Skip to content

AxiumTM APB-4-8-HX-SSRecalls & reported problems

Micro Therapeutics, Inc. · APB-4-8-HX-SS PRIME BARE AXIUM 4MMX8CM · Class 2 · Implant

All models of AxiumTM (139)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00847536008175), received between Feb 21, 2021 and Jul 22, 2024 — classified as 1 injury, 3 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (1 report).

2 other recalls cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K081465); they may or may not involve this specific model.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 1 reportsJul 2024: 1 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break1
  • Detachment of Device or Device Component1
  • Material Deformation1
  • Migration1
  • Physical Resistance/Sticking1
  • Stretched1
  • Therapy Delivered to Incorrect Body Area1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3
  • Failure of Implant1

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJul 22, 2024Therapy Delivered to Incorrect Body Area; Migration; Therapy Delivered to Incorrect Body Area; Migration

    ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED REPORTED NO ANOMALOUS SHAPE WAS DETERMINED. THERE WAS NO ISSUES THAT RESULTED IN THE COIL DAMAGE. NO MEDICAL OR SURGICAL INTERVENTION IS PLANNED. THE ANTIPLATELET REGIMEN WAS ADMNISTERED AFTER THE PROCEDURE. NO PATIENT SYMPTOSM OR C OMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 19791358 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 26, 2024Stretched; Stretched

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED REPORT REGARDING THREE DIFFERENT AXIUM COILS THAT WERE STRETCHED DURING THE PROCEDURE. EACH TIME THE STRETCHED COIL WAS REPLACED AND THE REPLACEMENT COIL WAS IMPLANTED SUCCESSFULLY. IT WAS NOTED THAT ALL INVOLVED DEVICES WERE PREPARED AS INDICATED IN THE INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE (IFU). PATIENT VESSEL TORTUOSITY WAS REPORTED TO BE NORMAL. THERE WAS NO HARM OR INJURY TO THE PATIENT. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED THAT THERE WERE NO ISSUES THAT RESULTED IN THE DAMAGE THAT WAS FOUND. THERE WAS NO FRICTION OR OTHER DIFFICULTY DURING DELIVERY OR POSITIONING. THE CONTINUOUS CATHETER FLUSH WAS ADMINISTERED DURING THE PROCEDURE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19617736 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 30, 2022Break; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Physical Resistance/Sticking; Break; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Physical Resistance/Sticking

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED A REPORT THAT WHEN THE HELIX COIL WAS INSERTED INTO SL10 CATHETER, THE COIL WAS REMOVED DUE TO DISCOMFORT. WHEN THE COIL WAS REMOVED, IT WAS FOUND THAT THE COIL HAD DETACHED. THE COIL WAS SLIGHTLY PROTRUDING FROM THE SL10 HUB. THERE WAS COIL BREAKAGE/EARLY DETACHMENT. THE COIL WAS REMOVED FROM THE BODY AND HUB USING A PUNCTURE NEEDLE. THERE WAS NO SURGICAL OR MEDICINAL INTERVENTION REQUIRED. IT WAS UNKNOWN IF THERE WAS ANY DEFORMATION OR BREAKAGE IN THE DELIVERY PUSHER. THERE WAS RESISTANCE DURING DELIVERY. THE COIL WAS NOT REPOSITIONED. THE PHYSICIAN DID NOT ATTEMPT TO DETACH THE COIL. THE DELIVERY PUSHER DID NOT ROTATE INSIDE THE PATIENT. CONTINUOUS FLUSH WAS ADMINISTERED DURING THE PROCEDURE. THE PREPARATION OF THE DEVICE FOLLOWED THE INSTRUCTIONS IN THE PACKAGE INSERT. NO HEALTH DAMAGE WAS PRESENT. THE PATIENT WAS UNDERGOING SURGERY FOR TREATMENT OF A SPINDLE SHAPED, UNRUPTURED RIGHT M1 DOWNWARD ANEURYSM WITH A MAX DIAMETER OF 9MM AND A 3.5MM NECK DIAMETER.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 15885887 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 21, 2021Material Deformation; Material Deformation

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED A REPORT THAT THE AXIUM COIL WAS ABNORMAL WHEN PUSHED IN THE MIDDLE OF THE MICROCATHETER AND EXPERIENCED RESISTANCE. THE COIL WAS WITHDRAWN AND REPLACED WITH ANOTHER COIL OF THE SAME MODEL. ANOTHER COIL (APB-4-8-HX-ES) USED IN THE PROCEDURE HAD THE DISTAL PUSHWIRE STRETCHED AT THE TIP OF THE MICROCATHETER RESULTING IN THE COIL BEING WITHDRAWN. THERE WAS NO FRICTION OR REPOSITIONING, AND A CONTINUOUS FLUSH WAS NOT USED. A REPLACEMENT COIL WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. IT WAS INDICATED THAT ALL DEVICES WERE PREPARED AS PER THE INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE (IFU), AND NO PATIENT SYMPTOMS OR FURTHER COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT. THE PATIENT WAS UNDERGOING SURGERY FOR TREATMENT OF A SACCULAR, RUPTURED ANEURYSM WITH A MAX DIAMETER OF 9 MM AND A 6 MM NECK DIAMETER. IT WAS NOTED THE PATIENT'S BLOOD FLOW WAS NORMAL AND VESSEL TORTUOSITY WAS MINIMAL. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED CONFIRMED THAT THE COIL PUSHED SMOOTHLY FROM THE SHEATH.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 11356830 ↗

Recalls under the same FDA submission

These recalls involve devices cleared under K081465. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.

  • Z-0874-2012 · Mar 1, 2010 · Terminated
    Axium Detachable Coil System QC-7-30-Helix The ev3 Axium Detachable Coil System is indicated for the endovascular embolization of intracranial aneurysms and other neurovascular a
  • Z-0873-2012 · Mar 1, 2010 · Terminated
    Axium Detachable Coil System QC-2-1-Helix The ev3 Axium Detachable Coil System is indicated for the endovascular embolization of intracranial aneurysms and other neurovascular ab

Other Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization devices

All Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page