ConcertoTM PV-3-6-3D (UDI 00847536033733)Recalls & reported problems
Micro Therapeutics, Inc. · COIL PV-3-6-3D V04 · Class 2 · Implant
All models of ConcertoTM (70)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 5
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00847536033733), received between Jun 6, 2022 and May 10, 2024 — classified as 5 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Separation Failure” (4 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Separation Failure4
- Physical Resistance/Sticking2
- Break1
- Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions5
Recent adverse event reports
The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionMay 10, 2024Physical Resistance/Sticking; Physical Resistance/Sticking
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED A REPORT THAT THREE CONCERTO COILS WOULD NOT ADVANCE IN MICROCATHETER VERY FAR BEFORE GETTING STUCK. ONLY WOULD ADVANCE JUST PAST THE HUB. IT WAS REPORTED THERE WAS COIL RESISTANCE/STUCK IN THE PROXIMAL SECTION OF THE CATHETER. THE COIL (LOT # 227937283) DID PUSH SMOOTHLY OUT FROM THE INTRODUCER SHEATH. NO PATIENT SYMPTOMS OR FURTHER COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED REPORTING THE CAUSE OF THE RESISTANCE WAS NOT DETERMINED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19288229 ↗MalfunctionNov 9, 2023Separation Failure; Separation Failure
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED A REPORT THAT THERE WAS 2 CONCERTO COIL'S THAT DID NOT DEPLOY FROM THE CATHETER. THE CONCERTO COIL AND ANY ACCESSORIES WERE PREPARED AS INDICATED IN THE INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE (IFU). NO PATIENT SYMPTOMS OR FURTHER COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 18106181 ↗MalfunctionNov 9, 2023Separation Failure; Separation Failure
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED A REPORT THAT THERE WAS 2 CONCERTO COIL'S THAT DID NOT DEPLOY FROM THE CATHETER. THE CONCERTO COIL AND ANY ACCESSORIES WERE PREPARED AS INDICATED IN THE INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE (IFU). NO PATIENT SYMPTOMS OR FURTHER COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 18106160 ↗MalfunctionNov 4, 2022Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size; Separation Failure; Physical Resistance/Sticking; Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size; Separation Failure; Physical Resistance/Sticking
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED A REPORT THAT 2 CONCERTO COILS GOT STUCK IN THE MICROCATHETER DURING DELIVERY. THE COILS DID NOT DETACH SUCCESSFULLY, AND THERE WAS COIL COMPACTION. THE COILS WERE REMOVED AND DID NOT CAUSE HARM TO THE PATIENT. SIX OTHER CONCERTO COILS WERE USED IN THE PROCEDURE. THE PATIENT WAS UNDERGOING TREATMENT FOR GASTROINTESTINAL BLEED EMBOLIZATION. THIS WAS NOT A RE-EMBOLIZATION PROCEDURE. ANCILLARY DEVICES INCLUDE A PROGREAT 2.4 MICROCATHETER.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 15730662 ↗MalfunctionJun 6, 2022Break; Separation Failure; Break; Separation Failure
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED A REPORT THAT THE CONCERTO COIL WAS NOT ABLE TO BE DETACHED. THE COIL WAS DETACHED MANUALLY WITH BREAKAGE AT THE DISTAL MARKER. THE FILAMENT BROKE OFF AND COMPLETELY JUMPED BACK INTO THE HUB. THERE WAS NO FILAMENT TO PULL IN ORDER TO DETACH. THE PATIENT DID NOT EXPERIENCE ANY INJURY OR COMPLICATIONS. THE DEVICES WERE PREPARED ACCORDING TO THE INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE (IFU). THE PATIENT WAS UNDERGOING TREATMENT FOR EMBOLIZATION OF THE RIGHT PROXIMAL RENAL ARTERY. THE DEGREE OF TORTUOSITY AND CALCIFICATION WAS SAID TO BE LITTLE. THERE WERE NO ABNORMALITIES WITH THE ANATOMY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 14603336 ↗
Other Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization devices
- POD RBYPOD8-APenumbra, Inc. · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization195 reports
- CEREPAKTM MDH1Cerenovus, Inc. · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization1 recall72 reports
- Azur CX Detachable 45-750824Microvention, Inc. · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization115 reports
- Tornado G08261Cook Incorporated · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization2 recalls7 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0930CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls4 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0720CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls4 reports
- Prestige Coil System PRES0520HPKPLBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls3 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0413CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls3 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page