Concerto Detachable Coil System PV-12-30-HELIXRecalls & reported problems
Micro Therapeutics, Inc. · COIL PV-12-30-HELIX V07 · Class 2 · Implant
All models of Concerto Detachable Coil System (34)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 6
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00847536045002), received between May 17, 2024 and Aug 3, 2026 — classified as 6 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Physical Resistance/Sticking” (3 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Physical Resistance/Sticking3
- Separation Failure3
- Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions5
- Failure of Implant1
Recent adverse event reports
The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionAug 3, 2026Separation Failure
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 50114661 ↗MalfunctionJan 9, 2026Separation Failure; Physical Resistance/Sticking
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED A REPORT THAT THE TWO COILS DID NOT DEPLOY; IT WAS IMPOSSIBLE TO DETACH THEM, AND THEY WOULD NOT ADVANCE THROUGH THE CATHETER. THERE WAS INCREASED PROCEDURE TIME AND CHANGE OF EMBOLIZATION MATERIAL. NO PATIENT SYMPTOMS OR FURTHER COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT. THE DEVICE WAS NOT RETAINED. IT WAS UNKNOWN IF THERE WAS ANY ASSESSMENT FOR PRODUCT/THERAPY/PROCEDURE RELATEDNESS MADE BY THE INVESTIGATOR, SPONSOR, OR CLINICAL EVENTS COMMITTEE.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 24028374 ↗MalfunctionJun 19, 2025Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size; Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE CONCERTO COIL FAILED TO FORM A HELICAL SHAPE. A NEW MEDTRONIC DEVICE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THE REPORTED DEVICE AND ANY ACCESSORY DEVICES WERE PREPARED AS INDICATED IN THE INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE (IFU). NO PATIENT SYMPTOMS OR COMPLICATIONS WERE ASSOCIATED WITH THIS EVENT. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED STATING THAT THE CAUSE OF THE SHAPE ISSUE WAS NOT DETERMINED. THE INFORMATION IS CONFIRMED BY THE PHYSICIAN.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22294272 ↗MalfunctionMay 6, 2025Physical Resistance/Sticking; Physical Resistance/Sticking
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION REGARDING A CONCERTO COIL THAT HAD RESISTANCE DURING DELIVERY. THE PATIENT WAS UNDERGOING COIL EMBOLIZATION OF A DISTAL SOFT TISSUE LIVER VESSEL. THE ARTERY DIAMETER WAS 10MM. THERE WAS NO VESSEL CALCIFICATION OR STENOSIS NOTED. THERE WERE NO ABNORMALITIES IN RELATION TO THE PATIENT'S ANATOMY ALTHOUGH PATIENT VESSEL TORTUOSITY WAS SEVERE. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE DEVICE WAS INSPECTED AND PREPARED PER THE INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE (IFU) WITH NO ISSUE IDENTIFIED. THE COIL COULD NOT BE PUSHED OUT AT THE TARGET EMBOLIZATION SITE; THE DEVICE WAS NOTED TO BE JAMMED. THE DEVICE WAS NEVER IMPLANTED AND WAS REPLACED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE SUCCESSFULLY. PATIENT OUTCOME WAS NOTED AS ALIVE WITH NO INJURY. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED REPORTED THE COIL PUSHED OUT OF THE INTRODUCER SHEATH SMOOTHLY. THE RESISTANCE OCCURRED IN THE DISTAL END OF THE NON-MEDTRONIC MICROCATHETER. A CONTINUOUS SALINE FLUSH ADMINISTERED AND MAINTAINED AS INDICATED IN THE IFU. THERE WAS NO KINK OR OTHER DAMAGE OBSERVED TO THE COIL OR THE CATHETER AFTER REMOVAL. ANCILLARY DEVICE WAS A BOSTON SCIENTIFIC MICROCATHETER (UNSPECIFIED).
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21972110 ↗MalfunctionMar 24, 2025Separation Failure; Separation Failure
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED THAT THE EVENT OCCURRED ON 28-FEB-2025
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21679562 ↗MalfunctionMay 17, 2024Physical Resistance/Sticking; Physical Resistance/Sticking
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED A REPORT THAT THE CONCERTO COIL COULD NOT BE ADVANCED IN THE ATTEMPTS TO USE IT. THE REPORTED DEVICE AND ANY ACCESSORY DEVICES WERE PREPARED AS INDICATED IN THE INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE (IFU).
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19347737 ↗
Other Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization devices
- POD RBYPOD8-APenumbra, Inc. · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization195 reports
- CEREPAKTM MDH1Cerenovus, Inc. · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization1 recall72 reports
- Azur CX Detachable 45-750824Microvention, Inc. · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization115 reports
- Tornado G08261Cook Incorporated · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization2 recalls7 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0930CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls4 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0720CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls4 reports
- Prestige Coil System PRES0520HPKPLBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls3 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0413CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls3 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page