Skip to content

Optima Coil System OPTIPAX3014Recalls & reported problems

Balt USA LLC · The Optima Coil System is a series of specialized coils that are inserted into the vasculature under angiographic visualization to embolize intracranial aneurysms and other vascular anomalies. The system consists of an embolization coil implant comprised of platinum and tungsten, affixed to a delivery pusher to facilitate insertion into the hub of a microcatheter. The system is available in various shapes, lengths, and sizes. The devices are to be placed into aneurysms to create blood stasis, reducing flow into the aneurysm and thrombosing the aneurysm. Upon positioning coils into the aneurysm, the coils are detached from the delivery pusher in a serial manner until the aneurysm is occluded. · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Optima Coil System (379)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00840303713715), received between Mar 6, 2026 and Mar 30, 2026 — classified as 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Premature Separation” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 2 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Premature Separation2
  • Failure to Advance1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionMar 30, 2026Failure to Advance; Premature Separation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT: "MMA EMBOLIZATION. PHYSICIAN HAD A 6FR BENCHMARK, PLATO 17 MICROCATHETER, AND A 0.014" WIRE. FRONTAL BRANCH OF RIGHT MMA SELECTED WITH DISTAL ACCESS OF PLATO 17. PHYSICIAN BEGAN TO DEPLOY PAX, FELT SOME RESISTANCE WHILE PACKING AND THEN UPON ATTEMPTING TO MANIPULATE COIL HE FELT THE RESISTANCE GONE AND THE COIL WAS NO LONGER ATTACHED. HE PUSHED THE REST OF THE COIL OUT OF THE MICROCATHETER WIRE A WIRE THROUGH THE PLATO 17 AND IT WAS IN MMA AND THE IMAX." UPDATE 18MAR2026 - ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED FROM THE ISSUER: "1.DID THE PROCEDURE INVOLVE TORTUOUS ANATOMY? NOT UNUSUALLY TORTUOUS. 2. WILL THE MICROCATHETER BE AVAILABLE FOR RETURN? NO 3. WHERE DID THE IMPLANT PREMATURELY DETACH? (INSIDE THE AN, INSIDE THE MC?, ETC) ABOUT 10CM OF THE COIL WAS IN THE ANTERIOR MMA BRANCH. THE REMAINING 20CM WAS WITHIN THE PLATO 17 MICROCATHETER AT TIME OF PREMATURE DETACHMENT 4. WERE ANY ATTEMPTS MADE TO DETACH THE IMPLANT COIL USING THE DETACHMENT CONTROLLER? NO 5. CAN YOU CONFIRM IF THE DEVICE WAS IMPLANTED? YES. IT WAS PUSHED OUT WITH A WIRE AND WAS PARTIALLY IN MMA AND IMAX ARTERIES." INCIDENT REPORT FORM SUBMITTED FOR THIS COMPLAINT INDICATES THAT NO PATIENT INJURY

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24716771 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 6, 2026Premature Separation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT: "THE PHYSICIAN WAS TREATING AN MMA WITHOUT PARTICLES, A COIL ONLY TECHNIQUE. HE WAS COILING THROUGH A PHENOM17 MICROCATHETER. INITIALLY THE COIL TRAVELLED DISTALLY AS EXPECTED, BUT WAS NOT BREAKING PROXIMALLY WHATSOEVER AND THE COIL WAS SO LONG THAT IT WAS KICKING THE CATHETER BACK ALL THE WAY INTO THE IMAX. EVENTUALLY WHILE MANEUVERING THE COIL TO TRY TO GET IT TO BREAK, THE COIL PREMATURELY DETACHED. AFTER MULTIPLE ATTEMPTS TO PUSH IT OUT OF THE MICROCATHETER WITH A WIRE, THE COIL ENDED UP STAYING IN THE IMAX." INCIDENT REPORT FORM SUBMITTED FOR THIS COMPLAINT INDICATES THAT NO PATIENT INJURY WAS SUSTAINED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24539276 ↗

Other Device, Neurovascular Embolization devices

All Device, Neurovascular Embolization devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page