AxiumTM APB-6-20-HX-SSRecalls & reported problems
Micro Therapeutics, Inc. · APB-6-20-HX-SS PRIME BARE AXIUM · Class 2 · Implant
All models of AxiumTM (139)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 4
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00847536013032), received between Dec 12, 2018 and Jun 19, 2024 — classified as 4 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (2 reports).
2 other recalls cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K081465); they may or may not involve this specific model.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Break2
- Physical Resistance/Sticking2
- Material Deformation1
- Separation Failure1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient2
Recent adverse event reports
The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionJun 19, 2024Material Deformation; Physical Resistance/Sticking; Material Deformation; Physical Resistance/Sticking
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED A REPORT THAT THE AXIUM COIL ENCOUNTERED RESISTANCE IN THE ECHELON CATHETER AND WAS FOUND KINKED/DAMAGED. THE PATIENT WAS UNDERGOING SURGERY FOR TREATMENT OF AN AMORPHOUS ANEURYSM IN THE INTERNAL CAROTID ARTERY (ICA) WITH A MAX DIAMETER OF 7.83 MM AND A 4.31 MM NECK DIAMETER. IT WAS NOTED THE PATIENT'S VESSEL TORTUOSITY WAS NORMAL. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE FIRST COILS WERE SUCCESSFUL IMPLANTED AXIUM 3D 6-20. THEN THE PHYSICIAN INSERTED THE SECOND COILS AXIUM HELIX 6-20, BUT IT WAS STUCK 5CM FROM THE PROXIMAL MICROCATHETER. IT WAS REPORTED THE COIL ENCOUNTERED RESISTANCE/STUCK IN PROXIMAL SECTION OF THE MICROCATHETER. THERE WAS NO CATHETER DAMAGE OBSERVED. THE COIL WAS OBSERVED TO BE KINKED/DAMAGED. THERE WAS FRICTION OR DIFFICULTY DURING TESTING OR DELIVERY. THE CONTINUOUS FLUSH WAS ADMINISTERED DURING THE PROCEDURE. THE DAMAGED/STRETCHED LOCATION WAS ON THE IMPLANT COIL. THE REPORTED DEVICE AND ANY ACCESSORY DEVICES WERE PREPARED AS INDICATED IN THE INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE (IFU). NO PATIENT SYMPTOMS OR FURTHER COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED THAT THE CAUSE OF THE RESISTANCE WAS NOT DETERMINED. THE PHYSICIAN
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19571296 ↗MalfunctionJun 7, 2022Break; Break
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT 2 AXIUM COILS WERE BROKEN. THE COIL WAS BROKEN; THE SIZE WAS CHANGED ON THE NEXT ONE, BUT IT WAS ALSO BROKEN. AFTER THAT, IT WAS REPLACED WITH A COIL FROM OTHER COMPANY AND WAS ABLE TO FINISH WITHOUT ANY TROUBLE. ON A SIDE NOTE, THE COIL OF THE OTHER COMPANY COULD BE PLACED PROPERLY WITHOUT GETTING BROKEN. THE COIL EXTENSION WAS BROKEN. THERE WAS NO RESISTANCE DURING PREPARATION OR USE. CONTINUOUS FLUSH WAS ADMINISTERED DURING THE PROCEDURE. THE COILS WERE NOT REPOSITIONED. THE DEVICES WERE PREPARED AS INDICATED IN THE PACKAGE INSERT. THE PATIENT WAS BEING TREATED FOR A RUPTURED, SACCULAR ANEURYSM. NO SYMPTOMS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 14627866 ↗MalfunctionJul 8, 2019Break; Break
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED REPORT THAT THE AXIUM COIL PARTIALLY DETACHED / BROKE WITHIN THE CATHETER. AT THE LATEST COIL WAS COIL NUMBER 42. WHEN MANIPULATION IN THE FISTULA A SHORT PART OF THE COIL BROKE. A PART THAT DETACHED STAYED IN THE PATIENT WITHOUT ANY PROBLEMS, BETWEEN THE OTHER 41 COILS. THE OTHER PART WAS STAYED WITHIN THE CATHETER AND IT WAS SAFELY REMOVED. THIS EVENT WAS REPORTED TO HAVE OCCURRED DURING THE TREATMENT OF VERTEBRAL FISTULA. THE DEVICES WERE PREPARED AND USED PER THE INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE. THE PUSHWIRE WAS NOT NOTED TO HAVE BEEN DAMAGED. THERE WAS NO FRICTION OR DIFFICULTY WHEN DELIVERING THE COIL. THE COIL WAS NOT REPOSITIONED AND WAS NOT ATTEMPTED TO BE DETACHED. THE PUSHWIRE WAS NOT ROTATED. A CONTINUOUS FLUSH WAS USED. THE BLOOD FLOW WAS NORMAL. THE ANATOMY WAS SEVERE IN TORTUOSITY.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 8768163 ↗MalfunctionDec 12, 2018Separation Failure; Physical Resistance/Sticking; Separation Failure; Physical Resistance/Sticking
THERE WAS NO DAMAGE TO THE PROXIMAL END OF THE PUSHWIRE DURING USE OR AFTER IT WAS REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT. THE PHYSICIAN ATTEMPTED TO DETACH THE COIL WITH THE INSTANT DETACHER 3 TIMES. A SECONDARY METHOD WAS ALSO ATTEMPTED TO DETACH THE COIL, WITH NO FORCE REQUIRED TO PULL THE RELEASE WIRE NOTED. THE PHYSICIAN ATTEMPTED TO BREAK THE PUSHWIRE 2 TIMES.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 8157195 ↗
Recalls under the same FDA submission
These recalls involve devices cleared under K081465. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.
- Z-0873-2012 · Mar 1, 2010 · TerminatedAxium Detachable Coil System QC-2-1-Helix The ev3 Axium Detachable Coil System is indicated for the endovascular embolization of intracranial aneurysms and other neurovascular ab
- Z-0874-2012 · Mar 1, 2010 · TerminatedAxium Detachable Coil System QC-7-30-Helix The ev3 Axium Detachable Coil System is indicated for the endovascular embolization of intracranial aneurysms and other neurovascular a
Other Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization devices
- POD RBYPOD8-APenumbra, Inc. · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization195 reports
- CEREPAKTM MDH1Cerenovus, Inc. · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization1 recall72 reports
- Azur CX Detachable 45-750824Microvention, Inc. · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization115 reports
- Tornado G08261Cook Incorporated · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization2 recalls7 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0930CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls4 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0720CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls4 reports
- Prestige Coil System PRES0520HPKPLBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls3 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0413CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls3 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page