LOBO LOBO-7Recalls & reported problems
Okami Medical, Inc. · Peripheral Vascular Occluder · Class 2 · Implant
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 3
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 2
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00850008222030), received between Jul 24, 2023 and Sep 11, 2026 — classified as 2 injuries, 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Migration” (3 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Migration3
Patient problems
- Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque2
- Hypervolemia2
- Inadequate Pain Relief2
- Necrosis2
- Pain2
- Pulmonary Edema2
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
Recent adverse event reports
The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionSep 11, 2026Migration
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 50742873 ↗InjuryJul 24, 2023Migration; Migration
PATIENT WAS TREATED FOR A SPLENIC ARTERY ANEURYSM MEASURING 2.5 - 3 CM. A LOBO-7 DEVICE WAS DEPLOYED IN THE SPLENIC ARTERY DISTAL TO THE ANEURYSM AND MIGRATED INTO AN UPPER POLE BRANCH OF THE SPLENIC ARTERY. THE DEVICE COULD NOT BE RETRIEVED WITH A SNARE AND THE PHYSICIAN ELECTED TO LEAVE IT IN PLACE. THE ANEURYSM WAS SUCCESSFULLY TREATED WITH LOBO-9 AND EMBOLIC COILS. THE SPLEEN WAS PARTIALLY INFARCTED, BUT NO LONG-TERM EFFECTS TO SPLENIC FUNCTION ARE ANTICIPATED BY THE PHYSICIAN. PATIENT WAS DISCHARGED FOLLOWING THE PROCEDURE WITH PAIN MEDICATION. THE PATIENT RETURNED TO THE HOSPITAL AND WAS ADMITTED FOR PAIN MANAGEMENT. DURING HOSPITALIZATION, THE PATIENT WAS TREATED FOR PAIN AND FLUID OVERLOAD (INCLUDING PULMONARY EDEMA), AND WAS SUBSEQUENTLY DISCHARGED.
Patient problems: Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque; Hypervolemia; Inadequate Pain Relief; Necrosis; Pain; Pulmonary Edema
MAUDE report 17376052 ↗InjuryJul 24, 2023Migration; Migration
PATIENT WAS TREATED FOR A SPLENIC ARTERY ANEURYSM MEASURING 2.5 - 3 CM. A LOBO-7 DEVICE WAS DEPLOYED IN THE SPLENIC ARTERY DISTAL TO THE ANEURYSM AND MIGRATED INTO AN UPPER POLE BRANCH OF THE SPLENIC ARTERY. THE DEVICE COULD NOT BE RETRIEVED WITH A SNARE AND THE PHYSICIAN ELECTED TO LEAVE IT IN PLACE. THE ANEURYSM WAS SUCCESSFULLY TREATED WITH LOBO-9 AND EMBOLIC COILS. THE SPLEEN WAS PARTIALLY INFARCTED, BUT NO LONG-TERM EFFECTS TO SPLENIC FUNCTION ARE ANTICIPATED BY THE PHYSICIAN. PATIENT WAS DISCHARGED FOLLOWING THE PROCEDURE WITH PAIN MEDICATION. THE PATIENT RETURNED TO THE HOSPITAL AND WAS ADMITTED FOR PAIN MANAGEMENT. DURING HOSPITALIZATION, THE PATIENT WAS TREATED FOR PAIN AND FLUID OVERLOAD (INCLUDING PULMONARY EDEMA), AND WAS SUBSEQUENTLY DISCHARGED.
Patient problems: Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque; Hypervolemia; Inadequate Pain Relief; Necrosis; Pain; Pulmonary Edema
MAUDE report 17376047 ↗
Other Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization devices
- POD RBYPOD8-APenumbra, Inc. · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization195 reports
- CEREPAKTM MDH1Cerenovus, Inc. · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization1 recall72 reports
- Azur CX Detachable 45-750824Microvention, Inc. · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization115 reports
- Tornado G08261Cook Incorporated · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization2 recalls7 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0930CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls4 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0720CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls4 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0413CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls3 reports
- Prestige Coil System PRES0520HPKPLBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls3 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page