Skip to content

M SERIES BIPHASIC 40010011100103011Recalls & reported problems

Zoll Medical Corporation · Defibrillator ,MAIN,BASIC-2,BIPHASIC/AC/PC/EL/SM/RC/ENG · Class 2

Quick summary

This Zoll M Series biphasic defibrillator is a portable external cardiac defibrillator used for shock delivery and pacing. The 48 reports mostly describe units that would not power up or showed error messages during routine shift checks and biomed testing, along with failures to deliver a discharge and energy selection problems. No deaths and no injuries are reported, and no patients were involved in these events. There are no recalls naming this device, and no reports were filed in the past 12 months or the 12 months before that.

AI-generated from the FDA records on this page and checked automatically against the numbers below. Read the details before relying on it.

Adverse event reports
48
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 48 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00847946002893), received between Aug 4, 2015 and May 18, 2020 — classified as 48 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Failure to Power Up” (13 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Failure to Power Up13
  • Device Displays Incorrect Message7
  • Defibrillation/Stimulation Problem6
  • Failure to Select Signal4
  • No Display/Image3
  • Failure of Device to Self-Test2
  • Failure to Charge2
  • Failure to Discharge2

Patient problems

  • No Patient Involvement43
  • No Information3
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1

Recent adverse event reports

The 25 most recent of 48 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionMay 18, 2020Failure to Power Up; Failure to Power Up

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING A ROUTINE SHIFT CHECK BY A CLINICIAN, THE DEVICE WOULD INTERMITTENTLY NOT POWER UP. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Patient Involvement

    MAUDE report 10065658 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 4, 2020Failure to Power Up; Failure to Power Up

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING BIOMED TESTING, THE DEVICE WOULD INTERMITTENTLY NOT POWER UP. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Patient Involvement

    MAUDE report 9667319 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 23, 2020Defibrillation/Stimulation Problem; Defibrillation/Stimulation Problem

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING FUNCTIONAL TESTING, THE DEVICE DISPLAYED A "DISCHARGE FAULT" MESSAGE. COMPLAINANT DID NOT INDICATE THAT THERE WAS ANY PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Patient Involvement

    MAUDE report 9621946 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 27, 2019Failure to Power Up; Failure to Power Up

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING A ROUTINE SHIFT CHECK BY A CLINICIAN, THE DEVICE WOULD NOT POWER UP. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Patient Involvement

    MAUDE report 9527377 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 4, 2019Failure to Deliver Shock/Stimulation; Failure to Deliver Shock/Stimulation

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING A ROUTINE SHIFT CHECK BY A CLINICIAN, THE DEVICE FAILED TO DISCHARGE. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Patient Involvement

    MAUDE report 9413032 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 27, 2019Failure to Power Up; Failure to Power Up

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING BIOMED TESTING, THE DEVICE WOULD NOT POWER UP. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Patient Involvement

    MAUDE report 9384348 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 18, 2019Failure to Select Signal; Failure to Select Signal

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING BIOMED TESTING, THE DEVICE WAS UNABLE TO SELECT ENERGY LEVEL. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Patient Involvement

    MAUDE report 9208841 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 2, 2019Failure to Select Signal; Failure to Select Signal

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING BIOMED TESTING, THE DEVICE WAS UNABLE TO SELECT ENERGY LEVEL. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Patient Involvement

    MAUDE report 9145921 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 22, 2019Pacing Problem; Defibrillation/Stimulation Problem; Pacing Problem; Defibrillation/Stimulation Problem

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING A ROUTINE SHIFT CHECK BY A CLINICIAN, THE DEVICE DISPLAYED "DEFIB FAULT 72" AND "PACER FAULT 116" ERROR MESSAGES. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Patient Involvement

    MAUDE report 8920994 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 13, 2019Grounding Malfunction; Grounding Malfunction

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING BIOMED TESTING, THE DEVICE FAILED LEAKAGE CURRENT TEST. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Patient Involvement

    MAUDE report 8888938 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 30, 2019Output Problem; Output Problem

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING BIOMED TESTING, THE DEVICE'S PACER OUTPUT WAS OUT OF SPECIFICATION. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Patient Involvement

    MAUDE report 8842372 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 8, 2019Defibrillation/Stimulation Problem; Defibrillation/Stimulation Problem

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING A ROUTINE SHIFT CHECK BY A CLINICIAN, THE DEVICE DISPLAYED A "BRIDGE TEST FAILED" MESSAGE. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Patient Involvement

    MAUDE report 8769355 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 4, 2019Failure to Select Signal; Failure to Select Signal

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING BIOMED TESTING, THE DEVICE WAS UNABLE TO SELECT ENERGY LEVEL. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Patient Involvement

    MAUDE report 8667460 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 24, 2019Unable to Obtain Readings; Unable to Obtain Readings

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT WHILE ATTEMPTING TO CARDIOVERT A PATIENT (AGE & GENDER UNKNOWN) THE DEVICE DID NOT HAVE ECG SIGNAL VIA ATTACHED ELECTRODE PADS. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THE CLINICIAN OBTAINED ANOTHER DEVICE TO CONTINUE TREATING THE PATIENT. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO ADVERSE EFFECT TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 8545551 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 1, 2019Failure to Select Signal; Failure to Select Signal

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING A ROUTINE SHIFT CHECK BY A CLINICIAN, THE DEVICE WAS UNABLE TO SWITCH MODES. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Patient Involvement

    MAUDE report 8383783 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 26, 2019Energy Output Problem; Energy Output Problem

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING BIOMED TESTING, THE DEVICE WAS UNABLE TO SELECT ENERGY LEVEL. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Patient Involvement

    MAUDE report 8370480 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 31, 2019Failure to Charge; Failure to Charge

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING A ROUTINE SHIFT CHECK BY A CLINICIAN, THE DEVICE WAS UNABLE TO CHARGE. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Patient Involvement

    MAUDE report 8293245 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 31, 2018Defibrillation/Stimulation Problem; Defibrillation/Stimulation Problem

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING A ROUTINE SHIFT CHECK BY A CLINICIAN, THE DEVICE DISPLAYED "DEFIB FAULT 85" AND "DEFIB DISABLED" MESSAGES. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT DURING SUBSEQUENT BIOMED TESTING, THE DEVICE DISPLAYED "DEFIB FAULT 72" AND "PACER FAULT 116" MESSAGES. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Patient Involvement

    MAUDE report 8026359 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 5, 2018Failure to Deliver Energy; Failure to Deliver Energy

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING A ROUTINE SHIFT CHECK BY A CLINICIAN, THE DEVICE FAILED TO DISCHARGE. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Patient Involvement

    MAUDE report 7938350 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 24, 2018Failure to Power Up; Failure to Power Up

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING A ROUTINE SHIFT CHECK BY A CLINICIAN, THE DEVICE WOULD NOT POWER UP. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Patient Involvement

    MAUDE report 7902545 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 7, 2018Unexpected Shutdown; Unexpected Shutdown

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT WHILE ATTEMPTING TO TREAT A PATIENT, THE DEVICE INAPPROPRIATELY SHUT DOWN. COMPLAINANT DID NOT INDICATE THAT THERE WAS ANY ADVERSE EFFECT TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Information

    MAUDE report 7856945 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 7, 2018Defibrillation/Stimulation Problem; Defibrillation/Stimulation Problem

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING ROUTINE SHIFT CHECK BY A CLINICIAN, THE DEVICE WOULD NOT GO INTO SYNC MODE. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Patient Involvement

    MAUDE report 7855999 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 13, 2018Failure of Device to Self-Test; Failure of Device to Self-Test

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING A ROUTINE SHIFT CHECK BY A CLINICIAN, THE DEVICE FAILED SELF-TEST FOR DEFIB FUNCTION. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Patient Involvement

    MAUDE report 7776360 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 10, 2018Defibrillation/Stimulation Problem; Defibrillation/Stimulation Problem

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING A ROUTINE SHIFT CHECK BY A CLINICIAN, THE DEVICE DISPLAYED A "DEFIB FAULT 72" MESSAGE. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Patient Involvement

    MAUDE report 7773011 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 19, 2018Device Displays Incorrect Message; Device Displays Incorrect Message

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING A ROUTINE SHIFT CHECK BY A CLINICIAN, THE DEVICE DISPLAYED "DEFIB DISABLED", "PACER DISABLED" AND "PACER FAULT 116" MESSAGES. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Patient Involvement

    MAUDE report 7615730 ↗

Other PACEMAKER, CARDIAC, EXTERNAL TRANSCUTANEOUS (NON-INVASIVE) devices

All PACEMAKER, CARDIAC, EXTERNAL TRANSCUTANEOUS (NON-INVASIVE) devices →

Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.