Skip to content

Cook G52834Recalls & reported problems

Cook Incorporated · Endovascular Dilator Set Coons Dilator · Class 2

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 00827002528345), received between Feb 20, 2025 and Feb 20, 2025 — classified as 1 injury.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 1 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size1

Patient problems

  • Vascular Dissection1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryFeb 20, 2025Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size; Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size

    COOK WAS NOTIFIED THAT A DISSECTION OF THE RIGHT COMMON FEMORAL ARTERY WAS IDENTIFIED THIRTY-FIVE DAYS AFTER THE USE OF COOK PRODUCTS IN A FOUR-VESSEL FENESTRATED ENDOVASCULAR AORTIC REPAIR (FEVAR). THE PATIENT UNDERWENT PREOPERATIVE COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY (CT) SCAN ON (B)(6) 2024, 48 DAYS PRIOR TO THE PROCEDURE. THE CT SCAN WAS COMPLETED BY THE SITE AND IDENTIFIED THE FOLLOWING: PER PATIENT ECRF: PRE-PROCEDURE IMAGING WAS COMPLETED ON (B)(6) 2024, 48 DAYS PRIOR TO THE PROCEDURE. THE PROXIMAL SEALING ZONE DID NOT HAVE ANY OCCLUSIVE DISEASE OR THROMBUS. HOWEVER MILD CALCIFICATION WAS PRESENT. THE PROXIMAL SEALING ZONE WAS DESCRIBED AS PARALLEL. THE RIGHT COMMON ILIAC ARTERY LEFT COMMON ILIAC ARTERY, RIGHT EXTERNAL ILIAC ARTERY, LEFT EXTERNAL ILIAC ARTERY, RIGHT FEMORAL ARTERY, LEFT FORMAL ARTERY DID NOT HAVE ANY OCCLUSIVE DISEASE. THE RIGHT COMMON ILIAC ARTERY HAD MILD CALCIFICATION. THE LEFT COMMON ILIAC ARTERY HAD MILD CALCIFICATION. THE RIGHT ILIAC ARTERY TORTUOSITY WAS DESCRIBED TO BE MILD. THE LEFT ILIAC ARTERY TORTUOSITY WAS DESCRIBED TO BE MILD. THE AORTA DIAMETER AT THE LOCATION OF THE MAXIMUM ANEURYSM DIAMETER (OUTER-WALL TO OUTER-WALL) WAS 55 MM. THE LENGTH OF THE SUITABLE PR

    Patient problems: Vascular Dissection

    MAUDE report 21424302 ↗

Other DILATOR, VESSEL, FOR PERCUTANEOUS CATHETERIZATION devices

All DILATOR, VESSEL, FOR PERCUTANEOUS CATHETERIZATION devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page