TORNIER PERFORM™ HUMERAL SYSTEM DWP2390Recalls & reported problems
Tornier, Inc. · Class 2 · Implant
All models of TORNIER PERFORM HUMERAL SYSTEM (68)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 9
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 9
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 9 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00846832084487), received between Jan 19, 2023 and May 29, 2026 — classified as 9 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Dislodged or Dislocated” (3 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem6
- Device Dislodged or Dislocated3
- Material Fragmentation1
- Noise, Audible1
- Unstable1
Patient problems
- Joint Dislocation3
- Loss of Range of Motion2
- Pain2
- Unspecified Infection2
- Bone Fracture(s)1
- Discomfort1
- Inadequate Osseointegration1
- Joint Laxity1
Recent adverse event reports
The 9 most recent of 9 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryMay 29, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
AS REPORTED: "BECAUSE THE PATIENT WAS EXPERIENCING PAIN, A REVISION SURGERY WAS PERFORMED TO DETERMINE IF THE IMPLANT WAS LOOSE OR NEEDED RESIZING. A SLIGHT FOREIGN BODY REACTION SUGGESTIVE OF INFECTION WAS OBSERVED."
Patient problems: Pain; Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 25337042 ↗InjuryOct 21, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A REVISION SURGERY WAS PERFORMED USING THE BLUEPRINT PLANNING FEATURE. THE PATIENT HAD PREVIOUSLY UNDERGONE A PRIMARY SHOULDER PROCEDURE INVOLVING STRYKER/TORNIER IMPLANTS. FOLLOWING THE INITIAL SURGERY, THE PATIENT DEVELOPED AN INFECTION, AND ALL IMPLANTS WERE EXPLANTED WITH PLACEMENT OF AN ANTIBIOTIC SPACER. THE REVISION PROCEDURE INVOLVED REMOVAL OF THE SPACER AND CONVERSION TO A REVERSE SHOULDER ARTHROPLASTY.
Patient problems: Post Operative Wound Infection
MAUDE report 23349499 ↗InjuryOct 3, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT; REVISION SURGERY WAS PERFORMED ON PATIENT FOR POSTOPERATIVE SUBCUTANEOUS INFECTION. THERE IS A SUSPICION OF INFECTION WITH ACNE BACTERIA, AND TESTS ARE CURRENTLY BEING CONDUCTED. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PERFORMED.
Patient problems: Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 23210451 ↗InjuryAug 21, 2024Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION SURGERY PERFORMED ON THE SAME DAY AS THE ORIGINAL SURGERY DUE TO DISLOCATION IN POST-ANESTHESIA CARE.
Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration; Joint Dislocation
MAUDE report 20019673 ↗InjuryApr 16, 2024Material Fragmentation; Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Noise, Audible; Material Fragmentation; Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Noise, Audible
A PATIENT UNDERWENT SURGERY FOR SHOULDER ISSUES, EXPERIENCING POPPING SENSATIONS. A SIGNIFICANT POP OCCURRED WHILE LIFTING A 50-POUND BAG OF FEED, LEADING TO THE DISCOVERY OF POLY DISSOCIATION WITH METAL FRAGMENTS VISIBLE ON X-RAY. SURGERY WAS PERFORMED TO REMOVE OLD POLY AND DEBRIS AND REPLACE IT WITH NEW POLY. POST-OP X-RAYS SHOWED FAVORABLE RESULTS. THE HOSPITAL REQUIRED THE IMPLANT TO BE TESTED BY PATHOLOGY, WITH THE PATIENT EXPECTING TO RECEIVE IT BACK IN A COUPLE OF WEEKS. NOTABLE CIRCUMSTANCES INCLUDE THE PATIENT'S ACTIVE LIFESTYLE AS A FARMER. SOME DEBRIS WAS OBSERVED INITIALLY BUT APPEARED TO HAVE BEEN SUCCESSFULLY REMOVED DURING THE PROCEDURE.
Patient problems: Joint Dislocation
MAUDE report 19120377 ↗InjuryJan 30, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IN THE PHS STEMLESS IDE STUDY, A PARTICIPANT REPORTED STIFFNESS AND DISCOMFORT IN THE NECK AND LEFT HAND. DESPITE RECEIVING TREATMENTS LIKE MELOXICAM AND ORAL STEROIDS, THE SYMPTOMS PERSISTED. SEEKING A SECOND OPINION FROM A HAND SPECIALIST, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A STEROID INJECTION IN THE LEFT RING AND LONG FINGERS. DISSATISFIED WITH THE PROGRESS AND CARE, THE PARTICIPANT WAS REFERRED TO ANOTHER HAND SURGEON FOR FURTHER EVALUATION, INCLUDING PENDING EMG AND CERVICAL MRI. THE PATIENT ATTRIBUTES THE SYMPTOMS TO A PREVIOUS SHOULDER SURGERY, EXPRESSING CERTAINTY THAT IT IS THE ROOT CAUSE.
Patient problems: Discomfort; Loss of Range of Motion
MAUDE report 18609094 ↗InjurySep 12, 2023Unstable; Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Unstable; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED CHRONIC DISLOCATION AND INSTABILITY, LEADING TO TWO REVISION SURGERIES.
Patient problems: Joint Dislocation; Joint Laxity
MAUDE report 17730899 ↗InjuryJul 12, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT HAD A SCAPULAR FRACTURE. PATIENT EXPERIENCED SHOULDER PAIN. PATIENT CONTACTED SURGEON AND WAS INSTRUCTED TO GO TO ER FOR X-RAYS. NO FRACTURE READILY EVIDENT. PATIENT RETURNED TO CLINIC FOR SOC AND STUDY VISIT. RADIOGRAPHS CLEARLY SHOWED ACROMIAL STRESS FRACTURE WITHOUT ANGULATION NOR DISPLACEMENT OF THE FRACTURE. THE ACROMIAL STRESS FRACTURE IS HEALING WELL.
Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s); Pain
MAUDE report 17305107 ↗InjuryJan 19, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THE PATIENT WAS SEEN ON FOR STANDARD OF CARE FOLLOW-UP VISIT. THE TREATING SURGEON DID NOT FEEL A STRONG CONTRACTION IN THE AXILLARY NERVE. PATIENT COULD NOT HOLD ARM IN ABDUCTION AGAINST GRAVITY. DELTOID CONTRACTION WAS MINIMAL. PATIENT WILL COMPLETE NORMAL PHYSICAL THERAPY PLAN.
Patient problems: Loss of Range of Motion; Muscle Weakness/Atrophy; Nerve Damage; Paralysis
MAUDE report 16210841 ↗
Other shoulder prosthesis, reverse configuration devices
- DJO SURGICAL 508-36-101Encore Medical, L.P. · shoulder prosthesis, reverse configuration508 reports
- DJO SURGICAL 508-32-101Encore Medical, L.P. · shoulder prosthesis, reverse configuration433 reports
- DJO SURGICAL 508-32-103Encore Medical, L.P. · shoulder prosthesis, reverse configuration421 reports
- DJO SURGICAL 509-00-036Encore Medical, L.P. · shoulder prosthesis, reverse configuration1 recall259 reports
- DJO SURGICAL 508-32-104Encore Medical, L.P. · shoulder prosthesis, reverse configuration1 recall203 reports
- DJO SURGICAL 509-00-032Encore Medical, L.P. · shoulder prosthesis, reverse configuration233 reports
- DELTA XTEND 130760000Depuy (Ireland) · shoulder prosthesis, reverse configuration223 reports
- DJO SURGICAL 508-00-032Encore Medical, L.P. · shoulder prosthesis, reverse configuration122 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page