RESTORIS, RIO 206270Recalls & reported problems
Mako Surgical Corp. · SHELL IMPACTION PLATFORM · Class 2
Quick summary
This Mako Surgical Restoris shell impaction platform is a robotic surgical instrument used to press hip cup implants into place during total hip replacement. The 54 reports mostly describe parts breaking or fracturing during impaction, springs or caps popping out, and instruments that would not lock or release properly, sometimes causing delays of up to 35 minutes in surgery. No deaths or injuries were reported, and no recalls name this device.
AI-generated from the FDA records on this page and checked automatically against the numbers below. Read the details before relying on it.
- Adverse event reports
- 54
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 54 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00848486022082), received between Jun 4, 2018 and Nov 26, 2019 — classified as 54 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (35 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Break35
- Non Reproducible Results24
- Fracture18
- Material Integrity Problem12
- Mechanical Problem7
- Detachment of Device or Device Component2
- Difficult to Insert2
- Separation Failure1
Patient problems
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient54
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient3
Recent adverse event reports
The 25 most recent of 54 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionNov 26, 2019Fracture; Separation Failure; Fracture; Separation Failure
IMPACTION CAP/PLATE WOULD NOT DISENGAGE FROM THE IMPACTOR AFTER IMPACTION. PIECES ARE STILL TOGETHER AND IT APPEARS THE CAP DISENGAGE IS BROKEN CASE TYPE: THA.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 9378969 ↗MalfunctionNov 26, 2019Fracture; Difficult to Insert; Fracture; Difficult to Insert
DURING IMPACTION, THE OFFSET IMPACTOR BROKE AT THE ATTACHMENT AREA FOR THE IMPACTION PAD. WHEN WE TRIED TO PUT THE IMPACTION PAD ON ANOTHER IMPACTOR IT WOULD NOT FIT OR LOCK ON. THE IMPACTOR SHAFT COMPLAINT WAS RECORDED IN (B)(4) CASE TYPE: THA SURGICAL DELAY; X <= 15 MINUTES.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 9378966 ↗MalfunctionNov 26, 2019Fracture; Fracture
IMPACTION PLATFORM BROKE WHILE IMPACTING. CASE TYPE: THA.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 9378235 ↗MalfunctionNov 26, 2019Fracture; Fracture
MAKO TOTAL HIP CUP IMPACTOR PAD BROKEN ON REMOVAL FROM END EFFECTOR/IMPACTOR POST CUP IMPACTION. CUP IMPACTION COMPLETED BEFORE ISSUE AND NO REPLACEMENT NEEDED. MALE PATIENT UNDERGOING TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 9378109 ↗MalfunctionNov 15, 2019Break; Fracture; Material Integrity Problem; Break; Fracture; Material Integrity Problem
PRONG ON IMPACTION PLATFORM BROKE. CASE TYPE: THA.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 9327525 ↗MalfunctionNov 8, 2019Mechanical Problem; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Mechanical Problem; Detachment of Device or Device Component
SPRING INSIDE IMPACTION PLATFORM POPPED OUT DURING IMPACTION. CASE TYPE: THA.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 9295405 ↗MalfunctionOct 1, 2019Material Integrity Problem; Material Integrity Problem
INLINE OFFSET IMPACTOR FRACTURED WHILE SURGEON WAS IMPACTING CUP. IMPACTOR PLATE AND HIP END EFFECTOR WERE DAMAGED AS WELL, I HAD REPLACEMENT SET OF INSTRUMENTS TO OPEN ONTO THE STERILE FIELD, SURGEON HAD DIFFICULTY REMOVING BROKEN INSTRUMENTS OFF OF THE ROBOT, WHICH ADDED TO THE DELAY IN SURGERY. CASE TYPE: THA. SURGICAL DELAY: 35 MINUTES. THIS COMPLAINT IS FOR 206270 SHELL IMPACTION PLATFORM. ASSOCIATED COMPLAINTS FROM THE SAME SURGERY INCLUDE: PI 2198767, PI 2198777 AND PI 2198959. UPDATE: "YES, THE PATIENT WAS UNDER ANESTHESIA."
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 9141694 ↗MalfunctionOct 1, 2019Fracture; Fracture
IMPACTOR PLATE FRACTURED WHILE SURGEON WAS IMPACTING CUP. INLINE OFFSET IMPACTOR AND HIP END EFFECTOR WERE DAMAGED AS WELL, I HAD REPLACEMENT SET OF INSTRUMENTS TO OPEN ONTO THE STERILE FIELD, SURGEON HAD DIFFICULTY REMOVING BROKEN INSTRUMENTS OFF OF THE ROBOT, WHICH ADDED TO THE DELAY IN SURGERY. CASE TYPE: THA. SURGICAL DELAY: 35 MINUTES. THIS COMPLAINT IS FOR THE 206270 SHELL IMPACTION PLATFORM. ASSOCIATED COMPLAINTS FROM THE SAME SURGERY INCLUDE: (B)(4).
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 9141325 ↗MalfunctionSep 24, 2019Break; Fracture; Break; Fracture
IMPATOR PLATE WILL NOT LOCK INTO PLACE. CASE TYPE: THA. PER INTAKE RESPONSE: 9/9/2019 THA WITH BROKEN IMPACTOR PLATE.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient; No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 9110812 ↗MalfunctionSep 18, 2019Break; Fracture; Break; Fracture
AFTER IMPACTION THE STRIKE PLATE BROKE INTO A FEW PIECES. THIS RESULTED IN NOT BEING ABLE TO DISASSEMBLE REMAINING PIECE OF THE STRIKE PLATE, THE IN-LINE OFFSET IMPACTOR (209830-LOT UNKNOWN), AND THE END EFFECTOR (206967, LOT: 19021214). THE INLINE OFFSET MIGHT BE BENT WHICH MIGHT BE CAUSING THE INABILITY TO PASS THROUGH THE STRIKE PLATE. BUT THE END EFFECTOR SHOULD NOT BE DAMAGED IN ANY CAPACITY. HOWEVER ALL THREE PIECES ARE NO LONGER EFFECTIVE. CASE TYPE: THA.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 9081447 ↗MalfunctionSep 17, 2019Break; Fracture; Break; Fracture
IMPACTION PLATFORM BROKE DURING CUP IMPACTION. CASE TYPE: THA.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 9078024 ↗MalfunctionSep 9, 2019Break; Non Reproducible Results; Break; Non Reproducible Results
IMPACTION PLATFORM BROKE IN HALF WHILE SURGEON WAS IMPACTING IMPLANT. CASE TYPE: THA. SURGICAL DELAY: 15 MINUTES.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 8975124 ↗MalfunctionSep 5, 2019Break; Non Reproducible Results; Break; Non Reproducible Results
WENT TO IMPACT CUP AND MAKO SHELL IMPACTOR BROKE. HIGH VOLUME ACCOUNT NEEDING REPLACEMENT ASAP. CASE TYPE: THA. 15 MINUTES.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 8966873 ↗MalfunctionAug 29, 2019Break; Difficult to Insert; Break; Difficult to Insert
IMPLACTION PLATFORM STRIKE PLATE WILL NOT ENGAGE WITH THE CUP IMPACTOR.. THE ENGAGING BUTTON APPEARS TO BE BROKEN NOT ALLOWING THE STRIKE PLATE TO BE SEATED ON THE IMPACTOR. CASE TYPE: THA. SURGICAL DELAY: =15 MINUTES.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 8946468 ↗MalfunctionAug 13, 2019Material Integrity Problem; Non Reproducible Results; Material Integrity Problem; Non Reproducible Results
DURING A MAKO THA PROCEDURE, CUP IMPACTION WAS SUCCESSFUL AND COMPLETED. UPON DISMANTLING THE MAKO CUP INSERTER, THE "IMPACTION PLATFORM" WAS CRACKED AND FELL APART UPON REMOVAL FROM THE IMPACTOR SHAFT. UPDATE: WAS THE PATIENT UNDER ANESTHESIA WHEN THE EVENT OCCURRED? YES. 2. WERE ANY DEBRIS/COMPONENTS LEFT INSIDE OF THE PATIENT? NO DEBRIS WAS LEFT INSIDE THE PATIENT, SURGEON WAS HAPPY THAT ALL DEBRIS/ PARTS OF THE BROKEN COMPONENT WERE ACCOUNTED FOR. 3. WERE ANY COMPONENTS OF THE DEVICE MISSING OR DISASSEMBLED WHEN THE ISSUE OCCURRED? NO, THE COMPONENT WAS COMPLETE WHEN THE ISSUE OCCURRED.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 8889030 ↗MalfunctionAug 2, 2019Break; Non Reproducible Results; Break; Non Reproducible Results
IMPACTION PLATFORM BROKE DURING IMPACTION. CASE TYPE: THA
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 8858157 ↗MalfunctionJul 23, 2019Break; Non Reproducible Results; Break; Non Reproducible Results
TODAY WHILE DOING A MAKO THA, WE NOTICED THE IMPACTION PLATFORM WAS BROKEN AFTER DR. (B)(6) HAD FINISHED IMPACTING THE CUP. THE CASE WAS COMPLETED ROBOTICALLY WITHOUT ISSUE. CASE TYPE: THA.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 8817066 ↗MalfunctionJul 22, 2019Break; Non Reproducible Results; Break; Non Reproducible Results
SURGEON HIT THE CUP IMPACTOR ON THE SIDE OF THE PLATE BREAKING THE PLATE AND BENDING THE IMPACTOR. CASE TYPE: THA.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 8814502 ↗MalfunctionJul 16, 2019Break; Fracture; Break; Fracture
WE HAD AN IMPACTION PLATFORM SHATTER UPON CUP IMPACTION TODAY. CASE TYPE: TKA.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 8795204 ↗MalfunctionJul 3, 2019Break; Fracture; Break; Fracture
IMPACTING BLOCK BROKE DURING IMPACTION, BENDING OFFSET IMPACTOR IN PROCESS. CASE TYPE: THA.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient; No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 8760052 ↗MalfunctionJul 2, 2019Break; Break
IMPACTION PLATFORM BROKE DURING IMPACTING . CASE TYPE: THA.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 8754370 ↗MalfunctionJun 26, 2019Fracture; Non Reproducible Results; Fracture; Non Reproducible Results
PLATFORM BROKE WHILE IMPACTING CUP. CASE TYPE: THA. SURGICAL DELAY: 5 MINUTES.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 8736873 ↗MalfunctionJun 26, 2019Fracture; Fracture
BROKE DURING IMPACTION. CASE TYPE: THA.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 8736797 ↗MalfunctionMay 31, 2019Break; Break
THE END OF THE MAKO STRAIGHT CUP IMPACTOR BROKE OFF INSIDE OF THE IMPACTION PLATFORM. CASE TYPE: THA. UPDATE: "YES THE IMPACTOR BROKE DURING IMPACTION".
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient; No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 8657972 ↗MalfunctionMay 24, 2019Material Integrity Problem; Non Reproducible Results; Material Integrity Problem; Non Reproducible Results
DURING IMPACTION, IMPACTION PLATFORM AND THE BACK ON THE INLINE-OFFSET IMPACTION BROKE. THE PLATFORM CRACKED IN HALF WHILE TAKING A PIECE OF THE BACK OF THE IMPACTOR. IMPACTION WAS STILL COMPLETED WITH THE ROBOT WITH NO PATIENT HARM AND OUTCOMES WERE NOT EFFECTED. CASE TYPE: THA. UPDATE: "NO DEBRIS/COMPONENTS WERE LEFT INSIDE OF THE PATIENT. NO COMPONENTS OF THE DEVICE WERE MISSING OR DISASSEMBLED WHEN THE ISSUE OCCURRED."
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 8642196 ↗
Other Orthopedic stereotaxic instrument devices
- REAL INTELLIGENCE ROB10024Smith & Nephew, Inc. · Orthopedic stereotaxic instrument1 recall924 reports
- NA 209063Mako Surgical Corp. · Orthopedic stereotaxic instrument2 recalls602 reports
- RESTORIS, RIO 212760Mako Surgical Corp. · Orthopedic stereotaxic instrument605 reports
- REAL INTELLIGENCE ROB10013Smith & Nephew, Inc. · Orthopedic stereotaxic instrument1 recall528 reports
- VELYS 4515-70-105Depuy (Ireland) · Orthopedic stereotaxic instrument578 reports
- VELYS 4515-70-106Depuy (Ireland) · Orthopedic stereotaxic instrument564 reports
- NA 209999Mako Surgical Corp. · Orthopedic stereotaxic instrument522 reports
- Mazor X System TPL0059-06Mazor Robotics Ltd · Orthopedic Stereotaxic Instrument2 recalls2 deaths392 reports
Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.