Stent FRED3507-PMARecalls & reported problems
Microvention, Inc. · FRED 27 · Class 3 · Implant
All models of Stent (63)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
1 open recall names this device. See the recall details and contact the manufacturer or your healthcare provider.
- Adverse event reports
- 3
- Deaths reported
- 1
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 1
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00842429106655), received between Aug 14, 2020 and Nov 26, 2020 — classified as 1 death, 1 injury, 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Retraction Problem” (1 report).
1 FDA recall record name this device's identifier, 1 still open.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Recalls naming this device
- Jun 7, 2023Open, Classified
Intracranial aneurysm flow diverter device may be manufactured with an incorrect inner stent length and may not perform as intended.
Z-2238-2023 · Root cause: Process control · Recall details · FDA record ↗
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem2
- Retraction Problem1
Patient problems
- Thrombus2
- Death1
- Hemorrhage, Cerebral1
- Neurological Deficit/Dysfunction1
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
Recent adverse event reports
The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionNov 26, 2020Retraction Problem; Retraction Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT AFTER THE FRED WAS DEPLOYED, THE DELIVERY WIRE BECAME CAUGHT ON THE STENT DURING RETRACTION. THE DELIVERY WIRE WAS ABLE TO RELEASE FROM THE STENT WITHOUT ADDITIONAL INTERVENTION. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 10909405 ↗DeathSep 4, 2020Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT TREATMENT WAS PERFORMED FOR AN UNRUPTURED RIGHT INTERNAL CAROTID ARTERY (ICA) TERMINUS ANEURYSM. THE FRED DEVICE WAS PLACED IN THE ICA TO THE ORIGIN OF THE A1 SEGMENT, ACROSS THE MIDDLE CEREBRAL ARTERY (MCA). UPON COMPLETION OF THE PROCEDURE, IT APPEARED THAT THE MCA TERRITORY WAS NOT FILLING. THROMBUS WAS IDENTIFIED IN THE BLOOD VESSEL. INTEGRILIN WAS ADMINISTERED IMMEDIATELY, WHICH RESTORED FLOW WITHIN 15-20 MINUTES. IN SEVERAL HOURS AFTER THE PROCEDURE, AN INTRACEREBRAL HEMORRHAGE (ICH) WAS IDENTIFIED IN THE LEFT HEMISPHERE, WHICH WAS ON THE CONTRALATERAL SIDE FROM THE IMPLANTED DEVICE. THE PATIENT DIED THE NEXT DAY ON (B)(6) 2020 FROM A CEREBRAL HEMATOMA ON THE CONTRA-LATERAL SIDE. THE DEATH WAS REPORTED TO BE RELATED TO THE INTEGRILIN TREATMENT. NO DEVICE MALFUNCTION OR INFORMATION SUGGESTING THAT THE DEVICE MAY HAVE CAUSED OR CONTRIBUTED TO THE ADVERSE EVENT AND PATIENT DEATH WAS REPORTED TO THE MANUFACTURER.
Patient problems: Death; Hemorrhage, Cerebral; Thrombus
MAUDE report 10497723 ↗InjuryAug 14, 2020Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT ELECTIVE TREATMENT WAS PERFORMED FOR AN INTERNAL CAROTID ARTERY (ICA) ANEURYSM. THE PATIENT WAS ON DAPT (ASPIRIN AND BRILINTA). DEPLOYMENT OF THE FRED WENT WELL AND THE PATIENT DID WELL DURING THE PROCEDURE. 48 HOURS POST-PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT HAD A STROKE WITH SEVERE HAND WEAKNESS AND MILD ARM WEAKNESS ON THE LEFT. AN ANGIOGRAM WAS PERFORMED, WHICH DEMONSTRATED AN OCCLUSION WITHIN THE FRED. INTEGRILIN AND TPA WERE DELIVERED INTRA-ARTERIALLY WITHOUT EFFECT; HOWEVER, ANGIOGRAPHY SHOWED THERE WAS GOOD FLOW ACROSS THE ACOM, FILLING THE MCA TERRITORY, SO MECHANICAL THROMBECTOMY INSIDE THE STENT WAS NOT ATTEMPTED. THE STENT REMAINS COMPLETELY OCCLUDED. THE PATIENT HAS HAD SLOW IMPROVEMENT OF THE STROKE SYMPTOMS, BUT THERE ARE STILL REMAINING DEFICITS THAT ARE ANTICIPATED TO GET BETTER OVER WEEKS WITH REHAB AND TIME.
Patient problems: Neurological Deficit/Dysfunction; Thrombus
MAUDE report 10411670 ↗
Other Intracranial aneurysm flow diverter devices
- Pipeline TM Flex Embolization Device with Shield Technology TM PED2-300-12Micro Therapeutics, Inc. · Intracranial aneurysm flow diverter2 recalls1 report
- PIPELINE PED-500-20Micro Therapeutics, Inc. · Intracranial aneurysm flow diverter1 recall31 reports
- PIPELINE PED-500-35Micro Therapeutics, Inc. · Intracranial aneurysm flow diverter1 recall1 death29 reports
- PIPELINE PED-500-16Micro Therapeutics, Inc. · Intracranial aneurysm flow diverter1 recall2 deaths27 reports
- PIPELINE PED-500-25Micro Therapeutics, Inc. · Intracranial aneurysm flow diverter1 recall1 death23 reports
- PIPELINE PED-500-30Micro Therapeutics, Inc. · Intracranial aneurysm flow diverter1 recall21 reports
- PIPELINE PED-450-25Micro Therapeutics, Inc. · Intracranial aneurysm flow diverter1 recall20 reports
- PIPELINE PED-475-30Micro Therapeutics, Inc. · Intracranial aneurysm flow diverter1 recall1 death19 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026 · each recall links to the FDA recall notice
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page