Skip to content

Concerto Detachable Coil System PV-2-2-3DRecalls & reported problems

Micro Therapeutics, Inc. · COIL PV-2-2-3D V05 · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Concerto Detachable Coil System (34)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00847536045071), received between Jun 16, 2025 and Mar 17, 2026 — classified as 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Physical Resistance/Sticking” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 1 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 1 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Physical Resistance/Sticking2
  • Detachment of Device or Device Component1
  • Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionMar 17, 2026Physical Resistance/Sticking

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED REPORT REGARDING CONCERTO COIL THAT HAD RESISTANCE/WAS STUCK IN THE SHEATH. FURTHERMORE, IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE COIL BECAME ENTANGLED WITH THE MICROCATHETER AND DAMAGED IT. THERE WERE NO PATIENT SYMPTOMS OR COMPLICATIONS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS EVENT. (B)(6) 2026 E1 (REP, HCP, FOR): ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED REPORTED THAT DURING PREPARATION, THE INTRODUCER SHEATH WAS NOT HELD VERTICALLY WHEN THE IMPLANT COIL WAS PULLED BACK INSIDE DURING HYDRATION; THE DEVICE WAS HELD HORIZONTALLY. THE COIL NEVER ENTERED THE MICROCATHETER OR THE PATIENT'S BODY. THE COIL WAS REPLACED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE SUCCESSFULLY. ANCILLARY DEVICE: TERUMO PROGREAT 2.4F CATHETER.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24618934 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 16, 2025Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Physical Resistance/Sticking; Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Physical Resistance/Sticking

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED A REPORT THAT WHEN THE DOCTOR PUT THE SHEATH INTO THE HUB OF THE TRUSELECT MICROCATHETER, THE CONCERTO COIL CAME OUT AND IMMEDIATELY FORMED A COIL MESH. THE REPORTED DEVICE AND ANY ACCESSORY DEVICES WERE PREPARED AS INDICATED IN THE INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE (IFU). THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22214575 ↗

Other Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization devices

All Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page