Skip to content

AZUR VACULAR PLUG 45-180500Recalls & reported problems

Microvention, Inc. · AZUR VACULAR PLUG · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00842429101612), received between Sep 24, 2021 and Jan 24, 2026 — classified as 2 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Migration” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 1 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Migration1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJan 24, 2026Migration

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT WAS SUBMITTED TO A PRE EVAR INFERIOR MESENTERIC ARTERY EMBOLIZATION. THE PLUG SELECTED FOR TREATMENT MIGRATED. A SNARE WAS USED TO REMOVE IT. THE IMA WAS THEN EMBOLIZED WITH COILS. THE PROCEDURE WAS SUCCESSFUL.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24174897 ↗
  • InjurySep 24, 2021Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT AN AZUR VASCULAR PLUG WAS USED IN A GDA EMBOLIZATION CASE. THE PLUG WAS DEPLOYED WITHOUT ISSUE AND THERE WAS STASIS AT THE END OF THE CASE. TWO WEEKS AFTER IMPLANTATION, THE PATIENT RETURNED FOR A FOLLOW UP AND THE VESSEL WAS NO LONGER OCCLUDED. AN ADDITIONAL EMBOLIZATION WAS REQUIRED TWO WEEKS POST TREATMENT. THERE WAS NO REPORTED INJURY TO THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 12528602 ↗

Other Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization devices

All Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page