LOBO LOBO-9Recalls & reported problems
Okami Medical, Inc. · Peripheral Vascular Occluder · Class 2 · Implant
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 7
- Deaths reported
- 1
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 7 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00850008222061), received between Dec 30, 2025 and Sep 30, 2026 — classified as 1 death, 6 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Human-Device Interface Problem” (3 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available3
- Human-Device Interface Problem3
- No Apparent Adverse Event2
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
- Migration1
- Patient Device Interaction Problem1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions4
- Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding3
Recent adverse event reports
The 7 most recent of 7 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionSep 30, 2026Human-Device Interface Problem
Patient problems: Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding
MAUDE report 50955051 ↗MalfunctionSep 30, 2026Human-Device Interface Problem
Patient problems: Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding
MAUDE report 50955049 ↗MalfunctionSep 11, 2026No Apparent Adverse Event; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 50742870 ↗MalfunctionSep 11, 2026No Apparent Adverse Event; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 50742867 ↗MalfunctionApr 3, 2026Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available; Patient Device Interaction Problem
A REPRESENTATIVE REPORTED THAT DURING A PAVM PROCEDURE, A LARGE PULMONARY ARTERY BRANCH DID NOT ACHIEVE OCCLUSION APPROXIMATELY 20 MINUTES AFTER A LOBO-9 VASCULAR OCCLUSION SYSTEM DEVICE WAS DETACHED IN THE INTENDED VESSEL. THE VESSEL WAS REPORTED TO MEASURE APPROXIMATELY 8 MM IN DIAMETER. THE PHYSICIAN WAITED AN ADDITIONAL FIVE (5) MINUTES AND SUBSEQUENTLY DEPLOYED A SECOND LOBO-9 DEVICE PROXIMAL TO THE INITIAL DEVICE. AFTER AN ADDITIONAL 15 MINUTES, FLOW WAS OBSERVED TO DECREASE; HOWEVER, COMPLETE OCCLUSION WAS NOT ACHIEVED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24779630 ↗MalfunctionMar 25, 2026Migration
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT WITH AN ENLARGED SPLEEN AND NO EVIDENCE OF ACTIVE SPLENIC BLEEDING WAS SCHEDULED TO UNDERGO A SPLENECTOMY. THE PHYSICIAN ELECTED TO PERFORM A SPLENIC ARTERY EMBOLIZATION PRIOR TO SURGERY TO REDUCE BLEEDING RISK. THE TARGET VESSEL WAS REPORTED TO MEASURE APPROXIMATELY 6.8 MM IN DIAMETER. A LOBO-9 VASCULAR OCCLUSION SYSTEM DEVICE WAS SELECTED AND DEPLOYED FOR EMBOLIZATION. FOLLOWING DEVICE DEPLOYMENT AND DETACHMENT, IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE LOBO-9 DEVICE MIGRATED FORWARD BY APPROXIMATELY 1 CM FROM THE INTENDED PLACEMENT LOCATION.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24687166 ↗DeathDec 30, 2025Human-Device Interface Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Human-Device Interface Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
ON (B)(6) 2025, IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT PORTAL VEIN THROMBECTOMY AND THROMBOLYSIS, ALONG WITH PLUG-ASSISTED ANTEROGRADE TRANSVENOUS OBLITERATION (PATO) VIA A PERCUTANEOUS TRANSHEPATIC APPROACH, TO REDUCE THE RISK ASSOCIATED WITH RECENTLY BLEEDING HIGH-RISK GASTRIC VARICES AND TO RESTORE PATENCY OF THE MAIN PORTAL VEIN THROMBUS. SUCCESSFUL VARIX EMBOLIZATION WAS ACHIEVED USING THE LOBO VASCULAR OCCLUSION SYSTEM DEVICES AND GELFOAM BY THE CONCLUSION OF THE PROCEDURE. THE PATIENT WAS DISCHARGED TO FLOOR ROOM IN STABLE CONDITION WITHOUT ANY CONCERNS. OVERNIGHT ON (B)(6) 2025, THE PATIENT BEGAN BLEEDING AND WAS BROUGHT EMERGENTLY FOR ACTIVE HEMORRHAGE FROM THE GASTRIC VARIX (AS NOTED BY EMERGENT BEDSIDE UPPER ENDOSCOPY). THE PATIENT BECAME ANEMIC/UNSTABLE AND THUS WAS AGGRESSIVELY RESUSCITATED IN A 'MASSIVE TRANSFUSION PROTOCOL' (MTP) FASHION. EMERGENT TIPS WAS CREATED FOR PORTAL ACCESS AND PORTAL HYPERTENSION DECOMPRESSION. PORTAL VENOGRAPHY DEMONSTRATED PATENT RECENTLY EMBOLIZED VARIX VESSELS - WITH ACTIVE EXTRAVASATION FROM THE GASTRIC VARIX ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE LOBO VASCULAR OCCLUDERS. TO ADDRESS THE VARIX BLEED, ONE OF THE LOBO VASCULAR OCCLUDERS WAS REPORTED
Patient problems: Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding
MAUDE report 23931098 ↗
Other Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization devices
- POD RBYPOD8-APenumbra, Inc. · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization195 reports
- CEREPAKTM MDH1Cerenovus, Inc. · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization1 recall72 reports
- Azur CX Detachable 45-750824Microvention, Inc. · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization115 reports
- Tornado G08261Cook Incorporated · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization2 recalls7 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0930CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls4 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0720CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls4 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0413CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls3 reports
- Prestige Coil System PRES0520HPKPLBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls3 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page