ConcertoTM NV-5-15-HELIX (UDI 00847536033559)Recalls & reported problems
Micro Therapeutics, Inc. · COIL NV-5-15-HELIX V06 · Class 2 · Implant
All models of ConcertoTM (70)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 7
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 7 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00847536033559), received between Jul 24, 2020 and Feb 6, 2024 — classified as 7 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Separation Failure” (3 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Separation Failure3
- Break1
- Detachment of Device or Device Component1
- Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size1
- Physical Resistance/Sticking1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions6
- Vasoconstriction1
Recent adverse event reports
The 7 most recent of 7 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionFeb 6, 2024Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size; Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED A REPORT THAT THE CONCERTO COIL HAD NO LOOP FORMATION DURING THE PROCEDURE. THE CONCERTO COIL AND ANY ACCESSORIES WERE PREPARED AS INDICATED IN THE INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE (IFU). NO PATIENT SYMPTOMS OR FURTHER COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 18651737 ↗MalfunctionMar 14, 2023Separation Failure; Separation Failure
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED REPORTED THAT PRIOR TO COIL NON-DETACHMENT, THERE WERE NO ISSUES ENCOUNTERED. NO PUSHWIRE DAMAGE WAS OBSERVED AFTER REMOVAL FROM THE PATIENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 16542584 ↗MalfunctionDec 15, 2021Separation Failure; Separation Failure
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED A REPORT THAT THE COIL DID NOT DETACH WITH BOTH METHODS. A NEW MEDTRONIC DEVICE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THE DEVICES WERE PREPARED AS INDICATED IN THE IFU. THERE WERE NO PATIENT SYMPTOMS OR COMPLICATIONS ASSOCIATED WITH THE EVENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 13015096 ↗MalfunctionOct 5, 2021Separation Failure; Separation Failure
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED INDICATING THERE WERE NO ISSUES ENCOUNTERED PRIOR TO THE NON-DETACHMENT. THERE WAS NO PUSHWIRE DAMAGE OBSERVED AFTER THE REMOVAL FROM THE PATIENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 12576640 ↗MalfunctionApr 21, 2021Physical Resistance/Sticking; Physical Resistance/Sticking
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED REPORTED THERE WAS NO DAMAGE OBSERVED TO THE COIL PUSHWIRE OR THE INSTANT DETACHER.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 11703561 ↗MalfunctionMar 23, 2021Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component
IT WAS REPORTED THAT IN THE PROCESS OF FOLLOWING THE IFU, COIL DETACHMENT OCCURRED BEFORE THE PHYSICIAN DETACHED IT INTENTIONALLY. THE PATIENT WAS UNDERGOING SURGERY TO TREAT AN ANEURYSM OF THE ILIAC ARTERY - COMMON. THERE WERE NO ABNORMALITIES REPORTED IN RELATION TO THE ANATOMY. THERE WERE NO PATIENT SYMPTOMS ASSOCIATED WITH THE EVENT. THE DEVICES WERE PREPARED AS INDICATED IN THE IFU.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 11557890 ↗MalfunctionJul 24, 2020Break; Break
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED REPORTED THE DEVICE UNRAVELED AT THE PROXIMAL END FROM THE DELIVERY WIRE. THE PATIENT WAS DOING WELL, AND THERE WAS NO IMPACT NOTED AT POST PROCEDURE IMAGING THE NEXT DAY. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT HAD STENOSIS IN THE VESSELS PRIOR TO THE PROCEDURE, AND SHORT TERM PHARMACEUTICAL MANAGEMENT ADDRESSED THE SPASM. THE PATIENT WAS BEING TREATED FOR GASTRODUODENAL ARTERY EMBOLIZATION. THE VESSEL WAS 4-5 MM.
Patient problems: Vasoconstriction
MAUDE report 10320134 ↗
Other Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization devices
- POD RBYPOD8-APenumbra, Inc. · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization195 reports
- CEREPAKTM MDH1Cerenovus, Inc. · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization1 recall72 reports
- Azur CX Detachable 45-750824Microvention, Inc. · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization115 reports
- Tornado G08261Cook Incorporated · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization2 recalls7 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0930CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls4 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0720CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls4 reports
- Prestige Coil System PRES0520HPKPLBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls3 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0413CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls3 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page