ConcertoTM PV-12-30-HELIX (UDI 00847536016941)Recalls & reported problems
Micro Therapeutics, Inc. · PV-12-30-HELIX CONCERTO PGLA COIL · Class 2 · Implant
All models of ConcertoTM (70)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 5
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00847536016941), received between Mar 20, 2017 and Oct 7, 2019 — classified as 5 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Separation Failure” (3 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Separation Failure3
- Break2
Patient problems
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient5
Recent adverse event reports
The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionOct 7, 2019Break; Break
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT THIS COIL BROKE DURING THE PROCEDURE. THE IMPLANT COIL REMAINS IN THE PATIENT. DEVICE OR DEVICE FRAGMENTS REMAIN IN PATIENT. RESISTANCE FELT WHEN THE DEVICE BROKE. THE PATIENT WAS UNDERGOING COILING TREATMENT. THERE WERE NO PATIENT SYMPTOMS OR COMPLICATIONS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS EVENT. THERE WERE NO ABNORMALITIES REPORTED IN RELATION TO ANATOMY. NO PATIENT INJURY WAS REPORTED. THE DEVICES WERE PREPARED AND USED PER THE INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 9162215 ↗MalfunctionMay 30, 2019Separation Failure; Separation Failure
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED REPORT THAT DURING A COILING EMBOLIZATION OF SPLENIC ANEURYSM, THREE CONCERTO COILS FAILED TO BE DETACHED WITH INSTANT DETACHERS. THERE WAS NO ALLEGATION OF A PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 8655695 ↗MalfunctionMar 25, 2019Break; Break
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED REPORT THAT THE CONCERTO COIL WAS PREPARED PER THE INSTRUCTIONS FOR USED BUT WAS UNABLE TO BE USED AS IT WAS STRETCHED OUT. THE DEVICE IS EXPECTED TO BE RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS. NO PATIENT INJURY OCCURRED. THE CUSTOMER WAS NOTIFIED TO RETURN THE DEVICE. THE DEVICE WAS REPORTED TO HAVE BEEN PREPARED AND USED PER THE INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE (LEGAL/CONFIDENTIAL REASON).
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 8448065 ↗MalfunctionFeb 15, 2019Separation Failure; Separation Failure
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED REPORT THAT A CONCERTO COIL WAS UNABLE TO DETACHED DURING A PROCEDURE. THE COIL WAS ABLE TO BE DELIVERED THROUGH THE CATHETER; THE CATHETER WAS FLUSHED. THE COIL WAS REPORTED TO HAVE BEEN ATTEMPTED TO BE DETACHED VIA MANUAL DETACHMENT ONLY ONCE. THERE WAS NO INSTANT DETACHER USED. UPON REMOVAL OF THE CATHETER, IT WAS REALIZED THAT THE COIL DID NOT DETACH. THESE DEVICES WERE REMOVED, ASSESSED AND PHOTOGRAPHED. THE DEVICES WERE THEN DISCARDED AT THE SITE. COMPETITOR DEVICES WERE USED TO TREAT THE PATIENT. THE PATIENT'S ANATOMY AND THE BLOOD FLOW WERE BOTH NORMAL. THE ACCESS VESSEL WAS THE HIPOGASTRICA (VESSEL DIAMETER WAS 10MM). THE DEVICES WERE REPORTED TO HAVE BEEN PREPARED AND USED PER THE INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE (IFU). THE CATHETER WAS FLUSHED AS STATED IN THE IFU.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 8344665 ↗MalfunctionMar 20, 2017Separation Failure; Separation Failure
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT DURING COILING TREATMENT OF DISTAL GONADAL VEIN, THIS COIL WOULD NOT DETACH WITH MANUAL DETACHMENT METHOD (BREAKING HYPOTUBE METHOD; AN ALTERNATIVE METHOD PRESENTED IN THE INSTRUCTION FOR USE). THE PHYSICIAN TRIED 3-4 TIMES WITH MANUAL METHOD BUT STILL COIL DID NOT DETACH. IT WAS REPORTED THAT PHYSICIAN DID NOT USE INSTANT DETACHER TO DETACH THE COIL. ANOTHER COIL WAS USED AND PROCEDURE COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. NO PATIENT INJURY WAS REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 6417666 ↗
Other Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization devices
- POD RBYPOD8-APenumbra, Inc. · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization195 reports
- CEREPAKTM MDH1Cerenovus, Inc. · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization1 recall72 reports
- Azur CX Detachable 45-750824Microvention, Inc. · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization115 reports
- Tornado G08261Cook Incorporated · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization2 recalls7 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0930CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls4 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0720CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls4 reports
- Prestige Coil System PRES0520HPKPLBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls3 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0413CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls3 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page