Skip to content

RESTORIS 180616Recalls & reported problems

Mako Surgical Corp. · MCK Onlay Tibia Baseplate · Class 2 · Implant

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
4
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00848486000790), received between Aug 29, 2019 and Nov 19, 2024 — classified as 4 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Insufficient Device Problem Information” (3 reports).

5 other recalls cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K082172, K090763, K150307, K220930, K242831); they may or may not involve this specific model.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 1 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Insufficient Device Problem Information3
  • Osseointegration Problem1

Patient problems

  • Pain3
  • Inadequate Osseointegration1
  • Injury1

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryNov 19, 2024Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem

    REVISION OF RIGHT PARTIAL MEDIAL UNI TO RIGHT TOTAL KNEE. ORIGINAL SURGERY WAS RIGHT PARTIAL MEDIAL UNICOMPARTMENTAL KNEE DONE IN (B)(6) 2014 (EXACT DATE UNKNOWN). REASON FOR REVISION WAS TIBIAL COMPONENT WAS LOOSE. ALL THREE COMPONENTS (MCK FEMUR, MCK TIBIA, AND POLY) WERE REVISED AND REPLACED WITH TOTAL KNEE IMPLANTS.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration

    MAUDE report 20727578 ↗
  • InjuryMar 5, 2020Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    THIS PI IS FOR THE IMPLANTS USED IN PATIENT 3 OF 3. (B)(6) MALE, SURGERY (B)(6) 2019. RIGHT KNEE. AS REPORTED BY SURGEON: ATTACHED ARE XRAYS OF THREE PATIENTS I PREVIOUSLY DISCUSSED. ALL HAVE CONCERNING RADIOLUCENCIES UNDERNEATH THE TIBIAL BASEPLATE THAT APPEARED SEVERAL MONTHS POST OP. THUS FAR, NONE HAVE REQUIRED REVISION BUT ALL HAVE SOME DEGREE OF PAIN (MOSTLY MEDIAL). AGAIN I NEVER SAW THIS PRIOR THE MICS TRANSITION. LET ME KNOW YOUR THOUGHTS AND IF ANY OTHER SURGEONS HAVE SEEN THIS ISSUE. MORE RECENTLY, I HAVE BEEN USING A 2MM DRILL TO PERFORATE THE SCLEROTIC TIBIAL SURFACE TO PROMOTE BETTER CEMENT INTERDIGITATION AND MY RESULTS SEEM TO BE MUCH BETTER. CASE TYPE: PKA 3.0.

    Patient problems: Pain

    MAUDE report 9794039 ↗
  • InjuryMar 5, 2020Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    THIS PI IS FOR THE IMPLANTS USED IN PATIENT 2 OF 3. (B)(6) YO FEMALE, SURGERY (B)(6) 2019. AS REPORTED BY SURGEON: ATTACHED ARE XRAYS OF THREE PATIENTS I PREVIOUSLY DISCUSSED. ALL HAVE CONCERNING RADIOLUCENCIES UNDERNEATH THE TIBIAL BASEPLATE THAT APPEARED SEVERAL MONTHS POST OP. THUS FAR, NONE HAVE REQUIRED REVISION BUT ALL HAVE SOME DEGREE OF PAIN (MOSTLY MEDIAL). AGAIN I NEVER SAW THIS PRIOR THE MICS TRANSITION. LET ME KNOW YOUR THOUGHTS AND IF ANY OTHER SURGEONS HAVE SEEN THIS ISSUE. MORE RECENTLY, I HAVE BEEN USING A 2MM DRILL TO PERFORATE THE SCLEROTIC TIBIAL SURFACE TO PROMOTE BETTER CEMENT INTERDIGITATION AND MY RESULTS SEEM TO BE MUCH BETTER. CASE TYPE: PKA 3.0.

    Patient problems: Pain

    MAUDE report 9794038 ↗
  • InjuryAug 29, 2019Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    REVISION OF A RESTORIS MEDIAL UNICOMPARTMENT KNEE TO A TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT. PATIENT HAD A REVISION UNDERTAKEN DUE TO PAIN UPON WALKING. FEMORAL COMPONENT APPEARED WELL FIXED, TIBIAL COMPONENT WAS EASILY MOVED DURING THE REVISION. ONCE IMPLANTS WERE REMOVED THE TIBIAL IMPLANT SHOWED NO VISIBLE SIGNS OF BONDING TO THE CEMENT NOR THE BONE. FEMUR WAS WELL FIXED. A TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT WAS COMPLETED SATISFACTORILY USING A TRIATHLON PS IMPLANT, WITHOUT DELAY.

    Patient problems: Injury; Pain

    MAUDE report 8947010 ↗

Recalls under the same FDA submission

These recalls involve devices cleared under K082172, K090763, K150307, K220930, K242831. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.

  • Z-1386-2023 · Mar 10, 2023 · Open, Classified
    stryker MAKO RESTORIS MCK BASEPLATE TRIAL (SIZE 6 RM/LL), REF 170616, intended for use in a Partial Knee Arthroplasty surgical procedure
  • Z-1385-2023 · Mar 10, 2023 · Open, Classified
    stryker MAKO RESTORIS MCK BASEPLATE TRIAL (SIZE 5 RM/LL), REF 170615, intended for use in a Partial Knee Arthroplasty surgical procedure
  • Z-2051-2018 · Jan 19, 2018 · Terminated
    Restoris MCK Onlay Insert Extractor.
  • Z-1031-2016 · Jan 15, 2016 · Terminated
    Restoris Multicompartmental Knee (MCK) System RESTORIS MCK is indicated for single or multi-compartmental knee replacement used in conjunction with RIO.
  • Z-1132-2014 · Jan 9, 2014 · Terminated
    Restoris Multicompartmental Knee (MCK) System is an implant system designed to be used with MAKO's Robotic Arm Interactive Orthopedic System (RIO). It is composed of a unicompartme

Other PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLO/FEMORAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER devices

All PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLO/FEMORAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER devices →

Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.