Skip to content

enableCV EndoReturn™ Arterial Cannula ER21BRecalls & reported problems

Enablecv Inc. · EndoReturn™ Arterial Cannula - ER21B · Class 2

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
1
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 00840479401218), received between Jun 12, 2026 and Jun 12, 2026 — classified as 1 death.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Use of Device Problem” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 1 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Use of Device Problem1

Patient problems

  • Aortic dissection1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • DeathJun 12, 2026Use of Device Problem

    A EVENT LEADING TO DEATH WAS REPORTED TO BE POSSIBLY ASSOCIATED WITH THE USE OF THE ER21B CANNULA AND ICF100 CATHETER. THE PHYSICIAN INITIALLY THOUGHT THE PATIENT'S VESSEL WAS TOO SMALL, BUT THEN THE SURGEON CUT THE VESSEL DOWN AND DECIDED TO MOVE FORWARD WITH THE USE OF THE ICF100. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE GUIDEWIRE POSSIBLY GOT CAUGHT AT SOME POINT IN THE VESSEL (IT IS UNCLEAR IF THAT IS THE WIRE FOR THE ENDORETURN OR THE ICF100). THE ICF100 WAS NOT YET INFLATED. IT ALSO IS PRESUMED THAT SURGICAL TECHNIQUE OR AN ANOMALY WITH THE WIRE COULD HAVE BEEN RELATED TO THE EVENT, THOUGH NO ABNORMALITIES OR ANOMALIES WERE REPORTED. NO RESISTANCE MENTIONED DURING ADVANCEMENT. ISSUE WAS NOT NOTICED UNTIL THE ICF100 WAS IN THE ASCENDING (PRIOR TO INFLATION). PREOP SCAN WAS WHEN THE PATIENT WAS SITTING UP SO THE DOCTOR DIDN'T GET A GOOD FEMORAL VIEW PRIOR TO THE PROCEDURE. ULTRASOUND BEFORE PROCEDURE OF FEMORAL VESSELS WAS APPROXIMATE FOR MEASUREMENT (6.8 MM). WHEN THEY DID THE CUT DOWN, THEY THOUGHT THE VESSEL WAS LARGE ENOUGH. SURGEON CANNULATED WITH ER21B FOLLOWED BY PLACEMENT OF INTRACLUDE. SHORTLY AFTER LEFT AND RIGHT RADIAL PRESSURES WENT TO 0 AND TEE CONFIRMED A RETROGRADE AORTIC DISSEC

    Patient problems: Aortic dissection

    MAUDE report 25486855 ↗

Other Catheter, Cannula And Tubing, Vascular, Cardiopulmonary Bypass devices

All Catheter, Cannula And Tubing, Vascular, Cardiopulmonary Bypass devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page