INFINITY 33630023Recalls & reported problems
Wright Medical Technology, Inc. · Class 2 · Implant
Data updated Oct 13, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
Quick summary
This Wright Medical Infinity total ankle system is a cemented metal-on-plastic ankle joint replacement. The 63 reports mostly describe the replacement not bonding well with the bone, with loosening, bone loss, cysts and pain, and some patients needing revision surgery for infection or implant misalignment; 63 injuries and no deaths are reported. There are no recalls naming this device. Reports in the past 12 months (12) are fewer than in the year before (28).
AI-generated from the FDA records on this page and checked automatically against the numbers below. Read the details before relying on it.
- Adverse event reports
- 60
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 60
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 60 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00840420122049), received between Nov 29, 2021 and Aug 18, 2026 — classified as 60 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Osseointegration Problem” (20 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem35
- Osseointegration Problem20
- Loss of Osseointegration7
- Migration5
- Fracture1
- Insufficient Device Problem Information1
- Malposition of Device1
Patient problems
- Inadequate Osseointegration19
- Implant Pain12
- Osteolysis12
- Unspecified Infection12
- Cyst(s)10
- Pain6
- Bone Fracture(s)5
- Joint Impingement4
Recent adverse event reports
The 25 most recent of 60 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryAug 18, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
The manufacturer received a report from the National Joint Registry that contains unpublished collected data on the usage and the outcomes of the ankle joint replacement. The report details analysis provided for revision procedures performed for the monthly report of (b)(6) 2026During the review of the report, it was identified that a patient required revision surgery due to malalignment which was not previously reported to the manufacturer.
Patient problems: Subluxation
MAUDE report 50295378 ↗InjuryAug 17, 2026Fracture; Loss of Osseointegration
The manufacturer received a report from the National Joint Registry that contains unpublished collected data on the usage and the outcomes of the ankle joint replacement. The report details analysis provided for revision procedures performed for the monthly report of (b)(6) 2026.During the review of the report, it was identified that a patient required revision surgery due to aseptic loosening of the tibial and talar components, with associated talar osteolysis (lysis of the talus) and fracture of the talar implant component which was not previously reported to the manufacturer.
Patient problems: Osteolysis
MAUDE report 50274699 ↗InjuryJun 8, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
THE MANUFACTURER RECEIVED A REPORT FROM THE NATIONAL JOINT REGISTRY THAT CONTAINS UNPUBLISHED COLLECTED DATA ON THE USAGE AND THE OUTCOMES OF THE ANKLE JOINT REPLACEMENT. THE REPORT DETAILS ANALYSIS PROVIDED FOR REVISION PROCEDURES PERFORMED FOR THE MONTHLY REPORT OF MAY 2026 DURING THE REVIEW OF THE REPORT, IT WAS IDENTIFIED THAT A PATIENT REQUIRED REVISION SURGERY DUE TO LYSIS OF TALUS WHICH WAS NOT PREVIOUSLY REPORTED TO THE MANUFACTURER.
Patient problems: Osteolysis
MAUDE report 25426047 ↗InjuryDec 23, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Osseointegration Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Osseointegration Problem
THE DIGITAL STRYKER PROPHECY TEAM RECEIVED A CT SCAN INDICATING THAT THE PATIENT MAY REQUIRE A REVISION SURGERY DUE TO A LARGE CYST IN THE TALUS.
Patient problems: Cyst(s); Inadequate Osseointegration
MAUDE report 23875449 ↗InjuryDec 17, 2025Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem
THE DIGITAL STRYKER PROPHECY TEAM RECEIVED A CT SCAN INDICATING THAT THE PATIENT REQUIRED A REVISION SURGERY "FOR PAIN AND LUCENCIES AROUND THE IMPLANT? INFECTION. DONE FOR POST-TRAUMATIC ARTHRITIS, PREVIOUS FRACTURE/ORIF/ROM. NO OBVIOUS PATIENT FACTORS BEYOND BEING A LITTLE OVERWEIGHT. BONE QUALITY WAS REASONABLY GOOD - A FEW CYSTIC AREAS AS PREDICTED. ACTIVITY LEVEL WAS RESTRICTED BY ANKLE SYMPTOMS. I THINK THE PATIENT WAS COMPLIANT WITH INSTRUCTIONS" THE PATIENT IS CURRENTLY IMPLANTED WITH A BONE CEMENT SPACER. IMAGING IDENTIFIED A POSTERIOR LINE FRACTURE PRESENT IN THE TIBIA AND RADIOPAQUE FEATURE IDENTIFIED IN THE TIBIA BONE (SCLEROTIC BONE). ADDITIONAL FEEDBACK FROM THE SURGEON STATED THAT "IT WOULD SEEM INFECTION IS NOT THE ISSUE CAUSING LOOSENING. IT DOESN'T APPEAR TO BE INFECTION."
Patient problems: Cyst(s); Inadequate Osseointegration; Limb Fracture; Pain
MAUDE report 23831915 ↗InjuryDec 15, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
THE MANUFACTURER RECEIVED A REPORT FROM THE NATIONAL JOINT REGISTRY THAT CONTAINS UNPUBLISHED COLLECTED DATA ON THE USAGE AND THE OUTCOMES OF THE ANKLE JOINT REPLACEMENT. THE REPORT DETAILS ANALYSIS PROVIDED FOR REVISION PROCEDURES PERFORMED FOR THE MONTHLY REPORT OF (B)(6) 2025 DURING THE REVIEW OF THE REPORT, IT WAS IDENTIFIED THAT A PATIENT REQUIRED REVISION SURGERY DUE TO ACTIVE INFECTION WHICH WAS NOT PREVIOUSLY REPORTED TO THE MANUFACTURER.
Patient problems: Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 23803990 ↗InjuryDec 4, 2025Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration
THE MANUFACTURER RECEIVED A REPORT FROM THE NATIONAL JOINT REGISTRY THAT CONTAINS UNPUBLISHED COLLECTED DATA ON THE USAGE AND THE OUTCOMES OF THE ANKLE JOINT REPLACEMENT. THE REPORT DETAILS ANALYSIS PROVIDED FOR REVISION PROCEDURES PERFORMED BETWEEN 2024 TO 2025. DURING THE REVIEW OF THE REPORT, IT WAS IDENTIFIED THAT ON (B)(6) 2025 A PATIENT REQUIRED REVISION SURGERY DUE TO ASEPTIC LOOSENING - TIBIAL COMPONENT, ASEPTIC LOOSENING - TALAR COMPONENT AND PERIPROSTHETIC FRACTURE, WHICH WAS NOT PREVIOUSLY REPORTED TO THE MANUFACTURER.
Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s); Osteolysis
MAUDE report 23713733 ↗InjuryDec 1, 2025Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration
THE MANUFACTURER RECEIVED A REPORT FROM THE NATIONAL JOINT REGISTRY THAT CONTAINS UNPUBLISHED COLLECTED DATA ON THE USAGE AND THE OUTCOMES OF THE ANKLE JOINT REPLACEMENT. THE REPORT DETAILS ANALYSIS PROVIDED FOR REVISION PROCEDURES PERFORMED BETWEEN 2024 TO 2025. DURING THE REVIEW OF THE REPORT, IT WAS IDENTIFIED THAT ON (B)(6) 2025 A PATIENT REQUIRED REVISION SURGERY DUE TO ASEPTIC LOOSENING OF TIBIAL COMPONENT AND ASEPTIC LOOSENING OF TALAR COMPONENT, MIGRATION AND DISSOCIATION, WHICH WAS NOT PREVIOUSLY REPORTED TO THE MANUFACTURER.
Patient problems: Osteolysis
MAUDE report 23687280 ↗InjuryDec 1, 2025Loss of Osseointegration; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Loss of Osseointegration; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
THE MANUFACTURER RECEIVED A REPORT FROM THE NATIONAL JOINT REGISTRY THAT CONTAINS UNPUBLISHED COLLECTED DATA ON THE USAGE AND THE OUTCOMES OF THE ANKLE JOINT REPLACEMENT. THE REPORT DETAILS ANALYSIS PROVIDED FOR REVISION PROCEDURES PERFORMED BETWEEN 2023 TO 2025. DURING THE REVIEW OF THE REPORT, IT WAS IDENTIFIED THAT ON (B)(6) 2025 A PATIENT REQUIRED REVISION SURGERY DUE TO ASEPTIC LOOSENING AND LYSIS IN TIBIAL COMPONENT AND LYSIS - TALUS, WHICH WAS NOT PREVIOUSLY REPORTED TO THE MANUFACTURER.
Patient problems: Osteolysis
MAUDE report 23687192 ↗InjuryOct 20, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
THE MANUFACTURER RECEIVED A REPORT FROM THE NATIONAL JOINT REGISTRY THAT CONTAINS UNPUBLISHED COLLECTED DATA ON THE USAGE AND THE OUTCOMES OF THE ANKLE JOINT REPLACEMENT. THE REPORT DETAILS ANALYSIS PROVIDED FOR REVISION PROCEDURES PERFORMED BETWEEN 2016 TO 2025. DURING THE REVIEW OF THE REPORT, IT WAS IDENTIFIED THAT ON (B)(6) 2025 A PATIENT REQUIRED REVISION SURGERY DUE TO UNEXPLAINED PAIN, WHICH WAS NOT PREVIOUSLY REPORTED TO THE MANUFACTURER.
Patient problems: Pain
MAUDE report 23335161 ↗InjurySep 4, 2025Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration
THE MANUFACTURER RECEIVED A REPORT FROM THE NATIONAL JOINT REGISTRY THAT CONTAINS UNPUBLISHED COLLECTED DATA ON THE USAGE AND THE OUTCOMES OF THE ANKLE JOINT REPLACEMENT. THE REPORT DETAILS ANALYSIS PROVIDED FOR REVISION PROCEDURES PERFORMED BETWEEN MAY 2025 TO JULY 2025. DURING THE REVIEW OF THE REPORT, IT WAS IDENTIFIED THAT ON (B)(6) 2025 A PATIENT REQUIRED REVISION SURGERY DUE TO ASEPTIC LOOSENING AND LYSIS OF TIBIAL AND TALAR COMPONENT, WHICH WAS NOT PREVIOUSLY REPORTED TO THE MANUFACTURER.
Patient problems: Osteolysis
MAUDE report 22963719 ↗InjurySep 4, 2025Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration
THE MANUFACTURER RECEIVED A REPORT FROM THE NATIONAL JOINT REGISTRY THAT CONTAINS UNPUBLISHED COLLECTED DATA ON THE USAGE AND THE OUTCOMES OF THE ANKLE JOINT REPLACEMENT. THE REPORT DETAILS ANALYSIS PROVIDED FOR REVISION PROCEDURES PERFORMED BETWEEN (B)(6) 2025 TO (B)(6) 2025. DURING THE REVIEW OF THE REPORT, IT WAS IDENTIFIED THAT ON (B)(6) 2025 A PATIENT REQUIRED REVISION SURGERY DUE TO ASEPTIC LOOSENING AND LYSIS IN TIBIAL COMPONENT AND LYSIS IN TALAR COMPONENT, WHICH WAS NOT PREVIOUSLY REPORTED TO THE MANUFACTURER.
Patient problems: Osteolysis
MAUDE report 22963521 ↗InjuryJun 26, 2025Loss of Osseointegration; Osseointegration Problem; Loss of Osseointegration; Osseointegration Problem
THE MANUFACTURER RECEIVED A REPORT FROM THE NATIONAL JOINT REGISTRY THAT CONTAINS UNPUBLISHED COLLECTED DATA ON THE USAGE AND THE OUTCOMES OF THE ANKLE JOINT REPLACEMENT. THE REPORT DETAILS ANALYSIS PROVIDED FOR REVISION PROCEDURES PERFORMED UNTIL (B)(6) 2024. DURING THE REVIEW OF THE REPORT, IT WAS IDENTIFIED THAT ON A PATIENT REQUIRED REVISION SURGERY DUE TO ASEPTIC LOOSENING OF TIBIAL COMPONENT, ASEPTIC LOOSENING OF TALAR COMPONENT, LYSIS OF TIBIA, LYSIS OF TALUS, WHICH WAS NOT PREVIOUSLY REPORTED TO THE MANUFACTURER.
Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration; Osteolysis
MAUDE report 22335168 ↗InjuryMay 21, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
THE MANUFACTURER RECEIVED A REPORT FROM THE NATIONAL JOINT REGISTRY THAT CONTAINS UNPUBLISHED COLLECTED DATA ON THE USAGE AND THE OUTCOMES OF THE ANKLE JOINT REPLACEMENT. THE REPORT DETAILS ANALYSIS PROVIDED FOR REVISION PROCEDURES PERFORMED UNTIL (B)(6) 2024. DURING THE REVIEW OF THE REPORT, IT WAS IDENTIFIED THAT ON (B)(6) 2024 A PATIENT REQUIRED REVISION SURGERY DUE TO INFECTION, WHICH WAS NOT PREVIOUSLY REPORTED TO THE MANUFACTURER.
Patient problems: Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 22059326 ↗InjuryMay 21, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
THE MANUFACTURER RECEIVED A REPORT FROM THE NATIONAL JOINT REGISTRY THAT CONTAINS UNPUBLISHED COLLECTED DATA ON THE USAGE AND THE OUTCOMES OF THE ANKLE JOINT REPLACEMENT. THE REPORT DETAILS ANALYSIS PROVIDED FOR REVISION PROCEDURES PERFORMED UNTIL (B)(6) 2024. DURING THE REVIEW OF THE REPORT, IT WAS IDENTIFIED THAT ON (B)(6) 2024 A PATIENT REQUIRED REVISION SURGERY DUE TO INFECTION & PERIPROSTHETIC FRACTURE, WHICH WAS NOT PREVIOUSLY REPORTED TO THE MANUFACTURER. REVISION PROCEDURE TYPE- STAGE 2 OF 2 STAGE REVISION.
Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s); Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 22059325 ↗InjuryMay 15, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
THE MANUFACTURER RECEIVED A REPORT FROM THE NATIONAL JOINT REGISTRY THAT CONTAINS UNPUBLISHED COLLECTED DATA ON THE USAGE AND THE OUTCOMES OF THE ANKLE JOINT REPLACEMENT. THE REPORT DETAILS ANALYSIS PROVIDED FOR REVISION PROCEDURES PERFORMED UNTIL (B)(6) 2024. DURING THE REVIEW OF THE REPORT, IT WAS IDENTIFIED THAT ON (B)(6) 2024 A PATIENT REQUIRED REVISION SURGERY DUE TO INFECTION - ACTIVE WHICH WAS NOT PREVIOUSLY REPORTED TO THE MANUFACTURER.
Patient problems: Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 22029941 ↗InjuryMay 15, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
THE MANUFACTURER RECEIVED A REPORT FROM THE NATIONAL JOINT REGISTRY THAT CONTAINS UNPUBLISHED COLLECTED DATA ON THE USAGE AND THE OUTCOMES OF THE ANKLE JOINT REPLACEMENT. THE REPORT DETAILS ANALYSIS PROVIDED FOR REVISION PROCEDURES PERFORMED UNTIL (B)(6) 2024. DURING THE REVIEW OF THE REPORT, IT WAS IDENTIFIED THAT ON (B)(6) 2024 A PATIENT REQUIRED REVISION SURGERY DUE TO MALALIGNMENT AND SOFT TISSUE IMPINGEMENT WHICH WAS NOT PREVIOUSLY REPORTED TO THE MANUFACTURER.
Patient problems: Joint Impingement; Subluxation
MAUDE report 22029938 ↗InjuryMay 15, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
THE MANUFACTURER RECEIVED A REPORT FROM THE NATIONAL JOINT REGISTRY THAT CONTAINS UNPUBLISHED COLLECTED DATA ON THE USAGE AND THE OUTCOMES OF THE ANKLE JOINT REPLACEMENT. THE REPORT DETAILS ANALYSIS PROVIDED FOR REVISION PROCEDURES PERFORMED BETWEEN MAY 2024-JUN 2024. DURING THE REVIEW OF THE REPORT, IT WAS IDENTIFIED THAT ON (B)(6) 2024 A PATIENT REQUIRED REVISION SURGERY DUE TO INFECTION-ACTIVE WHICH WAS NOT PREVIOUSLY REPORTED TO THE MANUFACTURER.
Patient problems: Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 22025584 ↗InjuryMay 14, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
AS REPORTED: "SUBJECT: (B)(6). UK INFINITY® TOTAL ANKLE SYSTEM STUDY. INCREASED PAIN AROUND MEDIAL SIDE OF ANKLE. PARTICIPANT JUMPED TO AVOID STRAY GOLF BALL LAST MONTH AND LANDED AWKWARDLY ON ANKLE. INTERMITTENT PAIN HAS BECOME REGULAR AROUND MEDIAL ANKLE AND INCREASED SWELLING. X-RAY SHOWS 'NOTHING UNTOWARD' WITH IMPLANT AND PARTICIPANT LISTED FOR CLEARING MEDIAL GUTTER OF BONE DUE (B)(6) 2025. UPDATE DATED 07 MAY 2025: SURGICAL INTERVENTION OCCURRED ON (B)(6) 2025 AS SCHEDULED. NO IMPLANT REMOVED. "
Patient problems: Pain
MAUDE report 22020804 ↗InjuryMay 13, 2025Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem
THE MANUFACTURER RECEIVED A REPORT FROM THE NATIONAL JOINT REGISTRY THAT CONTAINS UNPUBLISHED COLLECTED DATA ON THE USAGE AND THE OUTCOMES OF THE ANKLE JOINT REPLACEMENT. THE REPORT DETAILS ANALYSIS PROVIDED FOR REVISION PROCEDURES PERFORMED BETWEEN (B)(6) 2024. DURING REVIEW OF THE REPORT, IT WAS IDENTIFIED THAT ON (B)(6) 2024, A PATIENT REQUIRED REVISION SURGERY DUE TO ASEPTIC LOOSENING OF THE TALAR COMPONENT, AND LYSIS OF TALUS COMPONENT, WHICH HAD NOT PREVIOUSLY BEEN REPORTED TO THE MANUFACTURER. STATE 1 OF 2 STAGE REVISION.
Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration; Osteolysis
MAUDE report 22013377 ↗InjuryMay 2, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
AS REPORTED: "STUDY: UK INFINITY® TOTAL ANKLE SYSTEM SUBJECT: (B)(6). EXCESSIVE PAIN & SWELLING LEFT ANKLE. SLIGHT ERYTHEMA IN THE ANTERIOR ASPECT OF LEFT LOWER LEG WITH SLIGHT TENDERNESS ON PALPITATION. INFECTION. PERSISTENT SWELLING. PATIENT REQUIRED MEDICATION AND SURGERY."
Patient problems: Bacterial Infection; Implant Pain; Swelling/ Edema
MAUDE report 21948102 ↗InjuryMay 1, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
AS REPORTED: "SUBJECT: (B)(6). UK INFINITY TOTAL ANKLE SYSTEM STUDY. (B)(6) 2024 - START UP STIFFNESS. SMALL DEGREE OF START UP STIFFNESS LASTING ONLY 10 STEPS OR SO. PREVIOUSLY NO COMPLAINTS OF STIFFNESS AT ALL FOLLOW-UP APPOINTMENTS. AT VISIT PATIENT REPORTED STIFFNESS. X-RAYS FROM VISIT ON (B)(6) 2024 SHOW DEGREE OF LICENCE AND PREVIOUSLY IDENTIFIED OSTEOCYTES BUT NO CHANGE FROM LAST X-RAYS."
Patient problems: Loss of Range of Motion
MAUDE report 21945036 ↗InjuryApr 23, 2025Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem
THE MANUFACTURER RECEIVED A REPORT FROM THE NATIONAL JOINT REGISTRY THAT CONTAINS UNPUBLISHED COLLECTED DATA ON THE USAGE AND THE OUTCOMES OF THE ANKLE JOINT REPLACEMENT. THE REPORT DETAILS ANALYSIS PROVIDED FOR REVISION PROCEDURES PERFORMED UNTIL (B)(6) 2025. DURING THE REVIEW OF THE REPORT, IT WAS IDENTIFIED THAT ON (B)(6) 2024 A PATIENT REQUIRED REVISION SURGERY DUE TO ASEPTIC LOOSENING OF TIBIAL COMPONENT AND STIFFNESS, WHICH WAS NOT PREVIOUSLY REPORTED TO THE MANUFACTURER.
Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration; Loss of Range of Motion
MAUDE report 21888256 ↗InjuryApr 3, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
THE MANUFACTURER RECEIVED A REPORT FROM THE NATIONAL JOINT REGISTRY THAT CONTAINS UNPUBLISHED COLLECTED DATA ON THE USAGE AND THE OUTCOMES OF THE ANKLE JOINT REPLACEMENT. THE REPORT DETAILS ANALYSIS PROVIDED FOR REVISION PROCEDURES PERFORMED UNTIL ON (B)(6) 2025. DURING THE REVIEW OF THE REPORT, IT WAS IDENTIFIED THAT ON (B)(6) 2024 A PATIENT REQUIRED REVISION SURGERY DUE TO UNEXPLAINED PAIN, STIFFNESS AND SOFT TISSUE IMPINGEMENT, WHICH WAS NOT PREVIOUSLY REPORTED TO THE MANUFACTURER.
Patient problems: Capsular Contracture; Joint Impingement; Pain
MAUDE report 21764840 ↗InjuryApr 3, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
THE MANUFACTURER RECEIVED A REPORT FROM THE NATIONAL JOINT REGISTRY THAT CONTAINS UNPUBLISHED COLLECTED DATA ON THE USAGE AND THE OUTCOMES OF THE ANKLE JOINT REPLACEMENT. THE REPORT DETAILS ANALYSIS PROVIDED FOR REVISION PROCEDURES PERFORMED UNTIL (B)(6) 2025. DURING THE REVIEW OF THE REPORT, IT WAS IDENTIFIED THAT ON (B)(6) 2025 A PATIENT REQUIRED REVISION SURGERY DUE TO MALALIGNMENT, UNEXPLAINED PAIN AND PERIPROSTHETIC FRACTURE, WHICH WAS NOT PREVIOUSLY REPORTED TO THE MANUFACTURER.
Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s); Implant Pain; Subluxation
MAUDE report 21760798 ↗
Other PROSTHESIS, ANKLE, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER devices
- Vantage 350-22-03Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Ankle, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Metal/Polymer2 recalls2 reports
- Vantage 350-21-04Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Ankle, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Metal/Polymer2 recalls0 reports
- INFINITY 33600020Wright Medical Technology, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, ANKLE, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER1 recall9 reports
- INFINITY 33650003Wright Medical Technology, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, ANKLE, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER55 reports
- Vantage 350-22-02Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Ankle, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Metal/Polymer1 recall5 reports
- INFINITY 33630022Wright Medical Technology, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, ANKLE, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER54 reports
- Vantage 350-21-02Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Ankle, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Metal/Polymer1 recall4 reports
- INFINITY 33600030Wright Medical Technology, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, ANKLE, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER1 recall4 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 13, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 13, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page