Skip to content

M SERIES BIPHASIC 60010511100123010Recalls & reported problems

Zoll Medical Corporation · Defibrillator ,MAIN,ACLS/MNL-1, 3/5LEAD,SPO2,NIBP,BIPHASIC,AC,PC,EL,RC,SM,CM,ENG,REFURB · Class 2

All models of M SERIES BIPHASIC (59)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00847946012069), received between May 24, 2017 and Jan 9, 2020 — classified as 3 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Operational Issue” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Device Operational Issue1
  • Failure to Select Signal1
  • Pacing Problem1

Patient problems

  • No Patient Involvement2
  • No Information1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionJan 9, 2020Failure to Select Signal; Failure to Select Signal

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING BIOMED TESTING, THE DEVICE WAS INTERMITTENTLY UNABLE TO SELECT ENERGY LEVEL. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Patient Involvement

    MAUDE report 9569286 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 6, 2018Pacing Problem; Pacing Problem

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING BIOMED TESTING THE DEVICE WAS UNABLE TO PACE. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Patient Involvement

    MAUDE report 7245373 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 24, 2017Device Operational Issue; Device Operational Issue

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT WHILE ATTEMPTING TO TREAT A PATIENT (AGE & GENDER UNKNOWN) THE DEVICE WAS UNABLE TO ENTER DEFIB MODE. COMPLAINANT DID NOT INDICATE THAT THERE WAS ANY ADVERSE EFFECT TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Information

    MAUDE report 6589263 ↗

Other ELECTROCARDIOGRAPH devices

All ELECTROCARDIOGRAPH devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page