Skip to content

Tornier Perform® Reversed Glenoid DWJ322Recalls & reported problems

Tornier, Inc. · Peripheral Screw · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Tornier Perform Reversed Glenoid (41)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
7
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
7
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 7 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00846832090051), received between Feb 26, 2024 and Oct 21, 2025 — classified as 7 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 1 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 1 reportsMay 2024: 1 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 2 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 1 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 1 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem6
  • Break1
  • Fracture1
  • Migration1

Patient problems

  • Unspecified Infection4
  • Bone Fracture(s)1
  • Failure of Implant1
  • Fall1
  • Post Operative Wound Infection1
  • Rash1

Recent adverse event reports

The 7 most recent of 7 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryOct 21, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A REVISION SURGERY WAS PERFORMED USING THE BLUEPRINT PLANNING FEATURE. THE PATIENT HAD PREVIOUSLY UNDERGONE A PRIMARY SHOULDER PROCEDURE INVOLVING STRYKER/TORNIER IMPLANTS. FOLLOWING THE INITIAL SURGERY, THE PATIENT DEVELOPED AN INFECTION, AND ALL IMPLANTS WERE EXPLANTED WITH PLACEMENT OF AN ANTIBIOTIC SPACER. THE REVISION PROCEDURE INVOLVED REMOVAL OF THE SPACER AND CONVERSION TO A REVERSE SHOULDER ARTHROPLASTY.

    Patient problems: Post Operative Wound Infection

    MAUDE report 23347194 ↗
  • InjuryJan 27, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT FELL RESULTING IN A PERIPROSTHETIC FRACTURE. ALL IMPLANTED COMPONENTS WERE REMOVED, AND A REVERSE PROSTHESIS WAS PLACED. NO IMAGES WERE PROVIDED. THE EXPLANTED IMPLANTS WERE NOT AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION PER HOSPITAL POLICY REQUIRING DISPOSAL OF EXPLANTED ITEMS.

    Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s); Fall

    MAUDE report 21242131 ↗
  • InjurySep 27, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A ONE STAGE REVISION DUE TO AN ACUTE INFECTION.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 20327396 ↗
  • InjurySep 27, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A ONE STAGE REVISION DUE TO AN ACUTE INFECTION.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 20327242 ↗
  • InjuryMay 16, 2024Break; Fracture; Migration; Break; Fracture; Migration

    THE PRIMARY REVERSE PROCEDURE EMPLOYED TORNIER IMPLANTS, INCLUDING THE SHOULDER ID BASEPLATE AND PERFORM HUMERAL. THE OBSERVED BASEPLATE FAILURE IS ATTRIBUTED TO LIKELY OVER-LATERALIZATION, STEMMING FROM THE THICKNESS OF THE SHOULDER ID BASEPLATE AND A LATERALIZED GLENOSPHERE. THERE WAS ALSO A SCREW BREAKAGE.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 19328765 ↗
  • InjuryApr 3, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    DURING A PHONE CALL, A CASE OF REVISION SURGERY FOR A JOINT INFECTION RELATED TO INSTRUMENT BREAKAGE WAS DISCUSSED. THE BROKEN INSTRUMENT, IDENTIFIED AS A SCREWDRIVER, FRACTURED DURING A REVERSE SHOULDER REVISION SURGERY. THE PROCEDURE INVOLVED SUCCESSFULLY IMPLANTING A DEPUY SPACER. THE INFECTION WAS DETECTED THROUGH A SUPERFICIAL RASH NEAR THE INCISION SITE. MICROORGANISMS WERE NOT IDENTIFIED, AND IT'S UNCERTAIN IF THE PATIENT HAD A PRE-EXISTING INFECTION. NO STERILE IMPLANTS WERE OPENED DURING THE SURGERY, AND NO RE-STERILIZATION OF THE DEVICE WAS PERFORMED BEFORE THE SURGERY.

    Patient problems: Rash; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 19038420 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 26, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    THE REVISION SURGERY WAS CONDUCTED IN RESPONSE TO AN INFECTION. AN UPDATE PROVIDED INDICATES A LACK OF INFORMATION REGARDING THE LOT NUMBERS FOR THE SCREWS USED. HOWEVER, IT WAS MENTIONED THAT THE INFECTION APPEARED TO BE LOCALIZED, AND THE PROCEDURE INVOLVED WASHING OUT AND EXCHANGING PARTS.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 18778202 ↗

Other PROSTHESIS, SHOULDER, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER CEMENTED devices

All PROSTHESIS, SHOULDER, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER CEMENTED devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page