Skip to content

Tornier Perform® Anatomic Augmented Glenoid DWK503RA15Recalls & reported problems

Tornier, Inc. · Keeled Glenoid Augment · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 00846832090587), received between May 12, 2026 and May 12, 2026 — classified as 1 injury.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Off-Label Use” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 1 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Off-Label Use1
  • Osseointegration Problem1

Patient problems

  • Discomfort1
  • Inadequate Osseointegration1
  • Muscle/Tendon Damage1
  • Radiolucent Lines1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryMay 12, 2026Off-Label Use; Osseointegration Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A RIGHT PRIMARY ANATOMIC SHOULDER REPLACEMENT ON (B)(6) 2024. ADVISED BY SURGEON YESTERDAY THAT THE PATIENT NOW REQUIRES A REVISION (REMOVAL OF ALL IMPLANTS), AND CONVERSION TO A REVERSE SHOULDER REPLACEMENT, AS THE PATIENT'S ROTATOR CUFF HAS FAILED. THE SURGERY WAS SCHEDULED FOR (B)(6) 2026. RIGHT PRIMARY SHOULDER ARTHROPLASTY ON (B)(6) 2024. PATIENT HAD BEEN COMPLAINING OF DISCOMFORT IN PROSTHETIC RIGHT SHOULDER JOINT APPROX 6 MONTHS POST-OP. X-RAY AT THIS TIME SHOWED SOME EVIDENCE OF LUCENCY AROUND GLENOID COMPONENT. CT SCAN AT 12 MONTHS POST-OP SHOWED INCREASING LUCENCY. HE COMPLAINED OF MORE DISCOMFORT. CT SCAN LATE 2025 SHOWED LOOSE GLENOID COMPONENT, REVISION SURGERY BOOKED. SIMPLICITI HEAD REMOVED, SIMPLICITI NUCLEUS WAS SOLID, BUT THE REVISION TOOLS GOT IT OUT QUITE CLEAN. MINIMAL BONE LOSS. GLENOID PERFORM PLUS POLY WAS VERY LOOSE, CAVITY BEHIND IT. COMPONENT HAD MINIMAL CEMENT STILL ADHERED TO IT. MULTIPLE TISSUE SAMPLES TAKEN, THOUGH SURGEON STATED THAT THERE WERE NO CLINICAL SIGNS OF INFECTION. COPIOUS LAVAGE. SHOULDER JOINT REDUCED, STABLE THROUGH FULL RANGE OF MOTION. EXPLANTED PROSTHESIS BEING RETURNED (IN A STERI-PEEL PKT

    Patient problems: Discomfort; Inadequate Osseointegration; Muscle/Tendon Damage; Radiolucent Lines

    MAUDE report 25152859 ↗

Other PROSTHESIS, SHOULDER, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER CEMENTED devices

All PROSTHESIS, SHOULDER, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER CEMENTED devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page