Concerto Detachable Coil System PV-6-20-3DRecalls & reported problems
Micro Therapeutics, Inc. · COIL PV-6-20-3D V05 · Class 2 · Implant
All models of Concerto Detachable Coil System (34)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 5
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00847536045163), received between May 16, 2024 and Nov 6, 2025 — classified as 5 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Physical Resistance/Sticking” (4 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Physical Resistance/Sticking4
- Break1
- Material Deformation1
- Separation Failure1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions5
Recent adverse event reports
The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionNov 6, 2025Break; Material Deformation; Physical Resistance/Sticking; Break; Material Deformation; Physical Resistance/Sticking
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED REPORTED THE COIL HAD SOME RESISTANCE DURING INSERTION IN THE MICROCATHETER. THE MICROCATHETER WAS NOT A MEDTRONIC DEVICE. WHEN THE COIL WAS WITHDRAWN, IT WAS NOTED THE THE WIRE WAS KINKED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23490194 ↗MalfunctionJun 9, 2025Separation Failure; Separation Failure
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED A REPORT THAT THERE WAS A FAILURE TO RELEASE THE SPRING AT THE TIME OF SURGERY. THE DEVICE WAS REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT AND A NEW SPRING WAS INSTALLED. THE REPORTED DEVICE AND ANY ACCESSORY DEVICES WERE PREPARED AS INDICATED IN THE INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE (IFU). NO PATIENT SYMPTOMS OR COMPLICATIONS WERE ASSOCIATED WITH THIS EVENT. IT WAS NOTED THE PATIENT'S BLOOD FLOW WAS NORMAL AND VESSEL TORTUOSITY WAS NORMAL. NO MEDICAL OR SURGICAL INTERVENTION WAS NEEDED TO PREVENT A PERMANENT IMPAIRMENT OF A FUNCTION. THE EVENT DID NOT LEAD TO OR EXTEND PATIENT HOSPITALIZATION. THERE WAS NO INJURY AS A RESULT OF THE EVENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22170367 ↗MalfunctionJan 31, 2025Physical Resistance/Sticking; Physical Resistance/Sticking
IT WAS REPORTED THAT TWO CONCERTO COILS BECAME STUCK IN THE CATHETER. THE SPECIFIC LOCATION WITHIN THE CATHETER WHERE THE RESISTANCE WAS ENCOUNTERED IS UNKNOWN, AND IT IS NOT SPECIFIED WHETHER THE CATHETER OR COILS WERE DAMAGED. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS HAVE BEEN REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED REPORTED THAT IT WAS UNKNOWN WHAT CATHETER WAS USED, BUT IT WAS NOT A MEDTRONIC DEVICE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21283084 ↗MalfunctionMay 17, 2024Physical Resistance/Sticking; Physical Resistance/Sticking
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED A REPORT THAT THE COIL COULD NOT BE ADVANCED IN ATTEMPTS TO USE IT. THE DEVICE AND ANY ACCESSORIES WERE PREPARED AS INDICATED IN THE IFU. NO PATIENT SYMPTOMS OR FURTHER COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19343958 ↗MalfunctionMay 16, 2024Physical Resistance/Sticking; Physical Resistance/Sticking
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED A REPORT THAT THE COIL COULD NOT BE ADVANCED IN ATTEMPTS TO USE IT. THE REPORTED DEVICE AND ANY ACCESSORY DEVICES PREPARED AS INDICATED IN THE INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE (IFU). IT WAS UNKNOWN IF THERE WERE ANY PATIENT SYMPTOMS OR COMPLICATIONS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS EVENT. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED THAT THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A NEW PACKAGE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19336620 ↗
Other Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization devices
- POD RBYPOD8-APenumbra, Inc. · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization195 reports
- CEREPAKTM MDH1Cerenovus, Inc. · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization1 recall72 reports
- Azur CX Detachable 45-750824Microvention, Inc. · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization115 reports
- Tornado G08261Cook Incorporated · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization2 recalls7 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0930CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls4 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0720CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls4 reports
- Prestige Coil System PRES0520HPKPLBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls3 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0413CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls3 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page