Skip to content

M SERIES BIPHASIC 60010011100103010Recalls & reported problems

Zoll Medical Corporation · Defibrillator ,MAIN, BASIC-4, 3/5LEAD, BIPHASIC, ENG, REFURB · Class 2

All models of M SERIES BIPHASIC (59)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
5
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00847946013097), received between Aug 19, 2015 and Sep 17, 2018 — classified as 5 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Failure to Power Up” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Failure to Power Up2
  • Failure of Device to Self-Test1
  • Failure to Capture1
  • Failure to Charge1

Patient problems

  • No Patient Involvement4
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1

Recent adverse event reports

The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionSep 17, 2018Failure to Capture; Failure to Capture

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT WHILE ATTEMPTING TO PACE A MALE PATIENT (AGE UNKNOWN), THE DEVICE FAILED TO CAPTURE THE PATIENT'S HEART RHYTHM. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THE CLINICIAN OBTAINED ANOTHER DEVICE TO CONTINUE TREATING THE PATIENT. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO ADVERSE EFFECT TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION. PLEASE REFERENCE MEDWATCH REPORT 1220908-2018-02582 FOR A SIMILAR EVENT REPORTED ON THE SAME PATIENT.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 7882611 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 31, 2017Failure to Charge; Failure to Charge

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT THE DEFIB WAS UNABLE TO CHARGE. COMPLAINANT DID NOT INDICATE THAT THERE WAS ANY PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Patient Involvement

    MAUDE report 6989975 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 3, 2017Failure to Power Up; Failure to Power Up

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING BIOMED TESTING, THE DEVICE WOULD NOT POWER UP. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Patient Involvement

    MAUDE report 6764828 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 16, 2017Failure of Device to Self-Test; Failure of Device to Self-Test

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING A ROUTINE SHIFT CHECK BY A CLINICIAN, THE DEVICE FAILED SELF TEST. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Patient Involvement

    MAUDE report 6569496 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 19, 2015Failure to Power Up

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING A ROUTINE SHIFT CHECK BY A CLINICIAN, THE DEVICE WOULD INTERMITTENTLY NOT POWER UP. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Patient Involvement

    MAUDE report 5035713 ↗

Other ELECTROCARDIOGRAPH devices

All ELECTROCARDIOGRAPH devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page