ULTIPAQ CERECYTE CFS100308-30Recalls & reported problems
Medos International Sàrl · ULTIPAQ microcoil ULTIPAQ 10 CERECYTE Coil 3mm x 8cm 190cm Contents: 1 Detachable Coil System · Class 2 · Implant
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 1
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 00878528000235), received between Oct 30, 2017 and Oct 30, 2017 — classified as 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Positioning Failure” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Positioning Failure1
Patient problems
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionOct 30, 2017Positioning Failure; Positioning Failure
IT WAS REPORTED BY A HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL THAT AN ULTIPAQ COIL (CFS10030830/C38900) WAS USED WITH AN ENPOWER DCB (LOT #F74248) DURING A SAH PROCEDURE IN THE AVM WHEN THE COIL COULD NOT BE DETACHED. THERE WAS NO MEDICAL INTERVENTION REQUIRED TO THE PATIENT AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT. THERE WAS NO DAMAGE NOTED TO THE COIL PRIOR TO THE PROCEDURE OR UPON REMOVAL FROM THE PATIENT. NO KINKS OR BENDS WERE FOUND IN THE MICROCATHETER THAT MAY HAVE CONTRIBUTED TO THE REPORTED EVENT. AN ADEQUATE CONTINUOUS FLUSH WAS MAINTAINED THROUGH THE CATHETER. REPORTEDLY, A PRE-DEPLOYMENT ELECTRICAL CHECK WAS PERFORMED. UPON PRESSING THE POWER BUTTON, ALL LIGHTS ILLUMINATED. BOTH A LOW BATTERY LIGHT AND A FAULT LIGHT WERE SEEN DURING THE CASE. THE GREEN SYSTEM READY LIGHT HAD ILLUMINATED. ALL CONNECTIONS APPEARED TO FIT PROPERLY WITHOUT THE USE OF EXCESSIVE FORCE. THE PATIENT WAS A (B)(6) FEMALE. THE DEVICE IS A BIOHAZARD AND WILL NOT BE RETURNED.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 6986439 ↗
Other DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION devices
- POD RBYPODJ60-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION355 reports
- Penumbra System SCH1Penumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION295 reports
- RUBY Coil RBY4C0860-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION276 reports
- Smart Coil 400SMTHXSFT0208Penumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION165 reports
- Penumbra System RH1-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION154 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0208CSS10Balt USA LLC · Device, Neurovascular Embolization3 recalls3 reports
- POD RBYPOD6-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION148 reports
- POD RBYPODJ30-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION132 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page