Skip to content

Axium Detachable Coil System QC-4-12-HELIXRecalls & reported problems

Micro Therapeutics, Inc. · Coil QC-4-12-HELIX V05 · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Axium Detachable Coil System (69)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
5
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00847536037403), received between May 19, 2022 and Dec 16, 2025 — classified as 1 injury, 4 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Detachment of Device or Device Component” (4 reports).

2 other recalls cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K081465); they may or may not involve this specific model.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 1 reportsJan 2024: 1 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 1 reportsDec 2025: 1 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Detachment of Device or Device Component4
  • Break2
  • Physical Resistance/Sticking2
  • Separation Failure2
  • Stretched1
  • Therapy Delivered to Incorrect Body Area1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions4
  • Foreign Body In Patient1

Recent adverse event reports

The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryDec 16, 2025Break; Therapy Delivered to Incorrect Body Area; Stretched; Separation Failure; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Break; Therapy Delivered to Incorrect Body Area; Stretched; Separation Failure; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED THAT THERE WAS COIL BREAK/SEPARATION AS WELL AS PREMATURE DETACHMENT. THE COIL PREMATURELY DETACHED FROM NON-DETACHMENT. THERE WERE NO ISSUES WITH THE ECHELON. THE CAUSE OF THE EVENT WAS NOT DETERMINED. THERE WAS NO KINK/DAMAGE OBSERVED ON THE PUSHWIRE. IT WAS NOTED THERE WERE NO ISSUES WITH THE INSTANT DETACHER.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 23824538 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 5, 2025Break; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Break; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED. THE LESION WAS AN OCCLUSION OF BLOOD VESSELS MEASURING ABOUT 3 MM. THE PATIENT IS RECOVERING NORMALLY AND DID NOT EXPERIENCE ANY SYMPTOMS RELATED TO COIL PREMATURE DETACHMENT OR DAMAGE. AN ABNORMALITY WAS FELT DURING THE PROCESS OF DELIVERING THE COIL INTO THE MICROCATHETER THROUGH THE INTRODUCER SHEATH, AND IT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY DISCOVERED THAT THE COIL HAD BEEN PREMATURELY DETACHED. THE DAMAGE OR FRACTURE WAS NOT IN ADDITION TO THE DETACHMENT. ALL DEVICES AND ACCESSORIES WERE PREPARED AS INDICATED IN THE IFU. THE CAUSES OF THE PREMATURE DETACHMENT AND COIL DAMAGE WERE NOT DETERMINED, AND NO ISSUES WERE IDENTIFIED THAT RESULTED IN THE OBSERVED DAMAGE. NO DETACHMENT ATTEMPTS WERE MADE USING AN INSTANT DETACHER OR MANUAL METHOD. IT WAS UNKNOWN IF ANY KINK OR DAMAGE OBSERVED ON THE PUSHWIRE SINCE IT WAS DISCARDED BY THE CUSTOMER.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23479348 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 18, 2024Separation Failure; Separation Failure

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED A REPORT THAT AFTER OPENING THE PACKAGE, THE AXIUM SPRING COIL HYDRATION DELIVERY MICROCATHETER WAS FOUND TO BE UNABLE TO BE DEPLOYED AFTER IT WAS IN PLACE. THE COIL WAS WITHDRAWN. THE REPORTED DEVICE AND ANY ACCESSORY DEVICES WERE PREPARED AS INDICATED IN THE INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE (IFU). NO PATIENT SYMPTOMS OR FURTHER COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT. IT WAS CLARIFIED THAT THE COIL DID NOT EXPERIENCE ANY RESISTANCE IN THE MICROCATHETER, AND THE COIL HAD COME OUT OF THE INTRODUCER SHEATH SMOOTHLY. THERE WAS NO KINK/DAMAGE OBSERVED TO THE COIL. THE CATHETER USED WAS A MEDTRONIC PRODUCT, BUT THE MODEL/LOT # WERE NOT RECORDED. THE PATIENT WAS UNDERGOING SURGERY FOR TREATMENT OF A SACCULAR, RUPTURED ANEURYSM IN THE LEFT INTERNAL CAROTID ARTERY IN THE C4 SEGMENT WITH A MAX DIAMETER OF 5 MM AND A 2 MM NECK DIAMETER. IT WAS NOTED THE PATIENT'S BLOOD FLOW WAS NORMAL AND VESSEL TORTUOSITY WAS NORMAL.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18536371 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 8, 2023Detachment of Device or Device Component; Physical Resistance/Sticking; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Physical Resistance/Sticking

    ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED THAT THE RESISTANCE WAS LOCATED IN THE PROXIMAL SECTION. THE COIL CAME OUT OF THE INTRODUCER SHEATH SMOOTHLY. THE CATHETER WAS A MEDTRONIC PRODUCT BUT THE LOT AND MODEL NUMBER ARE UNKNOWN. THERE WERE NO DETACHMENT ATTEMPTS (INSTANT DETACHER OR MANUAL METHOD) MADE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18296763 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 19, 2022Detachment of Device or Device Component; Physical Resistance/Sticking; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Physical Resistance/Sticking

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT AN AXIUM COIL HAD RESISTANCE IN THE CATHETER AND PREMATURELY DETACHED. IN THE PROCESS OF PUSHING THE COIL, THE SURGEON FOUND THAT IT HAD ABNORMAL RESISTANCE. AFTER WITHDRAWING AND CHECKING THE SPRING COIL, AND FOUND THAT IT WAS AUTOMATICALLY DETACHED. AT THE SAME TIME, THERE WAS NO VIOLENT OPERATION BY THE SURGEON. IT WAS NOT IMPLANTED IN THE BODY, AND IT WAS RETURNED WHEN THE RESISTANCE WAS ABNORMAL AT THE Y VALVE. THE PUSHWIRE WAS NOT BENT OR BROKEN. THERE WAS NO OTHER FRICTION OR DIFFICULTY DURING DELIVERY/ THE PHYSICIAN DID NOT REPOSITION THE COIL OR ATTEMPT TO DETACH THE COIL. THEY DID NOT ATTEMPT TO ROTATE THE DELIVERY PUSHER DURING THE PROCEDURE. CONTINUOUS FLUSH WAS NOT ADMINISTERED DURING THE PROCEDURE. THE DEVICES WERE PREPARED ACCORDING TO THE INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE (IFU). THE PATIENT WAS BEING TREATED FOR AN UNRUPTURED, AMORPHOUS ANEURYSM IN THE OPHTHALMIC ARTERY. THE MAX DIAMETER WAS 5.67MM AND THE NECK DIAMETER WAS 3.32MM. PATIENT'S BLOOD FLOW AND VESSEL TORTUOSITY WAS NORMAL. NO SYMPTOMS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 14437776 ↗

Recalls under the same FDA submission

These recalls involve devices cleared under K081465. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.

  • Z-0874-2012 · Mar 1, 2010 · Terminated
    Axium Detachable Coil System QC-7-30-Helix The ev3 Axium Detachable Coil System is indicated for the endovascular embolization of intracranial aneurysms and other neurovascular a
  • Z-0873-2012 · Mar 1, 2010 · Terminated
    Axium Detachable Coil System QC-2-1-Helix The ev3 Axium Detachable Coil System is indicated for the endovascular embolization of intracranial aneurysms and other neurovascular ab

Other Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization devices

All Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page