED TO AN OPEN PROCEDURE IN ORDER TO REMOVE THE STENT FROM MEDTRONIC AND LUNDERQUIST WIRE. BECAUSE OF THE PRODUCT FAILURE AN OPEN PROCEDURE WAS PERFORMED, PATIENT WENT TO IC AFTERWARDS.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 20491289 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 31, 2017Unraveled Material; Unraveled Material

    DESCRIPTION OF EVENT ACCORDING TO INITIAL REPORTER: WIRE DISINTEGRATED INTO INDIVIDUAL STRANDS WHEN BEING PULLED OUT OF THE CATHETER. THE PHYSICIAN WASN´T ABLE TO PULL OUT THE GUIDE WIRE THROUGH THE CANNULA OF THE LABS-100-J SET. AFTER HE MANAGED TO PULL THE GUIDE WIRE OUT, THE WIRE WAS PARTLY BROKEN, BUT NOT TOTALLY BROKEN. PATIENT OUTCOME: THE PATIENT DID NOT REQUIRE ANY ADDITIONAL PROCEDURES DUE TO THIS OCCURRENCE. ACCORDING TO THE INITIAL REPORTER, THE PATIENT DID NOT EXPERIENCE ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS DUE TO THIS OCCURRENCE.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 6600523 ↗

Other WIRE, GUIDE, CATHETER devices

All WIRE, GUIDE, CATHETER devices →

Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.