Concerto Detachable Coil System PV-8-30-3DRecalls & reported problems
Micro Therapeutics, Inc. · COIL PV-8-30-3D V05 · Class 2 · Implant
All models of Concerto Detachable Coil System (34)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 6
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00847536045187), received between Sep 25, 2023 and Sep 18, 2026 — classified as 6 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Deformation” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Material Deformation2
- Physical Resistance/Sticking2
- Separation Failure2
- Detachment of Device or Device Component1
- Failure to Advance1
- Positioning Failure1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions6
Recent adverse event reports
The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionSep 18, 2026Positioning Failure; Failure to Advance
Doctor tried to deploy the Concerto detachable coil system for a splenic bleed but there was too much resistance so he could not do so. No harm.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 50817930 ↗MalfunctionJun 30, 2026Material Deformation; Physical Resistance/Sticking
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED A REPORT THAT THE CONCERTO COIL WAS BEING USED AS PER THE IFU BUT THE COIL WAS KINKED AND GOT STUCK WITHIN THE MICROCATHETER. A NEW MEDTRONIC DEVICE WAS USED TO FINISH THE PROCEDURE. THE DEVICE ANDANY ACCESSORIES WERE PREPARED AS INDICATED IN THE INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE (IFU). THERE WERE NO PATIENT SYMPTOMS OR COMPLICATIONS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS EVENT. IT WAS NOTED THE VESSEL TORTUOSITY WAS UNKNOWN. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED REPORTED THAT NO CAUSES OR CONTRIBUTING FACTORS FOR THE KINK AND RESISTANCE WERE IDENTIFIED. A CONTINUOUS SALINE FLUSH WAS ADMINISTERED AND MAINTAINED AS INDICATED IN THE IFU. RESISTANCE LOCATION WITHIN THE CATHETER, WHETHER OR NOT THE COIL CAME OUT OF THE INTRODUCER SHEATH SMOOTHLY, AND IF THERE WAS ANY KINK/DAMAGE OBSERVED TO THE COIL OR CATHETER AFTER REMOVAL COULD NOT BE RECALLED. THERE WERE NO ISSUES THAT RESULTED IN THE DAMAGE THAT WAS FOUND. THE CATHETER WAS NOT A MEDTRONIC PRODUCT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25667987 ↗MalfunctionApr 10, 2026Material Deformation; Physical Resistance/Sticking
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED A REPORT THAT AFTER PREPPING THE DEVICE, THE TECHNICIAN WAS PUSHING THE COIL THROUGH THE CLEAR COIL CATHETER AND INTO THE 2.4FR PROGREAT CATHETER AND WAS MET WITH RESISTANCE. THEY WERE ASKED TO PULL BACK AND THEN CONTINUE TO ADVANCE THE COIL FORWARD. THIS WAS UNSUCCESSFUL AND THE COIL WAS REMOVED. UPON REMOVAL A KINK WAS NOTICED IN THE COIL PUSHER MIDDLE SEGMENT. A SECOND PV-8-30-3D WAS ATTEMPTED WITH THE SAME RESULT. A CONTINUOUS FLUSH WAS ADMINISTERED DURING THE PROCEDURE. THE REPORTED DEVICE AND ANY ACCESSORY DEVICES WERE PREPARED AS INDICATED IN THE INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE (IFU). NO PATIENT SYMPTOMS OR COMPLICATIONS WERE ASSOCIATED WITH THIS EVENT. THE PATIENT WAS UNDERGOING EMBOLIZATION FOR A LIVER RESECTION. IT WAS NOTED THE PATIENT'S BLOOD FLOW WAS NORMAL AND VESSEL TORTUOSITY WAS NORMAL. ANCILLARY DEVICES INCLUDE A 6FR TERUMO 25CM SHEATH, SOS CATHETER, AND TERUMO PROGREAT 2.4FR MICROCATHETER. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED REPORTED THAT THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING A DIRECT STICK INTO THE LIVER. BOTH COILS HAD KINKS IN THE PUSHWIRE MIDDLE SEGMENT. THERE WERE NO ISSUES THAT RESULTED IN THE DAMAGE THAT WAS FOUND. THE CAUSE OF THE EVENT WAS NOT DETERMINED
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24840992 ↗MalfunctionAug 26, 2024Separation Failure; Separation Failure
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED CLARIFIED THAT 2 COILS OF LOT B537338 HAD BEEN USED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 20063452 ↗MalfunctionJul 18, 2024Separation Failure; Separation Failure
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED CLARIFIED THAT 2 COILS OF LOT B537338 HAD BEEN USED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19771000 ↗MalfunctionSep 25, 2023Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED A REPORT THAT THE CONCERTO COIL DEPLOYED IN THE TUOHY. THE CONCERTO AND ANY ACCESSORIES WERE PREPARED AS INDICATED IN THE INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE (IFU). NO PATIENT SYMPTOMS OR FURTHER COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 17814281 ↗
Other Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization devices
- POD RBYPOD8-APenumbra, Inc. · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization195 reports
- CEREPAKTM MDH1Cerenovus, Inc. · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization1 recall72 reports
- Azur CX Detachable 45-750824Microvention, Inc. · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization115 reports
- Tornado G08261Cook Incorporated · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization2 recalls7 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0930CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls4 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0720CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls4 reports
- Prestige Coil System PRES0520HPKPLBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls3 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0413CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls3 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page