Axium Detachable Coil System QC-1.5-3-HELIXRecalls & reported problems
Micro Therapeutics, Inc. · COIL QC-1.5-3-HELIX V05 · Class 2 · Implant
All models of Axium Detachable Coil System (69)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 2
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00847536037236), received between Jul 26, 2024 and May 5, 2025 — classified as 2 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (1 report).
2 other recalls cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K081465); they may or may not involve this specific model.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Break1
- Detachment of Device or Device Component1
- Material Deformation1
- Physical Resistance/Sticking1
- Stretched1
Patient problems
- Foreign Body In Patient1
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
Recent adverse event reports
The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionMay 5, 2025Material Deformation; Physical Resistance/Sticking; Material Deformation; Physical Resistance/Sticking
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A PROCEDURE INVOLVING THE ECHELON 14 MICRO CATHETER AND BARE AXIUM HELICAL COIL, RESISTANCE WAS ENCOUNTERED AT THE CATHETER HUB, AND THE COIL COULD NOT BE ADVANCED INTO THE CATHETER. THE COIL BECAME STUCK AT THE CATHETER HUB AND WAS NOTED TO BE BENT. ADDITIONALLY, DAMAGE WAS OBSERVED AT THE PROXIMAL CATHETER, AND THE COIL ITSELF WAS ALSO REPORTED TO BE DAMAGED, THOUGH THE SPECIFIC LOCATION OF THE COIL DAMAGE WAS NOT IDENTIFIED. THE CATHETER AND COIL WERE PREPARED AND FLUSHED AS INDICATED IN THE INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE. THE TIP OF THE SHEATH WAS SEATED SECURELY IN THE HUB, BUT THE IMPLANT COIL DID NOT PUSH SMOOTHLY OUT FROM THE INTRODUCER SHEATH. THE DEVICES ARE EXPECTED TO BE RETURNED FOR EVALUATION. THE PATIENT OUTCOME WAS REPORTED AS ALIVE WITH NO INJURY. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED REPORTED THAT THERE ARE 2 POTENTIAL CAUSES: ECHELON ERROR IS MAIN CAUSE (EX: THERE IS A QUITE LONG DISTANCE BETWEEN INTRODUCER SHEATH AND MICROCATHETER); THE TIP OF THE COIL IS CURVE (NOT STRAIGHT).
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21963574 ↗MalfunctionJul 26, 2024Break; Stretched; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Break; Stretched; Detachment of Device or Device Component
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED A REPORT THAT THE SPRING COIL WAS AUTOMATICALLY STRETCHED AND THE COIL BODY WIRE DRAWN. LATER, AFTER IT WAS DETACHED, PART OF IT REMAINED IN THE PATIENT'S BODY, AND PART OF IT WAS REMOVED FROM THE BODY (PARTIAL REMOVAL) ALONG WITH THE PUSHER. THERE WAS COIL SEPARATION/BREAK/PREMATURE DETACHMENT. NO PATIENT SYMPTOMS OR FURTHER COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT. THE DEVICE AND ANY ACCESSORIES WERE PREPARED AS INDICATED IN THE IFU. THERE WAS NO SURGICAL OR MEDICINAL INTERVENTION REQUIRED. THE PUSHWIRE WAS BENT OR BROKEN (NOT ON PURPOSE. THERE WAS NO FRICTION OR DIFFICULTY DURING DELIVERY. THE PHYSICIAN DID NOT REPOSITION THE COIL. THE PHYSICIAN ATTEMPTED TO DETACH THE COIL. THE PHYSICIAN DID NOT ATTEMPT TO DETACH THE COIL WITH THE INSTANT DETACHER. THE PHYSICIAN ATTEMPTED TO DETACH THE COIL USING THE MANUAL METHOD ONE TIME. NO INSTANT DETACHERS WERE USED. THE PHYSICIAN DID NOT ROTATE THE DELIVERY PUSHER DURING PROCEDURE. CONTINUOUS FLUSH WAS ADMINISTERED DURING THE PROCEDURE. THE PATIENT WAS UNDERGOING SURGERY FOR TREATMENT OF A SACCULAR, UNRUPTURED POSTERIOR COMMUNICATING ARTERY ANEURYSM WITH A MAX DIAMETER OF 5.3MM AND A 4.7MM NECK DIAMETER. I
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 19839610 ↗
Recalls under the same FDA submission
These recalls involve devices cleared under K081465. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.
- Z-0874-2012 · Mar 1, 2010 · TerminatedAxium Detachable Coil System QC-7-30-Helix The ev3 Axium Detachable Coil System is indicated for the endovascular embolization of intracranial aneurysms and other neurovascular a
- Z-0873-2012 · Mar 1, 2010 · TerminatedAxium Detachable Coil System QC-2-1-Helix The ev3 Axium Detachable Coil System is indicated for the endovascular embolization of intracranial aneurysms and other neurovascular ab
Other Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization devices
- POD RBYPOD8-APenumbra, Inc. · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization195 reports
- CEREPAKTM MDH1Cerenovus, Inc. · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization1 recall72 reports
- Azur CX Detachable 45-750824Microvention, Inc. · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization115 reports
- Tornado G08261Cook Incorporated · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization2 recalls7 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0930CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls4 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0720CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls4 reports
- Prestige Coil System PRES0520HPKPLBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls3 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0413CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls3 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page