Axium PrimeTM APB-3-8-3D-ESRecalls & reported problems
Micro Therapeutics, Inc. · COIL APB-3-8-3D-ES V04 · Class 2 · Implant
All models of Axium PrimeTM (66)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 4
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00847536031944), received between Jan 16, 2020 and Jul 21, 2021 — classified as 4 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Detachment of Device or Device Component” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Detachment of Device or Device Component2
- Separation Failure2
- Stretched2
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient2
Recent adverse event reports
The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionJul 21, 2021Separation Failure; Separation Failure
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED A REPORT THAT THE AXUM PRIME COIL COULD NOT BE DETACHED AFTER 4-5 ATTEMPTS USING THE INSTANT DETACHER. MANUAL DETACHMENT WAS ATTEMPTED AS WELL, BUT THE COIL STILL COULD NOT BE DETACHED. THERE WERE NO ISSUES WITH THE INSTANT DETACHER. THE EVENT WAS SAID TO BE NOT ASSOCIATED WITH A PATIENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 12207237 ↗MalfunctionJun 1, 2021Stretched; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Stretched; Detachment of Device or Device Component
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED REPORTED CLARIFICATION THAT THE CATHETER WAS STRETCHED, NOT SEPARATED. THE CATHETER USED WAS A NON-MEDTRONIC DEVICE. MDR DECISION CORRECTED TO NOT REPORTABLE. NO ADDITIONAL SUPPLEMENTAL REPORTS ARE REQUIRED UNLESS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED INDICATES A REPORTABLE EVENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 11913441 ↗MalfunctionOct 23, 2020Separation Failure; Separation Failure
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED REPORTED THAT THERE WAS NO DAMAGE OBSERVED TO THE PUSHWIRE AFTER REMOVAL.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions; No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 10727353 ↗MalfunctionJan 16, 2020Stretched; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Stretched; Detachment of Device or Device Component
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT THE AXIUM COIL WAS OBSERVED TO BE UNWINDING DURING THE PROCEDURE. PRIOR TO THE EVENT, THE MICROCATHETER WAS DELIVERED TO THE LESION THROUGH THE GUIDE CATHETER. THEN THE AXIUM COIL WAS PUSHED FROM THE MICROCATHETER AND THE SPRING COIL FILLING INTO THE TUMORS. THROUGH THE GUIDING CATHETER ANGIOGRAPHY TAMPONADE AND FOUND THERE WAS SOMETHING ABNORMAL, AND AGAIN THROUGH THE RAY, OBSERVING THE SPRING COIL WAS UNWINDING. THE SPRING COIL WAS TIMELY WITHDRAWN OUT OF THE BODY WITH MICROCATHETER AND GUIDING CATHETER. CONSIDERING THE PATIENT'S SITUATION, THE SURGERY WAS SUSPENDED. IT WAS NOTED THAT THERE WAS COIL PREMATURE DETACHMENT. THE PATIENT WAS UNDERGOING EMBOLIZATION TREATMENT OF AN UNRUPTURED SACCULAR ANEURYSM MEASURING 5MM X 4MM LOCATED IN THE OPHTHALMIC SEGMENT OF THE INTERNAL CAROTID ARTERY (ICA). THE PATIENT¿S BLOOD FLOW WAS NORMAL AND THE VASCULATURE WAS MODERATE IN TORTUOSITY. THE PUSHWIRE WAS BENT OR BROKEN. THERE WAS NO FRICTION OR DIFFICULTY DURING DELIVERY. THE PHYSICIAN DID NOT REPOSITION THE COIL AND DID NOT ATTEMPT TO DETACH THE COIL. THERE WAS NO ROTATING OF THE DELIVERY PUSHER DURING PROCEDURE. A CONTINUOUS FLUSH WAS ADMINISTERED DURIN
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 9598283 ↗
Other Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization devices
- POD RBYPOD8-APenumbra, Inc. · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization195 reports
- CEREPAKTM MDH1Cerenovus, Inc. · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization1 recall72 reports
- Azur CX Detachable 45-750824Microvention, Inc. · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization115 reports
- Tornado G08261Cook Incorporated · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization2 recalls7 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0930CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls4 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0720CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls4 reports
- Prestige Coil System PRES0520HPKPLBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls3 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0413CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls3 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page