Axium PrimeTM APB-2-2-3D-ESRecalls & reported problems
Micro Therapeutics, Inc. · COIL APB-2-2-3D-ES V04 · Class 2 · Implant
All models of Axium PrimeTM (66)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 5
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00847536031876), received between Jan 15, 2021 and Nov 21, 2022 — classified as 5 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Detachment of Device or Device Component” (4 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Detachment of Device or Device Component4
- Break1
- Difficult or Delayed Positioning1
- Material Deformation1
- Packaging Problem1
- Physical Resistance/Sticking1
- Separation Failure1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions5
Recent adverse event reports
The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionNov 21, 2022Break; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Break; Detachment of Device or Device Component
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED THAT THE PRODUCT COIL COULD NOT BE WITHDRAWN DUE TO ACCIDENTAL DETACH. THE PUSH GUIDE WIRE WAS ABANDONED BY THE HOSPITAL, ONLY THE PACKING BOX WAS GIVEN, AND IT WAS NOT SENT BACK.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 15834091 ↗MalfunctionJun 9, 2022Separation Failure; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Separation Failure; Detachment of Device or Device Component
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED A REPORT THAT THE ONE AXIUM PRIME COIL EXPERIENCED RESISTANCE AND SEPARATED/BROKE/PREMATURELY DETACHED IN THE CATHETER, AND ANOTHER COIL COULD NOT BE DETACHED. THE PATIENT WAS UNDERGOING TREATMENT FOR A RUPTURED, AMORPHOUS ANEURYSM LOCATED IN THE ANTERIOR COMMUNICATING ARTERY. THE MAX DIAMETER WAS 3.8MM, AND THE NECK DIAMETER WAS 3.0MM. THE PATIENT'S BLOOD FLOW WAS NORMAL, AND THEIR VESSEL TORTUOSITY WAS SEVERE. IT WAS REPORTED THAT COIL COULD NOT BE PUSHED OUT OF THE DISTAL PART OF THE MICROCATHETER. AFTER SEVERAL ATTEMPTS, IT WAS FOUND THAT THE SPRING COIL WAS "BROKEN" IN THE MICROCATHETER AFTER IT WAS WITHDRAWN. NO ADDITIONAL MEDICAL OR SURGICAL INTERVENTION WAS REQUIRED. THE PHYSICIAN DID NOT REPOSITION THE COIL, AND NO DETACHMENT ATTEMPTS HAD BEEN MADE. ANOTHER COIL IN THE PROCEDURE COULD NOT BE DETACHED. THREE ATTEMPTS WERE MADE WITH THE INSTANT DETACHER, AND ONE ATTEMPT WAS MADE WITH THE MANUAL METHOD. A SECOND INSTANT DETACHER WAS NOT USED AS THERE WERE NO PROBLEMS WITH IT. AFTER WAITING A FEW MINUTES, IT WAS DECIDED TO WITHDRAW THE COIL; HOWEVER, THE COIL BODY WAS DETACHED IN THE MICROCATHETER DURING THE WITHDRAWAL PROCESS. THE PATIENT DID NOT EXPERIENCE
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 14644210 ↗MalfunctionNov 17, 2021Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED A REPORT THAT THE AXIUM COIL WAS NOT DETACHABLE, SO IT WAS DETACHED INSIDE THE CATHETER WHILE BEING REMOVED. THE COIL WAS REMOVED FROM THE CATHETER. THE DEVICES WERE PREPARED AS INDICATED IN THE IFU. THERE WERE NO SURGICAL OR MEDICINAL INTERVENTIONS REQUIRED. THE PUSHWIRE WAS NOT BENT OR BROKEN. THERE WAS NO FRICTION OR DIFFICULTY DURING DELIVERY. THE PHYSICIAN DID NOT REPOSITION THE COIL. THE PHYSICIAN ATTEMPTED TO DETACH THE COIL TWICE WITH THE INSTANT DETACHER AND TWICE WITH THE MANUAL METHOD. TWO INSTANT DETACHERS WERE USED. THE PHYSICIAN DID NOT ROTATE THE DELIVERY PUSHER DURING PROCEDURE. A CONTINUOUS FLUSH WAS ADMINISTERED DURING THE PROCEDURE. THE PATIENT WAS UNDERGOING SURGERY FOR TREATMENT OF A SACCULAR, UNRUPTURED ANEURYSM IN THE RIGHT ACOM WITH A MAX DIAMETER OF 3MM AND A 1.5MM NECK DIAMETER. IT WAS NOTED THE PATIENT'S BLOOD FLOW WAS NORMAL AND VESSEL TORTUOSITY WAS MODERATE. ANCILLARY DEVICES INCLUDE: FUBUKI 8F GUIDE CATHETER AND A HEADWAY 17 MICROCATHETER.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 12830486 ↗MalfunctionJul 31, 2021Material Deformation; Packaging Problem; Material Deformation; Packaging Problem
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED REPORTED THAT THE PROBLEM WAS THE DISTAL PUSHER ITSELF. IT WAS DAMAGED (GIVING THE IMPRESSION AS IF THE SPRING WAS ALREADY DETACHED).
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 12257058 ↗MalfunctionJan 15, 2021Difficult or Delayed Positioning; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Physical Resistance/Sticking
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED REPORTED THE COIL PUSHED OUT OF THE INTRODUCER SHEATH SMOOTHLY. THERE WAS NO RESISTANCE NOTED AT ANY POINT WHEN THE COIL WAS BEING USED. WHEN THE PHYSICIAN PULLED BACK ON THE COIL TO REPOSITION, IT WAS NOTED THAT THE COIL DID NOT MOVE AND THIS WAS WHEN IT WAS NOTED TO BE DETACHED. THE COIL AND PUSHWIRE REMAINED WITHIN THE CATHETER SO IT WAS UNKNOWN IF THERE WAS ANY DAMAGE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 11179764 ↗
Other DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION devices
- POD RBYPODJ60-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION355 reports
- Penumbra System SCH1Penumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION295 reports
- RUBY Coil RBY4C0860-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION276 reports
- Smart Coil 400SMTHXSFT0208Penumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION165 reports
- Penumbra System RH1-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION154 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0208CSS10Balt USA LLC · Device, Neurovascular Embolization3 recalls3 reports
- POD RBYPOD6-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION148 reports
- POD RBYPODJ30-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION132 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page