Skip to content

RESTORIS 180604Recalls & reported problems

Mako Surgical Corp. · MCK Onlay Tibia Baseplate · Class 2 · Implant

Adverse event reports
6
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
6
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00848486000707), received between Dec 11, 2020 and Sep 12, 2025 — classified as 6 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Osseointegration Problem” (3 reports).

5 other recalls cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K082172, K090763, K150307, K220930, K242831); they may or may not involve this specific model.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 1 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 1 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Osseointegration Problem3
  • Fracture2
  • Break1
  • Loss of Osseointegration1

Patient problems

  • Ambulation or Postural Difficulties3
  • Inadequate Osseointegration2
  • Insufficient Information2
  • Pain2

Recent adverse event reports

The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjurySep 12, 2025Fracture; Fracture

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT'S LEFT MEDIAL UNI KNEE WAS REVISED DUE TO THE TIBIAL BASEPLATE BREAKING IN HALF (NO CAUSE OR CONTRIBUTOR TO THE BREAKAGE WAS REPORTED TO THE REP). THE INSERT BECAME DAMAGED/ WARPED AS A RESULT. THE PATIENT WAS CONVERTED TO A TKA WITH STEM AND AUGMENTS. REP CONFIRMED THAT NO FURTHER INFORMATION WILL BE RELEASED BY THE HOSPITAL OR SURGEON.

    Patient problems: Ambulation or Postural Difficulties; Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 23036275 ↗
  • InjuryMar 4, 2024Fracture; Fracture

    MAKO UNI TIBIA BASEPLATE WAS BROKE IN HALF. POLY WAS STILL INTACT. THE UNI WAS REVISED INTO A TKA. NOTICED VIA X-RAY. ORIGINAL SURGERY WAS AROUND 7-8 YEARS AGO. UPDATE 08/FEBRUARY/2024 WG: LEFT MEDIAL KNEE. SALES MANAGER CONFIRMED THERE WERE NO ALLEGATIONS AGAINST THE REVISED INSERT.

    Patient problems: Ambulation or Postural Difficulties; Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 18824584 ↗
  • InjuryMay 25, 2023Loss of Osseointegration; Osseointegration Problem; Loss of Osseointegration; Osseointegration Problem

    REVISION FROM MEDIAL UNI TO TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT. THE TIBIAL IMPLANT WAS LOOSE WITH MINIMAL BONDING TO THE CEMENT MANTLE. FEMUR WAS WELL FIXATED. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH MEDIAL KNEE PAIN. LEFT KNEE.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration; Pain

    MAUDE report 17000851 ↗
  • InjuryJun 30, 2022Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem

    RESTORIS PKA WAS REVISED AFTER A PATIENT FALL AND SUBSEQUENT LOOSENING OF THE TIBIAL COMPONENT. LEFT SIDE.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration

    MAUDE report 14878874 ↗
  • InjuryMar 9, 2021Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem

    PATIENT HAD A REVISION. PATIENT HAD A LEFT MAKO PARTIAL KNEE (RESTORIS) INSITU APPROXIMATELY 12 MONTHS OLD. THEY PRESENTED WITH MEDIAL PAIN, MRI SHOWED MEDIAL TIBIAL LOOSENING. INTRA OP TIBIAL BASEPLATE LIFTED OFF WITH NO SIGN OF CEMENT INTERDIGITATION. PRIMARY TRIATHLON KNEE IMPLANTED.

    Patient problems: Pain

    MAUDE report 11447284 ↗
  • InjuryDec 11, 2020Break; Break

    MAKO BASEPLATE WAS REVISED AND WAS BROKEN IN 2 PIECES.

    Patient problems: Ambulation or Postural Difficulties

    MAUDE report 10992246 ↗

Recalls under the same FDA submission

These recalls involve devices cleared under K082172, K090763, K150307, K220930, K242831. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.

  • Z-1385-2023 · Mar 10, 2023 · Open, Classified
    stryker MAKO RESTORIS MCK BASEPLATE TRIAL (SIZE 5 RM/LL), REF 170615, intended for use in a Partial Knee Arthroplasty surgical procedure
  • Z-1386-2023 · Mar 10, 2023 · Open, Classified
    stryker MAKO RESTORIS MCK BASEPLATE TRIAL (SIZE 6 RM/LL), REF 170616, intended for use in a Partial Knee Arthroplasty surgical procedure
  • Z-2051-2018 · Jan 19, 2018 · Terminated
    Restoris MCK Onlay Insert Extractor.
  • Z-1031-2016 · Jan 15, 2016 · Terminated
    Restoris Multicompartmental Knee (MCK) System RESTORIS MCK is indicated for single or multi-compartmental knee replacement used in conjunction with RIO.
  • Z-1132-2014 · Jan 9, 2014 · Terminated
    Restoris Multicompartmental Knee (MCK) System is an implant system designed to be used with MAKO's Robotic Arm Interactive Orthopedic System (RIO). It is composed of a unicompartme

Other PROSTHESIS, KNEE, FEMOROTIBIAL, NON-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER devices

All PROSTHESIS, KNEE, FEMOROTIBIAL, NON-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER devices →

Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.