Skip to content

ConcertoTM PV-3-6-3D (UDI 00847536033733)Recalls & reported problems

Micro Therapeutics, Inc. · COIL PV-3-6-3D V04 · Class 2 · Implant

All models of ConcertoTM (70)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
5
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00847536033733), received between Jun 6, 2022 and May 10, 2024 — classified as 5 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Separation Failure” (4 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 2 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 1 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Separation Failure4
  • Physical Resistance/Sticking2
  • Break1
  • Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions5

Recent adverse event reports

The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionMay 10, 2024Physical Resistance/Sticking; Physical Resistance/Sticking

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED A REPORT THAT THREE CONCERTO COILS WOULD NOT ADVANCE IN MICROCATHETER VERY FAR BEFORE GETTING STUCK. ONLY WOULD ADVANCE JUST PAST THE HUB. IT WAS REPORTED THERE WAS COIL RESISTANCE/STUCK IN THE PROXIMAL SECTION OF THE CATHETER. THE COIL (LOT # 227937283) DID PUSH SMOOTHLY OUT FROM THE INTRODUCER SHEATH. NO PATIENT SYMPTOMS OR FURTHER COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED REPORTING THE CAUSE OF THE RESISTANCE WAS NOT DETERMINED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19288229 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 9, 2023Separation Failure; Separation Failure

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED A REPORT THAT THERE WAS 2 CONCERTO COIL'S THAT DID NOT DEPLOY FROM THE CATHETER. THE CONCERTO COIL AND ANY ACCESSORIES WERE PREPARED AS INDICATED IN THE INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE (IFU). NO PATIENT SYMPTOMS OR FURTHER COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18106181 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 9, 2023Separation Failure; Separation Failure

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED A REPORT THAT THERE WAS 2 CONCERTO COIL'S THAT DID NOT DEPLOY FROM THE CATHETER. THE CONCERTO COIL AND ANY ACCESSORIES WERE PREPARED AS INDICATED IN THE INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE (IFU). NO PATIENT SYMPTOMS OR FURTHER COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18106160 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 4, 2022Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size; Separation Failure; Physical Resistance/Sticking; Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size; Separation Failure; Physical Resistance/Sticking

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED A REPORT THAT 2 CONCERTO COILS GOT STUCK IN THE MICROCATHETER DURING DELIVERY. THE COILS DID NOT DETACH SUCCESSFULLY, AND THERE WAS COIL COMPACTION. THE COILS WERE REMOVED AND DID NOT CAUSE HARM TO THE PATIENT. SIX OTHER CONCERTO COILS WERE USED IN THE PROCEDURE. THE PATIENT WAS UNDERGOING TREATMENT FOR GASTROINTESTINAL BLEED EMBOLIZATION. THIS WAS NOT A RE-EMBOLIZATION PROCEDURE. ANCILLARY DEVICES INCLUDE A PROGREAT 2.4 MICROCATHETER.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 15730662 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 6, 2022Break; Separation Failure; Break; Separation Failure

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED A REPORT THAT THE CONCERTO COIL WAS NOT ABLE TO BE DETACHED. THE COIL WAS DETACHED MANUALLY WITH BREAKAGE AT THE DISTAL MARKER. THE FILAMENT BROKE OFF AND COMPLETELY JUMPED BACK INTO THE HUB. THERE WAS NO FILAMENT TO PULL IN ORDER TO DETACH. THE PATIENT DID NOT EXPERIENCE ANY INJURY OR COMPLICATIONS. THE DEVICES WERE PREPARED ACCORDING TO THE INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE (IFU). THE PATIENT WAS UNDERGOING TREATMENT FOR EMBOLIZATION OF THE RIGHT PROXIMAL RENAL ARTERY. THE DEGREE OF TORTUOSITY AND CALCIFICATION WAS SAID TO BE LITTLE. THERE WERE NO ABNORMALITIES WITH THE ANATOMY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 14603336 ↗

Other Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization devices

All Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page