ICU Medical CH3381Recalls & reported problems
Icu Medical, Inc. · 16" (41 cm) Appx 4.4 ml, Ext Set w/MicroClave™, 0.2 Micron Filter, Clave™, Spiros™, Clamp · Class 2
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 2
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00840619066284), received between Feb 3, 2020 and Feb 3, 2020 — classified as 2 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Fluid/Blood Leak” (2 reports).
1 other recall cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K070532); they may or may not involve this specific model.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Fluid/Blood Leak2
Patient problems
- Chemical Exposure2
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient2
Recent adverse event reports
The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionFeb 3, 2020Fluid/Blood Leak; Fluid/Blood Leak
THE EVENT INVOLVED A 16" (41 CM) APPX 4.4 ML, EXT SET W/MICROCLAVE®, 0.2 MICRON FILTER, CLAVE®, SPIROS®, CLAMP THAT THE CUSTOMER REPORTED A LEAK OF ETOPOSIDE FROM THE AIR VENTS OF THE 0.2 MICRON FILTER. THE 24 HOUR ETOPOSIDE INFUSION WAS ADMINISTERING VIA A SECONDARY ADMINISTRATION SET THAT WAS LUER LOCKED INTO THE BD PRIMARY LINE AT THE UPPER Y-SITE. THE CUSTOMER REPORTED THE 16" (41 CM) APPX 4.4 ML, EXT SET W/MICROCLAVE®, 0.2 MICRON FILTER, CLAVE®, SPIROS®, CLAMP WAS ATTACHED TO THE DISTAL END OF THE BD PRIMARY LINE AND WAS LUER LOCKED INTO THE PATIENT¿S PORT. DURING THE 13TH HOUR OF THE INFUSION THE NURSE IDENTIFIED THE LEAK DURING HER HOURLY LINE CHECK. IT WAS IDENTIFIED THAT THE FILTER WAS IN THE UPRIGHT POSITION HANGING FROM THE PATIENT¿S PORT (INLET OVER OUTLET). IT WAS MENTIONED THE SAFETY PIN WAS USED TO SECURE THE SET TO THE PATIENT CLOTHING DURING ADMINISTRATION IN ORDER TO KEEP THE FILTER IN THE RIGHT ORIENTATION. NEITHER THE NURSE NOR THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED ADVERSE EVENTS, HOWEVER BOTH EXPERIENCED ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE. THERE WAS PATIENT INVOLVEMENT, HOWEVER, NO REPORT OF ADVERSE EVENT.
Patient problems: Chemical Exposure; No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 9662228 ↗MalfunctionFeb 3, 2020Fluid/Blood Leak; Fluid/Blood Leak
THE EVENT INVOLVED A 16" (41 CM) APPX 4.4 ML, EXT SET W/MICROCLAVE®, 0.2 MICRON FILTER, CLAVE®, SPIROS®, CLAMP THAT THE CUSTOMER REPORTED A LEAK OF ETOPOSIDE FROM THE AIR VENTS OF THE 0.2 MICRON FILTER. THE 24 HOUR ETOPOSIDE INFUSION WAS ADMINISTERING VIA A SECONDARY ADMINISTRATION SET THAT WAS LUER LOCKED INTO THE BD PRIMARY LINE AT THE UPPER Y-SITE. THE CUSTOMER REPORTED THE 16" (41 CM) APPX 4.4 ML, EXT SET W/MICROCLAVE®, 0.2 MICRON FILTER, CLAVE®, SPIROS®, CLAMP WAS ATTACHED TO THE DISTAL END OF THE BD PRIMARY LINE AND WAS LUER LOCKED INTO THE PATIENT¿S PORT. DURING THE 13TH HOUR OF THE INFUSION THE NURSE IDENTIFIED THE LEAK DURING HER HOURLY LINE CHECK. IT WAS IDENTIFIED THAT THE FILTER WAS IN THE INVERTED POSITION HANGING FROM THE PATIENT¿S PORT (OUTLET OVER INLET). NEITHER THE NURSE NOR THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED ADVERSE EVENTS, HOWEVER BOTH EXPERIENCED ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE. THERE WAS PATIENT INVOLVEMENT, HOWEVER, NO REPORT OF ADVERSE EVENT.
Patient problems: Chemical Exposure; No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 9662150 ↗
Recalls under the same FDA submission
These recalls involve devices cleared under K070532. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.
- Z-0699-2021 · Aug 31, 2020 · Open, Classified42 IN (107 cm) Appx 5.0 ml, 20 Drop Admin Set, Spiros, REF: 20131-01; 31" (79 cm) Admin Set w/20 Drop Integrated Clave Drip Chamber, Spiros, Bag Hanger Drop-in Red Cap, 4 Units, RE
Other Set, administration, intravascular devices
- Autosoft XC 1001680Unomedical A/S · Set, Administration, Intravascular1 death16,105 reports
- Autosoft90™ 1002817Unomedical A/S · Set, Administration, Intravascular1 recall11,907 reports
- Minimed™ Quick-set™ MMT-399AUnomedical A/S · Set, Administration, Intravascular9 deaths8,669 reports
- Medtronic Extended MMT-431AUnomedical A/S · Set, Administration, Intravascular3 deaths8,574 reports
- MiniMed™ Mio™ Advance MMT-242AUnomedical A/S · Set, Administration, Intravascular15 deaths8,164 reports
- CADD 21-7302-24Icu Medical, Inc. · Set, administration, intravascular4 recalls1 death4,657 reports
- Autosoft XC 1001681Unomedical A/S · Set, Administration, Intravascular1 death4,216 reports
- Minimed™ Quick-set™ MMT-397AUnomedical A/S · Set, Administration, Intravascular19 deaths4,134 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page