Skip to content

MISHA® Knee System, Small, Right 2-1002Recalls & reported problems

Moximed, Inc. · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

1 open recall names this device. See the recall details and contact the manufacturer or your healthcare provider.

Adverse event reports
6
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
4
Recalls naming it
1

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00856047005801), received between Jul 17, 2024 and Nov 20, 2025 — classified as 4 injuries, 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Fracture” (2 reports).

1 FDA recall record name this device's identifier, 1 still open.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 1 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 1 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 1 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 3 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520263
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Recalls naming this device

  1. Dec 2, 2024Open, Classified

    Knee implant may fracture due to a supplier-related issue with one component that has nonconforming geometry at the distal end of the absorber component that may result in a reduced wall thickness and microcracks, which may lead to new or worsening symptoms of discomfort, swelling / edema, pain or stiffness, which may necessitate removal of the device.

    Z-0762-2025 · Root cause: Nonconforming Material/Component · Recall details · FDA record ↗

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem4
  • Fracture2

Patient problems

  • Post Operative Wound Infection4
  • Implant Pain1
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1

Recent adverse event reports

The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryNov 20, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT ABOUT 2.5 MONTHS AFTER MISHA IMPLANTATION, THE PATIENT RECEIVED A WASHOUT DUE TO A SUSPECTED INFECTION. A PICC LINE WAS STARTED FOR ANTIBIOTICS AFTER WHICH THE PATIENT WAS REPORTED DOING WELL.

    Patient problems: Post Operative Wound Infection

    MAUDE report 23607462 ↗
  • InjuryNov 19, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT PATIENT HAD MISHA IMPLANTATION FOR OA AND 42 DAYS LATER UNDERWENT IRRIGATION AND DEBRIDEMENT DUE TO SUSPECTED SUTURE ABSCESS WITH REMOVAL OF THE PROXIMAL-MOST SCREW. ANOTHER 10 DAYS LATER, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REPEAT IRRIGATION AND DEBRIDEMENT WITH DEVICE REMOVAL.

    Patient problems: Post Operative Wound Infection

    MAUDE report 23595603 ↗
  • InjuryNov 19, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT PATIENT UNDERWENT MISHA IMPLANTATION FOR OA ALONG WITH ARTHROSCOPY. TWO DAYS LATER, THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED REDNESS, SWELLING, AND DRAINAGE FROM THE INCISION. TEN DAYS AFTER IMPLANTATION, THE PATIENT HAD A WOUND WASHOUT AND A PICC LINE FOR INFECTION WAS STARTED. THE PATIENT'S WOUND AND KNEE PAIN IMPROVED.

    Patient problems: Post Operative Wound Infection

    MAUDE report 23595292 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 9, 2025Fracture; Fracture

    PATIENT REPORTED MEDIAL KNEE PAIN. FRACTURE AT THE TIBIAL END OF THE ABSORBER WAS OBSERVED ON X-RAY. THE DEVICE WAS REMOVED WITHOUT DIFFICULTY.

    Patient problems: Implant Pain

    MAUDE report 23011837 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 8, 2024Fracture; Fracture

    PATIENT HAD MISHA KNEE SYSTEM IMPLANTATION WITH CONCOMITANT POSTERIOR MEDIAL MENISCAL ROOT TEAR REPAIR. PATIENT EXPERIENCED ONGOING PREDOMINANTLY FEMORAL KNEE PAIN. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT CHONDROPLASTY, LYSIS OF ADHESIONS, AND DEVICE REMOVAL. DURING THE DEVICE REMOVAL, THE TIBIAL END OF THE ABSORBER WAS NOTED TO HAVE A FRACTURE. THE DEVICE WAS REMOVED WITHOUT DIFFICULTY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20641246 ↗
  • InjuryJul 17, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    PATIENT UNDERWENT MISHA IMPLANTATION FOR OA WITH CONCOMITANT MENISCAL ALLOGRAFT, ACL CYST REMOVAL AND BONE MARROW ASPIRATE INJECTION. APPROXIMATELY 4 MONTHS LATER, THE PATIENT PRESENTED WITH A SURGICAL SITE INFECTION WITH DISCHARGE FROM THE DISTAL END OF THE INCISION, REDNESS AND SWELLING. IRRIGATION AND DEBRIDEMENT OF THE WOUND WAS PERFORMED WITH REMOVAL OF THE MISHA DEVICE AND PLANNED POST-OP ORAL ANTIBIOTICS. AT THE POST-OP VISIT A WEEK LATER, THE PATIENT'S WOUND WAS WELL-HEALED.

    Patient problems: Post Operative Wound Infection

    MAUDE report 19761870 ↗

Other Medial Knee Implanted Shock Absorber devices

All Medial Knee Implanted Shock Absorber devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page