Tornier HRS ARS741703Recalls & reported problems
Tornier, Inc. · PTC Proximal Body · Class 2 · Implant
All models of Tornier HRS (40)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 8
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 8
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 8 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00846832092727), received between Aug 22, 2024 and Jun 8, 2026 — classified as 8 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Dislodged or Dislocated” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem3
- Device Dislodged or Dislocated2
- Migration2
- Detachment of Device or Device Component1
- Loss of Osseointegration1
- Off-Label Use1
- Osseointegration Problem1
Patient problems
- Unspecified Infection3
- Fall2
- Inadequate Osseointegration2
- Discomfort1
- Insufficient Information1
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
- Osteolysis1
- Pain1
Recent adverse event reports
The 8 most recent of 8 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryJun 8, 2026Detachment of Device or Device Component
THE MANUFACTURER RECEIVED A REPORT FROM THE NATIONAL JOINT REGISTRY THAT CONTAINS UNPUBLISHED COLLECTED DATA ON THE USAGE AND THE OUTCOMES OF THE SHOULDER JOINT REPLACEMENT. THE REPORT DETAILS ANALYSIS PROVIDED FOR REVISION PROCEDURES PERFORMED UNTIL (B)(6) 2026. DURING THE REVIEW OF THE REPORT, IT WAS IDENTIFIED THAT ON (B)(6) 2026 A PATIENT REQUIRED REVISION SURGERY DUE TO COMPONENT DISSOCIATION, WHICH WAS NOT PREVIOUSLY REPORTED TO THE MANUFACTURER.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 25426224 ↗InjuryDec 1, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
THE MANUFACTURER RECEIVED A REPORT FROM THE NATIONAL JOINT REGISTRY THAT CONTAINS UNPUBLISHED COLLECTED DATA ON THE USAGE AND THE OUTCOMES OF THE SHOULDER JOINT REPLACEMENT. THE REPORT DETAILS ANALYSIS PROVIDED FOR REVISION PROCEDURES PERFORMED IN 2025. DURING THE REVIEW OF THE REPORT, IT WAS IDENTIFIED THAT ON (B)(6) 2025 A PATIENT REQUIRED REVISION SURGERY DUE TO INFECTION, WHICH WAS NOT PREVIOUSLY REPORTED TO THE MANUFACTURER.
Patient problems: Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 23687139 ↗InjuryOct 15, 2025Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Osseointegration Problem; Migration; Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Osseointegration Problem; Migration
IT WAS REPORTED THAT EIGHT-MONTH POSTOPERATIVE IMAGING REVEALED GAPPING AT THE SURGICAL SITE. THE INITIAL ACCOUNT INDICATED THAT ONLY MODULAR COMPONENTS¿INCLUDING THE POLYETHYLENE INSERT, TRAY, LOCKING CAP, AND ASSEMBLY SCREW¿WERE EXCHANGED UNDER FLUOROSCOPIC GUIDANCE. HOWEVER, THIS WAS LATER CORRECTED TO REFLECT THAT THE ENTIRE HUMERAL CONSTRUCT WAS REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH A 230 MM CONSTRUCT.
Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration
MAUDE report 23300964 ↗InjuryMay 26, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
THE MANUFACTURER RECEIVED A REPORT FROM THE NATIONAL JOINT REGISTRY THAT CONTAINS UNPUBLISHED COLLECTED DATA ON THE USAGE AND THE OUTCOMES OF THE SHOULDER JOINT REPLACEMENT. THE REPORT DETAILS ANALYSIS PROVIDED FOR REVISION PROCEDURES PERFORMED UNTIL (B)(6) 2025. DURING THE REVIEW OF THE REPORT, IT WAS IDENTIFIED THAT ON (B)(6) 2025 A PATIENT REQUIRED REVISION SURGERY DUE TO INFECTION, WHICH WAS NOT PREVIOUSLY REPORTED TO THE MANUFACTURER.
Patient problems: Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 22083352 ↗InjuryApr 28, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
THE MANUFACTURER RECEIVED A REPORT FROM THE NATIONAL JOINT REGISTRY THAT CONTAINS UNPUBLISHED COLLECTED DATA ON THE USAGE AND THE OUTCOMES WITH THE TORNIER SHOULDER SYSTEM. THE REPORT DETAILS ANALYSIS PROVIDED FOR PROCEDURES PERFORMED BETWEEN (B)(6) 2013 ¿ (B)(6) 2024. DURING THE REVIEW OF THE REPORT, IT WAS IDENTIFIED THAT ON (B)(6) 2023, A PATIENT REQUIRED REVISION SURGERY DUE TO INFECTION, WHICH WAS NOT PREVIOUSLY REPORTED TO THE MANUFACTURER.
Patient problems: Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 21919388 ↗InjuryMar 10, 2025Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Migration; Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Migration
IT WAS REPORTED BY COUNSEL THAT CLAIMANT UNDERWENT REVISION OF HIS RIGHT SHOULDER ON (B)(6) 2024, WITH TORNIER AEQUALIS IMPLANTS AND WAS REVISED ON (B)(6) 2024, DUE TO ALLEGED CONTINUED PAIN, SENSE OF CATCHING AND SLIGHT EVIDENCE OF MOTION OF THE TUBEROSITY FRACTURES. PATIENT WAS 3 WEEKS POST OP FROM A REVERSE SHOULDER ARTHROPLASTY. PATIENT HAD 2 FALLS POST-OP, ONE IN THE HOSPITAL AND WHEN AT HOME. PATIENT COMPLAINED OF CONTINUED PAIN AND A SENSE OF CATCHING IN THE SHOULDER AND THERE WAS SLIGHT EVIDENCE OF MOTION OF THE TUBEROSITY FRACTURE. ADDITIONALLY WITH ONE OF THE FALLS THE PATIENTS WOUND RE-OPENED AND HE WAS HAVING SOME DRAINAGE. DURING THE REVISION IT WAS NOTED THAT THE LOCKING SCREW FROM THE BODY TO THE DISTAL PORTION OF THE STEM HAD LOOSENED AND THE DISTAL PART OF THE STEM WAS WELL FIXED, THE BODY WAS FREELY MOVING. THE LOCKING CAP OVER THE SCREW WAS COMPLETELY INTACT BUT THE SCREW DEEP TO IT HAD LOOSENED. ALL OF THE IMPLANTS WERE REMOVED AND REPLACED.
Patient problems: Discomfort; Fall; Pain; Wound Dehiscence
MAUDE report 21561313 ↗InjuryOct 8, 2024Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT COMPLAINED OF "GRINDING" WITH MOVEMENT DURING POST-OPERATIVE VISITS. A FALL RESULTED IN A FRACTURE OF THE GREATER TUBEROSITY, REQUIRING SURGICAL INTERVENTION. DURING FRACTURE FIXATION, IT WAS OBSERVED THAT THE PROXIMAL BODY HAD LOOSENED FROM THE STEM. FURTHER INSPECTION REVEALED THAT WHILE THE LOCKING CAP WAS FULLY SEATED, THE SCREW HAD LOOSENED FROM THE DISTAL STEM.
Patient problems: Fall; Inadequate Osseointegration; Osteolysis
MAUDE report 20400378 ↗InjuryAug 22, 2024Off-Label Use; Off-Label Use
SURGEON RECENTLY USED THE REVIVE STEM WITH A PYROCARBON HUMERAL HEAD FOR A PATIENT WHO NEEDED TO BE REVISED TO A HEMIARTHROPLASTY. THIS IS OFF-LABEL USAGE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 20023840 ↗
Other PROSTHESIS, SHOULDER, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER CEMENTED devices
- DJO SURGICAL 508-32-204Encore Medical, L.P. · PROSTHESIS, SHOULDER, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER CEMENTED1 recall544 reports
- Comprehensive Reverse Shoulder 010000589Biomet Orthopedics, LLC · PROSTHESIS, SHOULDER, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER CEMENTED1 recall142 reports
- DELTA XTEND 130738203Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, SHOULDER, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER CEMENTED175 reports
- DJO SURGICAL 509-00-432Encore Medical, L.P. · Prosthesis, Shoulder, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Polymer Cemented1 recall117 reports
- Alliance® SBGL3007Zimmer, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, SHOULDER, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER CEMENTED162 reports
- DELTA XTEND 130760138Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, SHOULDER, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER CEMENTED146 reports
- DELTA XTEND 130790030Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, SHOULDER, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER CEMENTED132 reports
- DJO SURGICAL 509-00-436Encore Medical, L.P. · Prosthesis, Shoulder, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Polymer Cemented124 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page