Skip to content

AxiumTM QC-7-30-3DRecalls & reported problems

Micro Therapeutics, Inc. · COIL QC-7-30-3D V04 AXIUM · Class 2 · Implant

All models of AxiumTM (139)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00847536030060), received between Feb 3, 2022 and Jan 18, 2024 — classified as 4 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Detachment of Device or Device Component” (3 reports).

2 other recalls cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K081465); they may or may not involve this specific model.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 1 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Detachment of Device or Device Component3
  • Physical Resistance/Sticking1
  • Separation Failure1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions4

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionJan 18, 2024Detachment of Device or Device Component; Physical Resistance/Sticking; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Physical Resistance/Sticking

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED A REPORT THAT THIS PATIENT HAD AN INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSM. DURING THE SURGICAL FILLING OF THE SPRING COIL, IT WAS FOUND THAT THE QC2-6-3D COULD NOT BE PUSHED. AFTER REPLACEMENT, THE PUSH WENT SMOOTHLY. THE COIL WAS STUCK IN THE MIDDLE OF THE CATHETER. THERE WAS NO DAMAGE OBSERVED ON THE CATHETER OR COIL. DURING THE SURGERY, IT WAS DISCOVERED THAT THE QC-7-30-3D SPRING COIL HAD DETACHED AUTOMATICALLY. THERE WAS NO SURGICAL OR MEDICINAL INTERVENTION REQUIRED. THE PUSHWIRE WAS NOT BENT OR BROKEN. THERE WAS FRICTION OF DIFFICULTY DURING DELIVERY. THE PHYSICIAN REPOSITIONED THE COIL TWICE. THE PHYSICIAN DID NOT ATTEMPT TO DETACH THE COIL. THE PHYSICIAN DID NOT ROTATE THE DELIVERY PUSHER DURING THE PROCEDURE. CONTINUOUS FLUSH WAS ADMINISTERED DURING THE PROCEDURE. NO PATIENT SYMPTOMS OR FURTHER COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT. THE DEVICE AND ANY ACCESSORIES WERE PREPARED AS INDICATED IN THE IFU. THE PATIENT WAS UNDERGOING SURGERY FOR TREATMENT OF A SACCULAR, RUPTURED RIGHT ANTERIOR COMMUNICATING ARTERY ANEURYSM WITH A MAX DIAMETER OF 4.0MM AND A 2.0MM NECK DIAMETER. IT WAS NOTED THE PATIENT'S BLOOD FLOW WAS NORMAL AND VESSEL TORTUOSITY WAS MODERATE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18535441 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 6, 2022Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT AN AXIUM COIL PREMATURELY DETACHED. THE PATIENT WAS BEING TREATED FOR A NEUROVASCULAR ABNORMALITY. IT WAS NO IN THE ELOQUENT REGION. PATIENT BLOOD FLOW WAS NORMAL AND VESSEL TORTUOSITY WAS MODERATE. THE DEVICES WERE PREPARED ACCORDING TO THE INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE (IFU).  WHILE THE COIL WAS BEING DEPLOYED ON THE ARTERIOVENOUS FISTULA (AVF) LESION, IT WAS DETACHED IN ADVANCE AND PUSHED INTO THE MICROCATHETER. THE COIL WAS IMPLANTED AT THE INTENDED LOCATION AND REMAIN IN THE PATIENT. NO SURGICAL OR MEDICAL INTERVENTION WAS REQUIRED. THE PUSHWIRE WAS NOT BENT OR BROKEN. THERE WAS NO FRICTION OR DIFFICULTY DURING DEPLOYMENT. THE PHYSICIAN DID NOT REPOSITION THE COIL. THEY DID NOT ATTEMPT TO DETACH THE COIL. THEY DID NOT ROTATE THE DELIVERY PUSHER DURING THE PROCEDURE. CONTINUOUS FLUSH WAS ADMINISTERED DURING THE PROCEDURE. NO SYMPTOMS WERE REPORTED. ANCILLARY DEVICES: SL10 MICROCATHETER ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED REPORTED THE EVENT INVOLVED TWO DIFFERENT AXIUM COILS WITH THE SAME LOT NUMBER.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 14311276 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 20, 2022Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT AN AXIUM COIL PREMATURELY DETACHED. THE PATIENT WAS BEING TREATED FOR A NEUROVASCULAR ABNORMALITY. IT WAS NO IN THE ELOQUENT REGION. PATIENT BLOOD FLOW WAS NORMAL AND VESSEL TORTUOSITY WAS MODERATE. THE DEVICES WERE PREPARED ACCORDING TO THE INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE (IFU).  WHILE THE COIL WAS BEING DEPLOYED ON THE ARTERIOVENOUS FISTULA (AVF) LESION, IT WAS DETACHED IN ADVANCE AND PUSHED INTO THE MICROCATHETER. THE COIL WAS IMPLANTED AT THE INTENDED LOCATION AND REMAIN IN THE PATIENT. NO SURGICAL OR MEDICAL INTERVENTION WAS REQUIRED. THE PUSHWIRE WAS NOT BENT OR BROKEN. THERE WAS NO FRICTION OR DIFFICULTY DURING DEPLOYMENT. THE PHYSICIAN DID NOT REPOSITION THE COIL. THEY DID NOT ATTEMPT TO DETACH THE COIL. THEY DID NOT ROTATE THE DELIVERY PUSHER DURING THE PROCEDURE. CONTINUOUS FLUSH WAS ADMINISTERED DURING THE PROCEDURE. NO SYMPTOMS WERE REPORTED. ANCILLARY DEVICES: SL10 MICROCATHETER.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 13834626 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 3, 2022Separation Failure; Separation Failure

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED A REPORT THAT THE COIL WAS NOT ABLE TO BE DETACHED. THE PHYSICIAN ATTEMPTED TO DETACH THE COIL WITH THE DETACHER TWO TIMES. THE PHYSICIAN DID NOT TRY TO DETACH WITH ANOTHER INSTANT DETACHER. THERE WERE TWO MANUAL ATTEMPTS TO DETACH VIA HYPOTUBE. THE REPORTED DEVICE AND ANY ACCESSORY DEVICES PREPARED AS INDICATED IN IFU. NO PATIENT SYMPTOMS OR FURTHER COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.  THE PATIENT WAS UNDERGOING SURGERY FOR TREATMENT OF A SACCULAR, UNRUPTURED ANEURYSM IN THE P-COM WITH A MAX DIAMETER OF 7MM AND A 3MM NECK DIAMETER. IT WAS NOTED THE PATIENT'S BLOOD FLOW WAS NORMAL AND VESSEL TORTUOSITY WAS MODERATE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 13443244 ↗

Recalls under the same FDA submission

These recalls involve devices cleared under K081465. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.

  • Z-0873-2012 · Mar 1, 2010 · Terminated
    Axium Detachable Coil System QC-2-1-Helix The ev3 Axium Detachable Coil System is indicated for the endovascular embolization of intracranial aneurysms and other neurovascular ab
  • Z-0874-2012 · Mar 1, 2010 · Terminated
    Axium Detachable Coil System QC-7-30-Helix The ev3 Axium Detachable Coil System is indicated for the endovascular embolization of intracranial aneurysms and other neurovascular a

Other Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization devices

All Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page