Mako 180733-1Recalls & reported problems
Mako Surgical Corp. · Tibial Bearing Insert · Class 2 · Implant
- Adverse event reports
- 3
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 2
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00848486016449), received between Sep 14, 2017 and Aug 10, 2026 — classified as 2 injuries, 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Operates Differently Than Expected” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
- Device Operates Differently Than Expected1
- Fracture1
- Material Deformation1
Patient problems
- Arthritis1
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
- Unspecified Infection1
Recent adverse event reports
The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryAug 10, 2026Fracture
Performing a revision of a uni knee to total knee procedure. Retrieval and removal of old tibia implant revealed a broken portion of the posterior polyethylene insert. Previous knee a mako PKA performed on (b)(6) 2019. Revision was for advancement of arthritis and it was unknown there was any implant issue until the implant was removed. Total knee was implanted with no issues.
Patient problems: Arthritis
MAUDE report 50195937 ↗InjuryOct 27, 2021Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
DR. PERFORMED AN I&D WITH POLY SWAP OF A RIGHT MEDIAL KNEE ORIGINALLY DONE (B)(6) 2021 DUE TO INFECTION.
Patient problems: Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 12705398 ↗MalfunctionSep 14, 2017Device Operates Differently Than Expected; Material Deformation; Device Operates Differently Than Expected; Material Deformation
SURGEON ATTEMPTED TO PUT THE POLY IN AND IT WOULD NOT LOCK. AFTER EXAMINING IT, THE BASE OF IT WAS NOT FLAT AND THEREFORE WOULDN'T LOCK INTO THE BASE PLATE. SURGICAL DELAY OF 5 TO 7 MINUTES. CASE TYPE LEFT PKA.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 6865529 ↗
Other PROSTHESIS, KNEE, FEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, UNICOMPARTMENTAL/UNICONDYLAR, UNCEMENTED, POROUS-COATED, METAL/POLYMER devices
- ENGAGE 1-10003-410Smith & Nephew, Inc. · Prosthesis, knee, femorotibial, unicompartmental/unicondylar, uncemented, porous-coated, metal/polymer1 recall10 reports
- ENGAGE 1-10012-500Smith & Nephew, Inc. · Prosthesis, knee, femorotibial, unicompartmental/unicondylar, uncemented, porous-coated, metal/polymer1 recall6 reports
- ENGAGE 1-10003-600Smith & Nephew, Inc. · Prosthesis, knee, femorotibial, unicompartmental/unicondylar, uncemented, porous-coated, metal/polymer1 recall4 reports
- ENGAGE 1-10011-200Smith & Nephew, Inc. · Prosthesis, knee, femorotibial, unicompartmental/unicondylar, uncemented, porous-coated, metal/polymer1 recall3 reports
- ENGAGE 1-10012-350Smith & Nephew, Inc. · Prosthesis, knee, femorotibial, unicompartmental/unicondylar, uncemented, porous-coated, metal/polymer1 recall3 reports
- ENGAGE 1-10003-500Smith & Nephew, Inc. · Prosthesis, knee, femorotibial, unicompartmental/unicondylar, uncemented, porous-coated, metal/polymer1 recall3 reports
- ENGAGE 1-10012-200Smith & Nephew, Inc. · Prosthesis, knee, femorotibial, unicompartmental/unicondylar, uncemented, porous-coated, metal/polymer1 recall2 reports
- ENGAGE 1-10003-310Smith & Nephew, Inc. · Prosthesis, knee, femorotibial, unicompartmental/unicondylar, uncemented, porous-coated, metal/polymer1 recall2 reports
Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.