ConcertoTM PV-12-40-3DRecalls & reported problems
Micro Therapeutics, Inc. · COIL PV-12-40-3D V04 · Class 2 · Implant
All models of ConcertoTM (70)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 1
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 00847536033832), received between Mar 9, 2021 and Mar 9, 2021 — classified as 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Break1
- Physical Resistance/Sticking1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
Recent adverse event reports
The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionMar 9, 2021Break; Physical Resistance/Sticking; Break; Physical Resistance/Sticking
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED A REPORT THAT DURING DEPLOYMENT OF THE CONCERTO COIL, THE COIL BECAME LODGED IN THE DISTAL END OF THE MICROCATHETER. THE PHYSICIAN TRIED TO PULL THE COIL BACK FOR REPOSITIONING, BUT IT WOULD NOT MOVE. THEN AN ATTEMPT AT ADVANCEMENT WAS MADE, BUT THE COIL WOULD NOT MOVE. ON THE SECOND ATTEMPT TO WITHDRAW THE COIL, THE INTRODUCER WIRE CAME OUT OF THE MICROCATHETER WITH A SMALL PIECE OF THE COIL STILL ATTACHED: THE COIL HAD BROKEN. THE REST OF THE COIL WAS STILL IN THE MICROCATHETER IN THE PATIENT. THE PHYSICIAN THEN REMOVED THE MICROCATHETER AND DIAGNOSTIC CATHETER TOGETHER WHICH ALLOWED FOR THE REST OF THE COIL TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT INCIDENT. IT WAS NOTED THERE WAS NO DAMAGE TO THE MICROCATHETER, NO FRICTION OR DIFFICULTY DURING TESTING OR DELIVERY UP UNTIL THE DISTAL SEGMENT, A CONTINUOUS FLUSH HAD NOT BEEN USED, REPOSITIONING WAS PERFORMED ONCE, THE PUSHWIRE WAS NOT DAMAGED, NO DETACHMENT ATTEMPTS HAD BEEN MADE, IT WAS UNKNOWN IF THE PUSHWIRE HAD BEEN ROTATED, AND NO MEDICAL OR SURGICAL INTERVENTION WAS REQUIRED. IT W AS INDICATED THAT ALL DEVICES WERE PREPARED AS PER THE INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE (IFU), AND NO PATIENT SYMPTOMS OR FURTHER COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 11444613 ↗
Other Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization devices
- POD RBYPOD8-APenumbra, Inc. · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization195 reports
- CEREPAKTM MDH1Cerenovus, Inc. · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization1 recall72 reports
- Azur CX Detachable 45-750824Microvention, Inc. · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization115 reports
- Tornado G08261Cook Incorporated · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization2 recalls7 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0930CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls4 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0720CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls4 reports
- Prestige Coil System PRES0520HPKPLBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls3 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0413CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls3 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page