Skip to content

Concerto Detachable Coil System NV-9-30-HELIXRecalls & reported problems

Micro Therapeutics, Inc. · COIL NV-9-30-HELIX V07 · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Concerto Detachable Coil System (34)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
1
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00847536044982), received between Sep 29, 2023 and Aug 13, 2026 — classified as 1 death, 3 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Physical Resistance/Sticking” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 1 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 1 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 1 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Physical Resistance/Sticking2
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Detachment of Device or Device Component1
  • No Apparent Adverse Event1
  • Separation Failure1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3
  • Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage1
  • Sepsis1

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionAug 13, 2026Detachment of Device or Device Component

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50241950 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 8, 2024Physical Resistance/Sticking; Physical Resistance/Sticking

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED A REPORT THAT THE CONCERTO WOULDN'T DEPLOY INTO THE SHEATH. ANOTHER COIL WAS OPENED AND USED. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS KNOWN AT THIS TIME.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19696257 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 3, 2024Separation Failure; Physical Resistance/Sticking; Separation Failure; Physical Resistance/Sticking

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED A REPORT THAT THE CONCERTO COIL COULD NOT BE DETACHED BY THE ID-1. IT WAS REPORTED NON-DETACHMENT OCCURRED. THE PHYSICIAN ATTEMPTED TO DETACH THE COIL WITH THE INSTANT DETACHER TWO TIMES. THE PHYSICIAN DID NOT TRY TO DETACH WITH ANOTHER INSTANT DETACHER. THE DOCTOR MENTIONED THE DELIVERY PUSHER IS STUCK IN THE DETACHER AND COULD BE DETACHED BY THE INSTANT DETACHER.  IT WAS NOTED THE PATIENT'S VESSEL TORTUOSITY WAS MINIMAL. THE REPORTED DEVICE AND ANY ACCESSORY DEVICES WERE PREPARED AS INDICATED IN THE INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE (IFU). NO PATIENT SYMPTOMS OR FURTHER COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19031559 ↗
  • DeathSep 29, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; No Apparent Adverse Event; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; No Apparent Adverse Event

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED A REPORT THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A GASTRIC VARICES PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2023. THE PATIENT WAS HOSPITALIZED ON (B)(6) 2023 FOR TIPS PLACEMENT AND BEGAN EXPERIENCING SEVERE DECLINE IN HEALTH DUE TO COMPLICATIONS FROM SEPSIS AND GI BLEED ON (B)(6) 2023. THE PATIENT'S DATE OF DEATH WAS (B)(6) 2023. THE DECISION WAS MADE BY THE PATIENT'S SON TO MOVE TOWARD PALLIATION AS OPPOSED TO ICU ADMISSION. THE EVENT DATE WAS ASSESSED AS CLOSE TO THE PROCEDURE DATE. THE SPONSOR ASSESSED THIS EVENT AS POSSIBLY RELATED TO THE PROCEDURE, NOT RELATED TO THE DEVICE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM THE SITE CLARIFYING THIS EVENT RESULTED IN PROLONGED HOSPITALIZATION. THE EVENT HAD A FATAL OUTCOME. THE PATIENT BEGAN SUFFERING FROM SEPSIS IN THE CONTEXT OF GI BLEED ON (B)(6) 2023 WHILE ALREADY ADMITTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM THE MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE (REP) REPORTING THE END DATE OF THE HOSPITALIZATION AND THE DATE OF THE FATAL OUTCOME WERE BOTH NOTED AS (B)(6) 2023, SO IT WOULD APPEAR THE SUBJECT WAS HOSPITALIZED AT THE TIME OF DEATH. THE FACILITY NAME AND LOCATION, AS WELL AS INFORMATION REGARDING AUTOPSY RECORDS ARE NOT COLLECTED IN THE ELECTRONIC CR

    Patient problems: Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Sepsis

    MAUDE report 17844476 ↗

Other Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization devices

All Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page