Skip to content

Axium Prime Detachable Coil System APB-4-10-HX-SSRecalls & reported problems

Micro Therapeutics, Inc. · COIL APB-4-10-HX-SS V05 · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Axium Prime Detachable Coil System (70)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00847536038547), received between Aug 16, 2022 and Dec 2, 2024 — classified as 4 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Deformation” (2 reports).

2 other recalls cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K081465); they may or may not involve this specific model.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 1 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Material Deformation2
  • Separation Failure2
  • Break1
  • Detachment of Device or Device Component1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions4

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionDec 2, 2024Separation Failure; Separation Failure

    ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED THAT THE CAUSE OF THE NON-DETACHMENT WAS UNKNOWN. PRIOR TO NON-DETACHMENT, THERE WERE NO ISSUES ENCOUNTERED. THERE WAS NO PUSHWIRE DAMAGE OBSERVED AFTER REMOVAL FROM THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20822445 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 28, 2023Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED REPORTED THAT ON COIL WAS IMPLANTED BEFORE AND AFTER THE MALFUNCTIONED COIL. THE DISTAL PART OF THE COIL WAS IN THE ANEURYSM, THE PROXIMAL PART WAS IN THE PARENT VESSEL. NO SURGICAL OR ADDITIONAL DEVICE WAS NOTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16832272 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 24, 2022Separation Failure; Material Deformation; Separation Failure; Material Deformation

    ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED REPORTED THAT NO ANOMALIES WERE NOTED NEITHER DURING THE INSERTION NOR DELIVERY OF THE COIL. IT WAS OBSERVED THAT THERE WAS DAMAGE TO THE PUSHWIRE NEAR TO THE MANUAL MARKER DETACHMENT POINT. THE PATIENT WAS UNDERGOING TREATMENT FOR AN APEX LEFT OBLONG ANEURYSM LOCATED IN THE A1 SEGMENT. THE ANEURYSM SIZE WAS 5MM X 2MM. THE PATIENT'S VESSEL TORTUOSITY WAS SEVERE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 15480225 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 16, 2022Break; Material Deformation; Break; Material Deformation

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED A REPORT THAT THE PUSHER WAS KINKED/BROKEN. AFTER THE INTRAOPERATIVE CORDIS8F GUIDE CATHETER WAS IN PLACE, AND AFTER CHOOSING STRYKER SYNCHRO-14 GUIDE WIRE WITH THE ECHELON 10 MICROCATHETER IN PLACE. THE FIRST COIL WAS PUSHED THROUGH SMOOTHLY TO THE MICROCATHETER UNTIL THE ANEURYSM WAS DETACHED NORMALLY. THE SECOND COIL WAS SMOOTHLY PUSHED TO THE MICROCATHETER UNTIL THE ANEURYSM WAS DETACHED NORMALLY. WHEN THE PEIME APB-4-10-HX-SS WAS SELECTED, IT WAS SMOOTHLY PUSHED TO THE MICROCATHETER UNTIL THE ANEURYSM BUT WHEN THE PROXIMAL DETACHMENT POINT WAS DETACHED AND THE PUSH ROD WAS DIRECTLY BROKEN. WHEN DETACHING THE SECOND DETACHMENT POINT, THE PUSH ROD WAS ALSO DIRECTLY BROKEN. FINALLY, THE WIRE WAS PULLED OUT OF THE COIL BY A HEMOSTATIC FORCEPS, WHICH COULD BE DETACHED. THE COIL WAS REPLACED AND THE NEW COIL WAS SMOOTHLY PUSHED TO THE MICROCATHETER UNTIL THE ANEURYSM WAS DETACHED NORMALLY. THE DEVICE WAS PREPARED AS INDICATED IN THE IFU. A CONTINUOUS FLUSH WAS ADMINISTERED DURING THE PROCEDURE. THE DAMAGE LOCATION WAS AT THE PUSHWIRE PROXIMAL SEGMENT. THE PATIENT WAS BEING TREATED FOR AN ANEURYSM IN THE ANTERIOR COMMUNICATING ARTERY. THE ANEURYSM WAS RUPTURED. THE

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 15234721 ↗

Recalls under the same FDA submission

These recalls involve devices cleared under K081465. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.

  • Z-0874-2012 · Mar 1, 2010 · Terminated
    Axium Detachable Coil System QC-7-30-Helix The ev3 Axium Detachable Coil System is indicated for the endovascular embolization of intracranial aneurysms and other neurovascular a
  • Z-0873-2012 · Mar 1, 2010 · Terminated
    Axium Detachable Coil System QC-2-1-Helix The ev3 Axium Detachable Coil System is indicated for the endovascular embolization of intracranial aneurysms and other neurovascular ab

Other Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization devices

All Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page