Skip to content

Tornier HRS ARS342008Recalls & reported problems

Tornier, Inc. · Spacer · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Tornier HRS (40)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 00846832092659), received between Jun 27, 2024 and Jun 27, 2024 — classified as 1 injury.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Loss of Osseointegration” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 1 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Loss of Osseointegration1

Patient problems

  • Inadequate Osseointegration1
  • Nonunion/Delayed-union Bone Fracture1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJun 27, 2024Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration

    AS REPORTED: "IT WAS REPORTED THAT A LOOSENING OF THE COMPONENTS WAS DETECTED, AND IT WAS WEARING A LOCKING CAP THAT IS SUPPOSED TO LOCK THE COMPONENTS. AFTER APPROXIMATELY 8 MONTHS OF INITIAL SURGERY, THE PATIENT NOTICED A ¿CLICK¿ AND THEY WENT TO THE EMERGENCY ROOM, WHERE THEY UNDERWENT AN X-RAY SHOWING THE DISASSEMBLY OF THE IMPLANT. HOWEVER, IT WAS NOT UNTIL (B)(6) 2024 THAT THEY WERE SEEN BY A TRAUMATOLOGIST WHO KNEW ABOUT THE IMPLANT AND WAS THE ONE WHO DETECTED THAT THE CONDITION OF THE STEM WAS NOT WHERE IT SHOULD BE. THE INITIAL SURGERY WAS ON (B)(6) 2023 AND A TORQUE SCREWDRIVER WAS USED TO ENSURE THAT THE TIGHTENING TORQUE WAS DONE WITH THE NECESSARY FORCE. THE INITIAL SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY WITHOUT ANYTHING TO REPORT."

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration; Nonunion/Delayed-union Bone Fracture

    MAUDE report 19629393 ↗

Other PROSTHESIS, SHOULDER, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER CEMENTED devices

All PROSTHESIS, SHOULDER, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER CEMENTED devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page