AxiumTM QC-5-15-3DRecalls & reported problems
Micro Therapeutics, Inc. · COIL QC-5-15-3D V04 AXIUM · Class 2 · Implant
All models of AxiumTM (139)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 3
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00847536030008), received between Mar 1, 2021 and May 13, 2022 — classified as 3 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Detachment of Device or Device Component” (2 reports).
2 other recalls cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K081465); they may or may not involve this specific model.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Detachment of Device or Device Component2
- Material Deformation1
- Physical Resistance/Sticking1
- Stretched1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3
Recent adverse event reports
The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionMay 13, 2022Physical Resistance/Sticking; Physical Resistance/Sticking
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION REGARDING AN AXIUM COIL THAT HAD RESISTANCE. THE PATIENT WAS UNDERGOING A COIL EMBOLIZATION PROCEDURE TO TREAT AN UNRUPTURED SACCULAR ANEURYSM IN THE RIGHT CAVERNOUS SINUS SEGMENT. THE ANEURYSM MAX DIAMETER WAS 8MM AND THE NECK DIAMETER WAS 5MM. BLOOD FLOW AND VESSEL TORTUOSITY WERE NORMAL. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE AXIUM COIL AND ALL ACCESSORY DEVICES WERE PREPARED AS INDICATED IN THE INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE (IFU). THE COIL PUSHED OUT OF THE INTRODUCER SHEATH SMOOTHLY BUT HAD RESISTANCE AND COULD NOT BE ADVANCED THROUGH THE PROXIMAL END OF THE CATHETER. THE COIL WAS REMOVED AND REPLACED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. IT WAS NOTED THERE WAS NO DAMAGE TO THE COIL OR THE CATHETER. THERE WAS NO HARM OR INJURY TO THE PATIENT. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED REPORTED THE CATHETER USED IN THE EVENT WAS AN ECHELON 10 MICROCATHETER.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 14402476 ↗MalfunctionOct 18, 2021Detachment of Device or Device Component; Material Deformation; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Material Deformation
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED CLARIFIED THAT THE COIL PREMATURELY DETACHED IN VITRO.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 12648478 ↗MalfunctionMar 1, 2021Stretched; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Stretched; Detachment of Device or Device Component
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION REGARDING AN AXIUM COIL THAT BROKE OR DETACHED PREMATURELY AND STRETCHED. THE PATIENT WAS UNDERGOING A COIL EMBOLIZATION PROCEDURE TO TREAT AN UNRUPTURED SACCULAR ANEURYSM OF THE LEFT POSTERIOR COMMUNICATING ARTERY. THE ANEURYSM MAX DIAMETER WAS 6MM AND THE NECK DIAMETER WAS 4MM. BLOOD FLOW AND VESSEL TORTUOSITY WERE NORMAL. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE AXIUM COIL AND ALL ACCESSORY DEVICES USED WERE PREPARED ACCORDING TO THE INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE (IFU). DURING ANEURYSM FILLING IT WAS DISCOVERED THAT THE COIL COULD NO LONGER BE MANIPULATED AS THE COIL HAD BROKEN OR DETACHED PREMATURELY AND WAS STRETCHED. THERE WAS NO FRICTION OR OTHER ISSUE WITH DELIVERY PRIOR TO THE DETACHMENT. THE PHYSICIAN DID NOT REPOSITION THE COIL OR ROTATE THE PUSHER. NO ATTEMPT HAD BEEN MADE AT DETACHMENT. CONTINUOUS CATHETER FLUSH WAS ADMINISTERED. THE NEXT COIL WAS ABLE TO PUSH THE STRETCHED PORTION OF THE FIRST COIL INTO THE ANEURYSM SAC AND THE PROCEDURE WAS SUCCESSFUL. THERE WAS NO HARM OR INJURY TO THE PATIENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 11392359 ↗
Recalls under the same FDA submission
These recalls involve devices cleared under K081465. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.
- Z-0874-2012 · Mar 1, 2010 · TerminatedAxium Detachable Coil System QC-7-30-Helix The ev3 Axium Detachable Coil System is indicated for the endovascular embolization of intracranial aneurysms and other neurovascular a
- Z-0873-2012 · Mar 1, 2010 · TerminatedAxium Detachable Coil System QC-2-1-Helix The ev3 Axium Detachable Coil System is indicated for the endovascular embolization of intracranial aneurysms and other neurovascular ab
Other Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization devices
- POD RBYPOD8-APenumbra, Inc. · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization195 reports
- CEREPAKTM MDH1Cerenovus, Inc. · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization1 recall72 reports
- Azur CX Detachable 45-750824Microvention, Inc. · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization115 reports
- Tornado G08261Cook Incorporated · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization2 recalls7 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0930CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls4 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0720CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls4 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0413CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls3 reports
- Prestige Coil System PRES0520HPKPLBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls3 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page