ProCol Biologic Vascular Graft HJL016-40-NRecalls & reported problems
Lemaitre Vascular, Inc. · ProCol Biologic Vascular Graft, 6mm x 40 cm · Class 3 · Implant
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 13
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 2
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 13 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00840663108688), received between Sep 22, 2016 and Feb 19, 2020 — classified as 2 injuries, 11 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Integrity Problem” (7 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Material Integrity Problem7
- Fluid/Blood Leak2
- Device Damaged Prior to Use1
- Improper Flow or Infusion1
- Occlusion Within Device1
- Physical Property Issue1
- Structural Problem1
Patient problems
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient4
- Aneurysm3
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient3
- Failure of Implant1
- No Information1
- No Patient Involvement1
- Occlusion1
Recent adverse event reports
The 13 most recent of 13 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionFeb 19, 2020Structural Problem
SURGEON USED A PROCOL VASCULAR BIOPROSTHESIS FOR CREATING A BRIDGE GRAFT FOR VASCULAR ACCESS IN A DIALYSIS PATIENT. AFTER COMPLETION OF ARTERIAL ANASTOMOSIS, WHEN SURGEON REMOVED THE CLAMP AND THE GRAFT WAS UNDER ARTERIAL PRESSURE, HE OBSERVED THE PROXIMAL END OF THE GRAFT HAD DILATED.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 9729589 ↗MalfunctionOct 18, 2019Material Integrity Problem; Material Integrity Problem
SURGEON USED A PROCOL VASCULAR BIOPROSTHESIS FOR CREATING A BRIDGE GRAFT FOR VASCULAR ACCESS TO A DIALYSIS PATIENT. AFTER SURGEON COMPLETED THE ARTERIAL ANASTOMOSIS, UPON PRESSURIZING THE GRAFT, HE OBSERVED ANEURYSMAL SPOT AT TWO DIFFERENT SUTURE TIES IN THE GRAFT. THERE WAS NO INJURY TO THE PATIENT AS THE RESULT OF THIS INCIDENT.
Patient problems: Aneurysm
MAUDE report 9209471 ↗MalfunctionOct 16, 2019Material Integrity Problem; Material Integrity Problem
SURGEON USED A PROCOL VASCULAR BIOPROSTHESIS FOR CREATING A BRIDGE GRAFT FOR VASCULAR ACCESS TO A DIALYSIS PATIENT. AFTER SURGEON COMPLETED THE ARTERIAL ANASTOMOSIS, UPON PRESSURIZING THE GRAFT, HE OBSERVED ANEURYSMAL SPOT AT THREE DIFFERENT SUTURE TIES IN THE GRAFT.
Patient problems: Aneurysm
MAUDE report 9198734 ↗MalfunctionOct 11, 2019Material Integrity Problem; Material Integrity Problem
SURGEON USED A PROCOL VASCULAR BIOPROSTHESIS FOR CREATING A BRIDGE GRAFT FOR VASCULAR ACCESS TO A DIALYSIS PATIENT. AFTER SURGEON COMPLETED THE ARTERIAL ANASTOMOSIS, UPON PRESSURIZING THE GRAFT, HE OBSERVED AN ANEURYSMAL SPOT ON THE GRAFT. SURGEON REPAIRED THE GRAFT AND CONTINUED WITH THE SURGERY. THERE WAS NO INJURY TO THE PATIENT AS THE RESULT OF THIS INCIDENT.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 9182637 ↗MalfunctionOct 11, 2019Material Integrity Problem; Material Integrity Problem
WHILE RINSING THE GRAFT, SURGEON NOTICED A THIN WALL SPOT ON THE GRAFT NEXT TO THE SUTURE TIE. THE GRAFT ALSO APPEARED TO BE ANEURYSMAL AT THE REGION OF THE SUTURE TIE. GRAFT WAS NOT IMPLANTED.
Patient problems: Aneurysm
MAUDE report 9181236 ↗MalfunctionOct 7, 2019Material Integrity Problem; Material Integrity Problem
SURGEON USED A PROCOL VASCULAR BIOPROSTHESIS FOR CREATING A BRIDGE GRAFT FOR VASCULAR ACCESS TO A DIALYSIS PATIENT. AFTER SURGEON COMPLETED THE ARTERIAL ANASTOMOSIS, UPON PRESSURIZING THE GRAFT, HE OBSERVED MULTIPLE KINKS ON THE GRAFT. HE STATED THAT THE SUTURES WERE TIED DOWN EXTREMELY TIGHT WHICH COULD HAVE CAUSED THE GRAFT TO KINK AT THESE SPOTS. THERE WAS NO INJURY TO THE PATIENT AS THE RESULT OF THIS INCIDENT.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 9163916 ↗MalfunctionOct 7, 2019Material Integrity Problem; Material Integrity Problem
SURGEON USED A PROCOL VASCULAR BIOPROSTHESIS FOR CREATING A BRIDGE GRAFT FOR VASCULAR ACCESS TO A DIALYSIS PATIENT. AFTER SURGEON COMPLETED THE ARTERIAL ANASTOMOSIS, UPON PRESSURIZING THE GRAFT, HE OBSERVED AN ANEURYSMAL SPOT ON THE GRAFT. SURGEON REPAIRED THE GRAFT AND CONTINUED WITH THE SURGERY. THERE WAS NO INJURY TO THE PATIENT AS THE RESULT OF THIS INCIDENT.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 9163915 ↗MalfunctionSep 13, 2019Material Integrity Problem; Material Integrity Problem
SURGEON USED A PROCOL VASCULAR BIOPROSTHESIS FOR CREATING A BRIDGE GRAFT FOR VASCULAR ACCESS TO A DIALYSIS PATIENT. AFTER SURGEON COMPLETED THE ARTERIAL ANASTOMOSIS, UPON PRESSURIZING THE GRAFT, HE OBSERVED AN ANEURYSMAL SPOT ON THE GRAFT. SURGEON TRIMMED A DISTAL END OF THE GRAFT AND USED IT TO PATCH THIS SPOT. THERE WAS NO INJURY TO THE PATIENT AS THE RESULT OF THIS INCIDENT.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 9047333 ↗MalfunctionMar 22, 2019Device Damaged Prior to Use
DURING PRE-USE CHECK, SURGEON OBSERVED THE DISTAL SECTION OF THE GRAFT TO HAVE DILATED.
Patient problems: No Patient Involvement
MAUDE report 8445484 ↗InjuryOct 31, 2018Improper Flow or Infusion; Improper Flow or Infusion
THE GRAFT DILATED AT THE ARTERIAL END ONCE THE BLOOD FLOW WAS INTRODUCED INTO THE GRAFT AFTER PERFORMING THE ARTERIAL ANASTOMOSIS.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 8025977 ↗InjuryJan 12, 2018Occlusion Within Device; Occlusion Within Device
THE PROCOL VASCULAR BIOPROSTHESIS GRAFT WAS PLACED IN THE LOWER RIGHT ARM FOR AV ACCESS. AFTER THREE WEEKS OF IMPLANT, WHEN DOCTOR ATTEMPTED TO DECLOT THE GRAFT, HE FOUND THAT THE GRAFT HAD OCCLUDED AT THE APEX OF THE GRAFT. HE ALSO FOUND A HOLE IN THE GRAFT. SO, HE SEWED BOTH ENDS AND ABANDONED THE GRAFT.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Occlusion
MAUDE report 7187515 ↗MalfunctionDec 27, 2016Fluid/Blood Leak; Fluid/Blood Leak
WHEN THE SURGICAL TECH WAS FLUSHING THE GRAFT, HE NOTICED THE GRAFT WAS LEAKING FROM THE MIDPOINT OF THE GRAFT. SO, HE CLAMPED THE DISTAL END AND LIGHTLY FLUSHED THE GRAFT, WHICH THEN SHOWED DIFFUSE WEEPING FROM MULTIPLE AREAS. NO OBVIOUS DEFECT WAS NOTED. THE GRAFT WAS THEN DISCARDED AND THEN ANOTHER GRAFT WAS USED. THE GRAFT WAS NOT USED IN THE PATIENT.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 6207935 ↗MalfunctionSep 22, 2016Fluid/Blood Leak; Physical Property Issue; Fluid/Blood Leak; Physical Property Issue
DURING IMPLANTATION OF THE GRAFT, THE SURGEON PRESSURIZED IT AND NOTICED THAT A ONE INCH SECTION NEAR THE END APPEARED THIN, LIGHTER IN COLOR AND STARTED TO SLIGHTLY LEAK. THE DOCTOR REMOVED THE GRAFT AND USED A DIFFERENT GRAFT IN STOCK WITHOUT FURTHER INCIDENT.
Patient problems: No Information
MAUDE report 5970207 ↗
Other Tissue Graft Of 6mm And Greater devices
- Artegraft Vascular Graft AG 740Lemaitre Vascular, Inc. · Tissue Graft Of 6mm And Greater2 recalls5 reports
- Artegraft Vascular Graft AG 1015Lemaitre Vascular, Inc. · Tissue Graft Of 6mm And Greater2 recalls0 reports
- Artegraft Vascular Graft AG 636Lemaitre Vascular, Inc. · Tissue Graft Of 6mm And Greater1 recall5 reports
- Artegraft Vascular Graft AG 640Lemaitre Vascular, Inc. · Tissue Graft Of 6mm And Greater1 recall4 reports
- Artegraft Vascular Graft AG 730Lemaitre Vascular, Inc. · Tissue Graft Of 6mm And Greater1 recall3 reports
- Artegraft Vascular Graft AG 630Lemaitre Vascular, Inc. · Tissue Graft Of 6mm And Greater1 recall2 reports
- Artegraft Vascular Graft AG 750Lemaitre Vascular, Inc. · Tissue Graft Of 6mm And Greater1 recall2 reports
- Artegraft Vascular Graft AG 745Lemaitre Vascular, Inc. · Tissue Graft Of 6mm And Greater1 recall2 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page