Skip to content

Reform Ti Modular 39-MT-0401Recalls & reported problems

Precision Spine, Inc. · Modular Tulip · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00840019932622), received between Aug 17, 2023 and Jul 8, 2024 — classified as 2 injuries, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Detachment of Device or Device Component” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 1 reportsJul 2024: 1 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Detachment of Device or Device Component2
  • Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJul 8, 2024Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PROCEDURE WAS PERFORMED IN AUSTRALIA ON (B)(6) 2024, UTILIZING THE REFORM MC MIDLINE CORTICAL SCREW SYSTEM. DURING THE PROCEDURE THE REFORM TI MODULAR POLYAXIAL TULIP ASSEMBLY (39-MT-0401) WAS ASSEMBLED ONTO THE MIDLINE CORTICAL BONE SCREW (59-BP-XXXX) ON THE NURSES TABLE. THE ASSEMBLED SCREW WAS LOADED ONTO A T25 CANNULATED POLY DRIVER W/LOCK (C3164) AND THE DRIVER WAS TIGHTENED AND LOCKED. THE SCREW WAS PLACED INTO THE PATIENT AND WHEN THE SCREWDRIVER WAS RELEASED FROM THE SCREW THE TULIP DISASSEMBLED FROM THE SCREW AND DROPPED INTO THE WOUND. THE TULIP WAS RETRIEVED USING FORCEPS AND WAS SNAPPED BACK ONTO THE SCREW BY THE SURGEON AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY AND AN APPROXIMATE 5 MINUTE DELAY TO THE PROCEDURE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19689225 ↗
  • InjuryJun 25, 2024Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PROCEDURE WAS PERFORMED IN AUSTRALIA ON (B)(6) 2024, UTILIZING THE REFORM MC MIDLINE CORTICAL SCREW SYSTEM. WHILE INSERTING A REFORM TI MODULAR POLYAXIAL TULIP ASSEMBLY (39-MT-0401) ASSEMBLED ON A Ø6.5 X 45MM MIDLINE CORTICAL BONE SCREW (59-BP-6545) THE TULIP CAME OFF OF THE SCREW WHEN THE DRIVER WAS REMOVED. THE TULIP DROPPED INTO THE WOUND AND WAS RETRIEVED USING FORCEPS. THE TULIP WAS THEN SNAPPED BACK ONTO THE SCREW SHANK AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ONLY A SHORT DELAY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19608580 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 17, 2023Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PROCEDURE WAS PERFORMED BY ON (B)(6)2023, UTILIZING THE REFORM TI MODULAR SCREW SYSTEM. THE SCRUB TECH CONNECTED THE REFORM TI MODULAR POLYAXIAL TULIP ASSEMBLY (39-MT-0401) TO THE 65MM REFORM TI MODULAR NON-CANNULATED SCREW (39-SB-XXXX), LOADED THE ASSEMBLED SCREW/TULIP ON THE DRIVER AND HANDED IT TO THE SURGEON. WHEN THE SURGEON ATTEMPTED TO IMPLANT THE SCREW, THE TULIP DETACHED FROM THE SCREW. THE SCREW WAS TAKEN TO THE BACK TABLE AND REASSEMBLED ON A DIFFERENT SCREW AND SUBSEQUENTLY IMPLANTED SUCCESSFULLY. THERE WAS NO DELAY TO THE PROCEDURE OR PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 17568836 ↗

Other Appliance, Fixation, Spinal Interlaminal devices

All Appliance, Fixation, Spinal Interlaminal devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page