AxiumTM PC-3-8-HELIXRecalls & reported problems
Micro Therapeutics, Inc. · COIL PC-3-8-HELIX V04 · Class 2 · Implant
All models of AxiumTM (139)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 3
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00847536033016), received between Jun 13, 2022 and Jun 13, 2022 — classified as 3 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (3 reports).
2 other recalls cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K081465); they may or may not involve this specific model.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Break3
- Physical Resistance/Sticking3
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3
Recent adverse event reports
The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionJun 13, 2022Break; Physical Resistance/Sticking; Break; Physical Resistance/Sticking
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION REGARDING TWO AXIUM COILS OF THE SAME MODEL AND LOT THAT HAD RESISTANCE IN THE SHEATH AND AT THE CATHETER HUB. IT WAS REPORTED THAT SIGNIFICANT RESISTANCE WAS FELT AS THE DISTAL TIP OF THE COIL LEFT THE COILING SHEATH AND BEGAN ENTERING INTO THE CATHETER HUB. THE SURGEON FELT THE NON-TAPERED DISTAL SEGMENT OF THE COIL SHEATH AND GAP BETWEEN THE NON-TAPERED SHEATH AND THE HUB OF THE NON-MEDTRONIC BALLOON CATHETER "MAY CAUSE THE AXIUM COIL TO BREAK PREMATURELY AT THE GAP CAUSING HEAVY RESISTANCE TO OCCUR." THE COIL WAS REPLACED BY ANOTHER MANUFACTURER'S PRODUCT TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THE EVENT WAS NOT ASSOCIATED WITH A PATIENT. CONCOMITANT DEVICE: MICROVENTION SCEPTOR C BALLOON ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED REPORTED THAT THERE WAS NO MALFORMATION OR DEFECT NOTED IN THE COILING SHEATH. THE DOCTOR STATED THAT AS THE NON-TAPERED COILING SHEATH OF MICRFX COIL ENTERS THE HUB A GAP CAN OCCUR WHICH CAUSES THE COIL THE BREAK AND THUS LEADS TO THE HEAVY RESISTANCE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 14681467 ↗MalfunctionJun 13, 2022Break; Physical Resistance/Sticking; Break; Physical Resistance/Sticking
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED REPORTED THAT BOTH COILS ENCOUNTERED HEAVY RESISTANCE AT THE GAP BETWEEN NON TAPED COILING SHEATH AND MICROCATHETER HUB. THE BREAK WAS LOCATED AT THE GAP BETWEEN NON TAPERED COILING SHEATH ENTERING HUB OF THE MICROCATHETER. NO OTHER DAMAGES WERE NOTED BY THE PHYSICIAN IN REGARDS TO THE COILS.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 14681403 ↗MalfunctionJun 13, 2022Break; Physical Resistance/Sticking; Break; Physical Resistance/Sticking
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION REPORTING THAT THREE AXIUM COILS HAD SIGNIFICANT RESISTANCE IN THE SHEATH WHEN TRYING TO ADVANCE INTO THE CATHETER HUB DUE TO ROBBIN-TAPERED COIL SHEATH. IT WAS NOTED THAT THE COILS AND ALL ACCESSORY DEVICES WERE PREPARED AS INDICATED IN THE INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE (IFU). NO PATIENT SYMPTOMS OR INJURY WERE REPORTED. ANCILLARY DEVICE: STRYKER SL-10 MICROCATHETER ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED REPORTED THAT THERE WAS NO MALFORMATION OR SUSPECTED DEFECT OF THE COIL SHEATH. THE GAP BETWEEN THE COILING SHEATH AND HUB CAUSED THE COIL TO BREAK BEFORE ENTERING THE COILING CATHETER CAUSING THE HEAVY RESISTANCE. THE COIL NEVER ENTERED INTO THE COILING CATHETER OR PATIENT. THERE WERE NO COMPLICATIONS AS THEY WERE NOT USED WITH THE PATIENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 14681301 ↗
Recalls under the same FDA submission
These recalls involve devices cleared under K081465. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.
- Z-0873-2012 · Mar 1, 2010 · TerminatedAxium Detachable Coil System QC-2-1-Helix The ev3 Axium Detachable Coil System is indicated for the endovascular embolization of intracranial aneurysms and other neurovascular ab
- Z-0874-2012 · Mar 1, 2010 · TerminatedAxium Detachable Coil System QC-7-30-Helix The ev3 Axium Detachable Coil System is indicated for the endovascular embolization of intracranial aneurysms and other neurovascular a
Other Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization devices
- POD RBYPOD8-APenumbra, Inc. · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization195 reports
- CEREPAKTM MDH1Cerenovus, Inc. · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization1 recall72 reports
- Azur CX Detachable 45-750824Microvention, Inc. · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization115 reports
- Tornado G08261Cook Incorporated · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization2 recalls7 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0930CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls4 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0720CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls4 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0413CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls3 reports
- Prestige Coil System PRES0520HPKPLBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls3 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page