Nester G52752Recalls & reported problems
Cook Incorporated · Nester Embolization Coil · Class 2 · Implant
All models of Nester (38)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 3
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 3
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00827002527522), received between Jan 18, 2021 and Jan 18, 2021 — classified as 3 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Migration” (3 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Migration3
Patient problems
- Patient Problem/Medical Problem3
Recent adverse event reports
The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryJan 18, 2021Migration; Migration
NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING THE PATIENT AND/OR EVENT HAS BEEN RECEIVED SINCE THE PREVIOUS MEDWATCH REPORT WAS SENT.
Patient problems: Patient Problem/Medical Problem
MAUDE report 11187046 ↗InjuryJan 18, 2021Migration; Migration
IT WAS REPORTED BY A LAW FIRM "IN 2016, (PATIENT) SUFFERED FROM VARICOSE VEINS OF THE LOWER EXTREMITIES AND PELVIC CONGESTION SYNDROME." PATIENT ELECTED TO HAVE AN EMBOLIZATION PROCEDURE, DURING WHICH SEVERAL COOK NESTER AND TORNADO EMBOLIZATION COILS WERE IMPLANTED. REPORT STATES THE PATIENT "EXPERIENCED A LITANY OF HEALTH ISSUES UNTIL SHE HAD THE COILS REMOVED, INCLUDING: EXTREME PAIN; AUTOIMMUNE DIAGNOSES; DIFFICULTY WALKING; AND RENAL ISSUES. ON OR ABOUT (B)(6) 2018, PATIENT OPTED TO HAVE THE COILS REMOVED, AT WHICH TIME IT WAS FOUND THE COILS HAD PERFORATED AND MIGRATED. REPORT FURTHER STATES "AFTER THE COILS WERE REMOVED, PATIENT BEGAN TO FEEL RELIEF." MEDICAL RECORDS INDICATED THE FOLLOWING: ON (B)(6) 2016, PATIENT UNDERWENT BILATERAL COILING OF GONADAL VEINS DUE TO REFLUX AND DILATION. BILATERAL OVARIAN VEIN INSUFFICIENCY WITH MARKEDLY ENLARGED OVARIAN VEINS AND PELVIC VARICES WAS CONFIRMED. SUCCESSFUL BILATERAL OVARIAN VEIN COIL EMBOLIZATION DISTAL TO PROXIMAL WAS PERFORMED AND PERIODIC VENOGRAMS CONFIRMED STASIS AND CLOSURE OF OVARIAN VEIN BRANCHES. THERE WERE NO IMMEDIATE COMPLICATIONS AND UPON REMOVAL OF THE CATHETER AND SHEATH, HEMOSTASIS WAS ACHIEVED WITH MANUAL PRESS
Patient problems: Patient Problem/Medical Problem
MAUDE report 11187043 ↗InjuryJan 18, 2021Migration; Migration
IT WAS REPORTED BY A LAW FIRM "IN 2016, (PATIENT) SUFFERED FROM VARICOSE VEINS OF THE LOWER EXTREMITIES AND PELVIC CONGESTION SYNDROME." PATIENT ELECTED TO HAVE AN EMBOLIZATION PROCEDURE, DURING WHICH SEVERAL COOK NESTER AND TORNADO EMBOLIZATION COILS WERE IMPLANTED. REPORT STATES THE PATIENT "EXPERIENCED A LITANY OF HEALTH ISSUES UNTIL SHE HAD THE COILS REMOVED, INCLUDING: EXTREME PAIN; AUTOIMMUNE DIAGNOSES; DIFFICULTY WALKING; AND RENAL ISSUES. ON OR ABOUT (B)(6) 2018, PATIENT OPTED TO HAVE THE COILS REMOVED, AT WHICH TIME IT WAS FOUND THE COILS HAD PERFORATED AND MIGRATED. REPORT FURTHER STATES "AFTER THE COILS WERE REMOVED, PATIENT BEGAN TO FEEL RELIEF." MEDICAL RECORDS INDICATED THE FOLLOWING: ON (B)(6) 2016, PATIENT UNDERWENT BILATERAL COILING OF GONADAL VEINS DUE TO REFLUX AND DILATION. BILATERAL OVARIAN VEIN INSUFFICIENCY WITH MARKEDLY ENLARGED OVARIAN VEINS AND PELVIC VARICES WAS CONFIRMED. SUCCESSFUL BILATERAL OVARIAN VEIN COIL EMBOLIZATION DISTAL TO PROXIMAL WAS PERFORMED AND PERIODIC VENOGRAMS CONFIRMED STASIS AND CLOSURE OF OVARIAN VEIN BRANCHES. THERE WERE NO IMMEDIATE COMPLICATIONS AND UPON REMOVAL OF THE CATHETER AND SHEATH, HEMOSTASIS WAS ACHIEVED WITH MANUAL PRESS
Patient problems: Patient Problem/Medical Problem
MAUDE report 11187001 ↗
Other Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization devices
- POD RBYPOD8-APenumbra, Inc. · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization195 reports
- CEREPAKTM MDH1Cerenovus, Inc. · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization1 recall72 reports
- Azur CX Detachable 45-750824Microvention, Inc. · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization115 reports
- Tornado G08261Cook Incorporated · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization2 recalls7 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0930CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls4 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0720CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls4 reports
- Prestige Coil System PRES0520HPKPLBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls3 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0413CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls3 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page