Axium Detachable Coil System QC-4-12-HELIXRecalls & reported problems
Micro Therapeutics, Inc. · Coil QC-4-12-HELIX V05 · Class 2 · Implant
All models of Axium Detachable Coil System (69)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 5
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00847536037403), received between May 19, 2022 and Dec 16, 2025 — classified as 1 injury, 4 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Detachment of Device or Device Component” (4 reports).
2 other recalls cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K081465); they may or may not involve this specific model.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Detachment of Device or Device Component4
- Break2
- Physical Resistance/Sticking2
- Separation Failure2
- Stretched1
- Therapy Delivered to Incorrect Body Area1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions4
- Foreign Body In Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryDec 16, 2025Break; Therapy Delivered to Incorrect Body Area; Stretched; Separation Failure; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Break; Therapy Delivered to Incorrect Body Area; Stretched; Separation Failure; Detachment of Device or Device Component
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED THAT THERE WAS COIL BREAK/SEPARATION AS WELL AS PREMATURE DETACHMENT. THE COIL PREMATURELY DETACHED FROM NON-DETACHMENT. THERE WERE NO ISSUES WITH THE ECHELON. THE CAUSE OF THE EVENT WAS NOT DETERMINED. THERE WAS NO KINK/DAMAGE OBSERVED ON THE PUSHWIRE. IT WAS NOTED THERE WERE NO ISSUES WITH THE INSTANT DETACHER.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 23824538 ↗MalfunctionNov 5, 2025Break; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Break; Detachment of Device or Device Component
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED. THE LESION WAS AN OCCLUSION OF BLOOD VESSELS MEASURING ABOUT 3 MM. THE PATIENT IS RECOVERING NORMALLY AND DID NOT EXPERIENCE ANY SYMPTOMS RELATED TO COIL PREMATURE DETACHMENT OR DAMAGE. AN ABNORMALITY WAS FELT DURING THE PROCESS OF DELIVERING THE COIL INTO THE MICROCATHETER THROUGH THE INTRODUCER SHEATH, AND IT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY DISCOVERED THAT THE COIL HAD BEEN PREMATURELY DETACHED. THE DAMAGE OR FRACTURE WAS NOT IN ADDITION TO THE DETACHMENT. ALL DEVICES AND ACCESSORIES WERE PREPARED AS INDICATED IN THE IFU. THE CAUSES OF THE PREMATURE DETACHMENT AND COIL DAMAGE WERE NOT DETERMINED, AND NO ISSUES WERE IDENTIFIED THAT RESULTED IN THE OBSERVED DAMAGE. NO DETACHMENT ATTEMPTS WERE MADE USING AN INSTANT DETACHER OR MANUAL METHOD. IT WAS UNKNOWN IF ANY KINK OR DAMAGE OBSERVED ON THE PUSHWIRE SINCE IT WAS DISCARDED BY THE CUSTOMER.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23479348 ↗MalfunctionJan 18, 2024Separation Failure; Separation Failure
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED A REPORT THAT AFTER OPENING THE PACKAGE, THE AXIUM SPRING COIL HYDRATION DELIVERY MICROCATHETER WAS FOUND TO BE UNABLE TO BE DEPLOYED AFTER IT WAS IN PLACE. THE COIL WAS WITHDRAWN. THE REPORTED DEVICE AND ANY ACCESSORY DEVICES WERE PREPARED AS INDICATED IN THE INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE (IFU). NO PATIENT SYMPTOMS OR FURTHER COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT. IT WAS CLARIFIED THAT THE COIL DID NOT EXPERIENCE ANY RESISTANCE IN THE MICROCATHETER, AND THE COIL HAD COME OUT OF THE INTRODUCER SHEATH SMOOTHLY. THERE WAS NO KINK/DAMAGE OBSERVED TO THE COIL. THE CATHETER USED WAS A MEDTRONIC PRODUCT, BUT THE MODEL/LOT # WERE NOT RECORDED. THE PATIENT WAS UNDERGOING SURGERY FOR TREATMENT OF A SACCULAR, RUPTURED ANEURYSM IN THE LEFT INTERNAL CAROTID ARTERY IN THE C4 SEGMENT WITH A MAX DIAMETER OF 5 MM AND A 2 MM NECK DIAMETER. IT WAS NOTED THE PATIENT'S BLOOD FLOW WAS NORMAL AND VESSEL TORTUOSITY WAS NORMAL.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 18536371 ↗MalfunctionDec 8, 2023Detachment of Device or Device Component; Physical Resistance/Sticking; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Physical Resistance/Sticking
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED THAT THE RESISTANCE WAS LOCATED IN THE PROXIMAL SECTION. THE COIL CAME OUT OF THE INTRODUCER SHEATH SMOOTHLY. THE CATHETER WAS A MEDTRONIC PRODUCT BUT THE LOT AND MODEL NUMBER ARE UNKNOWN. THERE WERE NO DETACHMENT ATTEMPTS (INSTANT DETACHER OR MANUAL METHOD) MADE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 18296763 ↗MalfunctionMay 19, 2022Detachment of Device or Device Component; Physical Resistance/Sticking; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Physical Resistance/Sticking
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT AN AXIUM COIL HAD RESISTANCE IN THE CATHETER AND PREMATURELY DETACHED. IN THE PROCESS OF PUSHING THE COIL, THE SURGEON FOUND THAT IT HAD ABNORMAL RESISTANCE. AFTER WITHDRAWING AND CHECKING THE SPRING COIL, AND FOUND THAT IT WAS AUTOMATICALLY DETACHED. AT THE SAME TIME, THERE WAS NO VIOLENT OPERATION BY THE SURGEON. IT WAS NOT IMPLANTED IN THE BODY, AND IT WAS RETURNED WHEN THE RESISTANCE WAS ABNORMAL AT THE Y VALVE. THE PUSHWIRE WAS NOT BENT OR BROKEN. THERE WAS NO OTHER FRICTION OR DIFFICULTY DURING DELIVERY/ THE PHYSICIAN DID NOT REPOSITION THE COIL OR ATTEMPT TO DETACH THE COIL. THEY DID NOT ATTEMPT TO ROTATE THE DELIVERY PUSHER DURING THE PROCEDURE. CONTINUOUS FLUSH WAS NOT ADMINISTERED DURING THE PROCEDURE. THE DEVICES WERE PREPARED ACCORDING TO THE INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE (IFU). THE PATIENT WAS BEING TREATED FOR AN UNRUPTURED, AMORPHOUS ANEURYSM IN THE OPHTHALMIC ARTERY. THE MAX DIAMETER WAS 5.67MM AND THE NECK DIAMETER WAS 3.32MM. PATIENT'S BLOOD FLOW AND VESSEL TORTUOSITY WAS NORMAL. NO SYMPTOMS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 14437776 ↗
Recalls under the same FDA submission
These recalls involve devices cleared under K081465. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.
- Z-0874-2012 · Mar 1, 2010 · TerminatedAxium Detachable Coil System QC-7-30-Helix The ev3 Axium Detachable Coil System is indicated for the endovascular embolization of intracranial aneurysms and other neurovascular a
- Z-0873-2012 · Mar 1, 2010 · TerminatedAxium Detachable Coil System QC-2-1-Helix The ev3 Axium Detachable Coil System is indicated for the endovascular embolization of intracranial aneurysms and other neurovascular ab
Other Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization devices
- POD RBYPOD8-APenumbra, Inc. · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization195 reports
- CEREPAKTM MDH1Cerenovus, Inc. · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization1 recall72 reports
- Azur CX Detachable 45-750824Microvention, Inc. · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization115 reports
- Tornado G08261Cook Incorporated · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization2 recalls7 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0930CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls4 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0720CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls4 reports
- Prestige Coil System PRES0520HPKPLBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls3 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0413CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls3 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page