ConcertoTM NV-5-15-HELIX (UDI 00847536013490)Recalls & reported problems
Micro Therapeutics, Inc. · NV-5-15-HELIX CONCERTO HELIX 5MMX15CM · Class 2 · Implant
All models of ConcertoTM (70)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 5
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00847536013490), received between Jan 28, 2019 and Jan 6, 2020 — classified as 5 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Separation Failure” (3 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Separation Failure3
- Physical Resistance/Sticking2
- Break1
- Detachment of Device or Device Component1
- Difficult or Delayed Positioning1
Patient problems
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient5
Recent adverse event reports
The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionJan 6, 2020Detachment of Device or Device Component; Physical Resistance/Sticking; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Physical Resistance/Sticking
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT THE PHYSICIAN WAS NOT ABLE TO ADVANCE THE COIL INTO THE MICROCATHETER AND WHEN PULLED BACK INTO THE DELIVERY CATHETER THE COIL WAS DETACHED AT THE CATHETER HUB. USED ANOTHER COIL SAME SIZE AND WERE ABLE TO DEPLOY. THE EVENT HAPPENED OUTSIDE THE PATIENT. THE PATIENT'S UNDERWENT EMBOLIZATION TREATMENT FOR PATENT WITH GLENN AND AP COLLATERALS.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 9554445 ↗MalfunctionNov 20, 2019Separation Failure; Separation Failure
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT THE COIL FAILURE TO DETACH. IT WAS ALSO NOTED THAT THE COIL WAS NOT HYDRATED AS INDICATED IN THE INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE (IFU). THERE WAS NO DETAILS ON THE ANEURYSM GIVEN AND NO PATIENT INJURY WAS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE EVENT. THE STAFF IS BEING RE-TRAINED MAKE SURE THEY FOLLOW THE STEPS PER THE INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE (IFU). NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 9349182 ↗MalfunctionOct 17, 2019Difficult or Delayed Positioning; Separation Failure; Physical Resistance/Sticking; Difficult or Delayed Positioning; Separation Failure; Physical Resistance/Sticking
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED A REPORT THAT THE CONCERTO HELIX COIL HAD RESISTANCE WHEN ADVANCING THROUGH THE STC18 MICROCATHETER, AND WOULD NOT DEPLOY ONCE POSITIONED. THE COIL WAS STUCK IN THE CATHETER, BUT THE LOCATION IN THE CATHETER WAS UNKNOWN. IT WAS UNKNOWN IF THERE WAS ANY CATHETER OR COIL DAMAGE, BUT NON-DETACHMENT WAS INDICATED. IT WAS UNKNOWN HOW MANY TIMES THE COIL DETACHMENT WAS ATTEMPTED OR IF A MANUAL ATTEMPT WAS PERFORMED. IT WAS UNKNOWN IF THE DEVICES WERE PREPARED ACCORDING TO THE INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE (IFU). NO PATIENT SYMPTOMS OR COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED WITH THIS EVENT. ANCILLARY DEVICES INCLUDE AN STC18 MICROCATHETER.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 9202942 ↗MalfunctionMar 25, 2019Break; Break
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED REPORT THAT THE CONCERTO COIL WAS PREPARED PER THE INSTRUCTIONS FOR USED BUT WAS UNABLE TO BE USED AS IT WAS STRETCHED OUT. NO PATIENT INJURY OCCURRED. THE CUSTOMER WAS NOTIFIED TO RETURN THE DEVICE. THE DEVICE WAS REPORTED TO HAVE BEEN PREPARED AND USED PER THE INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE (LEGAL/CONFIDENTIAL REASON).
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 8447995 ↗MalfunctionJan 28, 2019Separation Failure; Separation Failure
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED REPORT THAT THE CONCERTO COIL FAILED TO DETACH WITH THE INSTANT DETACHER AND VIA MANUAL METHOD. THE COIL WAS REMOVED. NO PATIENT INJURY OCCURRED. IT IS UNKNOWN HOW MANY ATTEMPTS WERE MADE WITH THE INSTANT DETACHER OR VIA MANUAL DETACHMENT. ALL OTHER EVENT DETAILS ARE UNKNOWN.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 8282567 ↗
Other Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization devices
- POD RBYPOD8-APenumbra, Inc. · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization195 reports
- CEREPAKTM MDH1Cerenovus, Inc. · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization1 recall72 reports
- Azur CX Detachable 45-750824Microvention, Inc. · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization115 reports
- Tornado G08261Cook Incorporated · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization2 recalls7 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0930CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls4 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0720CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls4 reports
- Prestige Coil System PRES0520HPKPLBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls3 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0413CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls3 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page