Skip to content

Tornier HRS ARS741703Recalls & reported problems

Tornier, Inc. · PTC Proximal Body · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Tornier HRS (40)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
8
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
8
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 8 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00846832092727), received between Aug 22, 2024 and Jun 8, 2026 — classified as 8 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Dislodged or Dislocated” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 1 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 1 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 1 reportsApr 2025: 1 reportsMay 2025: 1 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 1 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 1 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 1 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem3
  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated2
  • Migration2
  • Detachment of Device or Device Component1
  • Loss of Osseointegration1
  • Off-Label Use1
  • Osseointegration Problem1

Patient problems

  • Unspecified Infection3
  • Fall2
  • Inadequate Osseointegration2
  • Discomfort1
  • Insufficient Information1
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
  • Osteolysis1
  • Pain1

Recent adverse event reports

The 8 most recent of 8 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJun 8, 2026Detachment of Device or Device Component

    THE MANUFACTURER RECEIVED A REPORT FROM THE NATIONAL JOINT REGISTRY THAT CONTAINS UNPUBLISHED COLLECTED DATA ON THE USAGE AND THE OUTCOMES OF THE SHOULDER JOINT REPLACEMENT. THE REPORT DETAILS ANALYSIS PROVIDED FOR REVISION PROCEDURES PERFORMED UNTIL (B)(6) 2026. DURING THE REVIEW OF THE REPORT, IT WAS IDENTIFIED THAT ON (B)(6) 2026 A PATIENT REQUIRED REVISION SURGERY DUE TO COMPONENT DISSOCIATION, WHICH WAS NOT PREVIOUSLY REPORTED TO THE MANUFACTURER.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 25426224 ↗
  • InjuryDec 1, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    THE MANUFACTURER RECEIVED A REPORT FROM THE NATIONAL JOINT REGISTRY THAT CONTAINS UNPUBLISHED COLLECTED DATA ON THE USAGE AND THE OUTCOMES OF THE SHOULDER JOINT REPLACEMENT. THE REPORT DETAILS ANALYSIS PROVIDED FOR REVISION PROCEDURES PERFORMED IN 2025. DURING THE REVIEW OF THE REPORT, IT WAS IDENTIFIED THAT ON (B)(6) 2025 A PATIENT REQUIRED REVISION SURGERY DUE TO INFECTION, WHICH WAS NOT PREVIOUSLY REPORTED TO THE MANUFACTURER.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 23687139 ↗
  • InjuryOct 15, 2025Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Osseointegration Problem; Migration; Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Osseointegration Problem; Migration

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT EIGHT-MONTH POSTOPERATIVE IMAGING REVEALED GAPPING AT THE SURGICAL SITE. THE INITIAL ACCOUNT INDICATED THAT ONLY MODULAR COMPONENTS¿INCLUDING THE POLYETHYLENE INSERT, TRAY, LOCKING CAP, AND ASSEMBLY SCREW¿WERE EXCHANGED UNDER FLUOROSCOPIC GUIDANCE. HOWEVER, THIS WAS LATER CORRECTED TO REFLECT THAT THE ENTIRE HUMERAL CONSTRUCT WAS REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH A 230 MM CONSTRUCT.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration

    MAUDE report 23300964 ↗
  • InjuryMay 26, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    THE MANUFACTURER RECEIVED A REPORT FROM THE NATIONAL JOINT REGISTRY THAT CONTAINS UNPUBLISHED COLLECTED DATA ON THE USAGE AND THE OUTCOMES OF THE SHOULDER JOINT REPLACEMENT. THE REPORT DETAILS ANALYSIS PROVIDED FOR REVISION PROCEDURES PERFORMED UNTIL (B)(6) 2025. DURING THE REVIEW OF THE REPORT, IT WAS IDENTIFIED THAT ON (B)(6) 2025 A PATIENT REQUIRED REVISION SURGERY DUE TO INFECTION, WHICH WAS NOT PREVIOUSLY REPORTED TO THE MANUFACTURER.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 22083352 ↗
  • InjuryApr 28, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    THE MANUFACTURER RECEIVED A REPORT FROM THE NATIONAL JOINT REGISTRY THAT CONTAINS UNPUBLISHED COLLECTED DATA ON THE USAGE AND THE OUTCOMES WITH THE TORNIER SHOULDER SYSTEM. THE REPORT DETAILS ANALYSIS PROVIDED FOR PROCEDURES PERFORMED BETWEEN (B)(6) 2013 ¿ (B)(6) 2024. DURING THE REVIEW OF THE REPORT, IT WAS IDENTIFIED THAT ON (B)(6) 2023, A PATIENT REQUIRED REVISION SURGERY DUE TO INFECTION, WHICH WAS NOT PREVIOUSLY REPORTED TO THE MANUFACTURER.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 21919388 ↗
  • InjuryMar 10, 2025Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Migration; Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Migration

    IT WAS REPORTED BY COUNSEL THAT CLAIMANT UNDERWENT REVISION OF HIS RIGHT SHOULDER ON (B)(6) 2024, WITH TORNIER AEQUALIS IMPLANTS AND WAS REVISED ON (B)(6) 2024, DUE TO ALLEGED CONTINUED PAIN, SENSE OF CATCHING AND SLIGHT EVIDENCE OF MOTION OF THE TUBEROSITY FRACTURES. PATIENT WAS 3 WEEKS POST OP FROM A REVERSE SHOULDER ARTHROPLASTY. PATIENT HAD 2 FALLS POST-OP, ONE IN THE HOSPITAL AND WHEN AT HOME. PATIENT COMPLAINED OF CONTINUED PAIN AND A SENSE OF CATCHING IN THE SHOULDER AND THERE WAS SLIGHT EVIDENCE OF MOTION OF THE TUBEROSITY FRACTURE. ADDITIONALLY WITH ONE OF THE FALLS THE PATIENTS WOUND RE-OPENED AND HE WAS HAVING SOME DRAINAGE. DURING THE REVISION IT WAS NOTED THAT THE LOCKING SCREW FROM THE BODY TO THE DISTAL PORTION OF THE STEM HAD LOOSENED AND THE DISTAL PART OF THE STEM WAS WELL FIXED, THE BODY WAS FREELY MOVING. THE LOCKING CAP OVER THE SCREW WAS COMPLETELY INTACT BUT THE SCREW DEEP TO IT HAD LOOSENED. ALL OF THE IMPLANTS WERE REMOVED AND REPLACED.

    Patient problems: Discomfort; Fall; Pain; Wound Dehiscence

    MAUDE report 21561313 ↗
  • InjuryOct 8, 2024Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT COMPLAINED OF "GRINDING" WITH MOVEMENT DURING POST-OPERATIVE VISITS. A FALL RESULTED IN A FRACTURE OF THE GREATER TUBEROSITY, REQUIRING SURGICAL INTERVENTION. DURING FRACTURE FIXATION, IT WAS OBSERVED THAT THE PROXIMAL BODY HAD LOOSENED FROM THE STEM. FURTHER INSPECTION REVEALED THAT WHILE THE LOCKING CAP WAS FULLY SEATED, THE SCREW HAD LOOSENED FROM THE DISTAL STEM.

    Patient problems: Fall; Inadequate Osseointegration; Osteolysis

    MAUDE report 20400378 ↗
  • InjuryAug 22, 2024Off-Label Use; Off-Label Use

    SURGEON RECENTLY USED THE REVIVE STEM WITH A PYROCARBON HUMERAL HEAD FOR A PATIENT WHO NEEDED TO BE REVISED TO A HEMIARTHROPLASTY. THIS IS OFF-LABEL USAGE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20023840 ↗

Other PROSTHESIS, SHOULDER, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER CEMENTED devices

All PROSTHESIS, SHOULDER, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER CEMENTED devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page